gmane.comp.lib.libtai archive

356 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

NTP servers
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:02:13 +0530
Payal <[email protected]> • #70
Re: Usage with Windows clients
Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:45:01 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #68
Re: Usage with Windows clients
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:35:08 -0600 (MDT)
"Sancho2k Lists" <[email protected]> • #66
Re: Usage with Windows clients
Mon, 09 Sep 2002 16:07:41 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #64
Usage with Windows clients
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:02:11 -0600 (MDT)
"Sancho2k Lists" <[email protected]> • #63
Re: clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:22:41 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #62
Re: clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 22:50:46 +0200
Malte Tancred <[email protected]> • #61
Re: clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:53:12 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #60
Re: clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:41:55 +0001 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #59
Re: clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:13:16 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #58
Re: clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 13:04:21 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #57
Re: clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:49:56 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #56
clockspeed and AIX 5.1 w/gcc
Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:43:08 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #55
Re: problem with sntpclock
25 Jul 2002 15:50:42 -0000
Tim Goodwin <[email protected]> • #54
Re: one second after one day
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:57:24 +0200
Matthias Teege <[email protected]> • #53
one second after one day
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:46:09 +0200
Matthias Teege <[email protected]> • #51
Re: TAI and qmail
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 03:11:17 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Pisacka <[email protected]> • #50
Re: TAI and qmail
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:22:36 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #49
Re: TAI and qmail
13 Jul 2002 20:02:39 -0000
"D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> • #48
Re: TAI and qmail
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 15:51:26 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #47
Re: TAI and qmail
Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:01:19 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Pisacka <[email protected]> • #46
Re: TAI and qmail
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:15:30 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #44
Re: TAI and qmail
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:51:37 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #43
Re: TAI and qmail
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:40:32 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #42
Re: problem with sntpclock
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:35:13 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #41
Re: TAI and qmail
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:28:52 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #40
Re: TAI and qmail
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 20:26:00 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Pisacka <[email protected]> • #39
Re: TAI and qmail
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:15:54 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #38
TAI and qmail
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:32:41 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Pisacka <[email protected]> • #37
Re: problem with sntpclock
10 Jul 2002 17:59:49 -0000
"D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> • #35
Re: problem with sntpclock
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:55:09 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #33
Re: problem with sntpclock
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:29:35 +0200
Octave <[email protected]> • #31
Re: problem with sntpclock
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 19:27:23 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #30
Re: problem with sntpclock
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:59:33 +0200
Octave <[email protected]> • #26
Re: problem with sntpclock
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:52:37 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #25
Re: problem with sntpclock
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 01:26:06 +0200
Octave <[email protected]> • #24
Re: problem with sntpclock
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:14:32 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #23
Re: problem with sntpclock
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:41:26 +0200
Octave <[email protected]> • #21
Re: problem with sntpclock
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 10:36:47 +0159
Jedi/Sector One <[email protected]> • #19
problem with sntpclock
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 09:55:50 +0200
Octave <[email protected]> • #18
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 15:30:30 -0400
Chris Johnson <[email protected]> • #17
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 14:16:25 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #16
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sun, 30 Jun 2002 18:39:33 +0200
Malte Tancred <[email protected]> • #15
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 15:22:42 -0700
Matt Pulver <[email protected]> • #14
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:33:45 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #13
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 23:16:49 +0159
Jedi/Sector One <[email protected]> • #12
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:12:36 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #11
Re: 22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:51:08 +0200
Jedi/Sector One <[email protected]> • #10
22 sec delta for clockspeed ntp
Sat, 29 Jun 2002 14:59:51 -0500
Alex Stevens <[email protected]> • #9
Re: Windows support for tai64 times?
29 Jun 2002 13:16:16 +1200
"Chris K. Young" <[email protected]> • #8
Re: Windows support for tai64 times?
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:46:48 +0100
Matthew Bloch <[email protected]> • #6
Re: Windows support for tai64 times?
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 13:20:29 +0200
Malte Tancred <[email protected]> • #5
Windows support for tai64 times?
Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:35:36 +0100
Matthew Bloch <[email protected]> • #4
Re: clockspeed and NTP
28 May 2002 14:34:38 -0000
Tim Goodwin <[email protected]> • #3
Re: clockspeed and NTP
28 May 2002 16:33:18 +0200
Frank Tegtmeyer <[email protected]> • #2
clockspeed and NTP
Tue, 28 May 2002 19:50:17 +0530
Payal <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.