gmane.comp.version-control.rcs.bugs archive

393 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: rlog -zLT sometimes displays wrong date
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 00:56:51 +0100
Oliver Billmann <[email protected]> • #2705
Re: rlog missing desc keyword error
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:58:49 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2704
Re: rlog -zLT sometimes displays wrong date
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 05:41:42 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2703
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:19:02 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2702
Re: rlog -zLT sometimes displays wrong date
Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:52:06 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2701
rlog missing desc keyword error
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:53:39 -0500
Tom Goodman <[email protected]> • #2700
rlog missing desc keyword error
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:42:20 -0500
Tom Goodman <[email protected]> • #2699
rlog -zLT sometimes displays wrong date
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:39:43 +0100
Oliver Billmann <[email protected]> • #2698
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:43:21 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2697
rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Sun, 30 Oct 2011 01:50:01 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2696
Re: ‘type COMMAND’ vs ‘which COMMAND’
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:46:50 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2695
Re: ‘type COMMAND’ vs ‘which COMMAND ’
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 13:07:33 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2694
‘type COMMAND’ vs ‘ which COMMAND’
Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:02:57 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2693
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:13:20 +0200
Honza Horak <[email protected]> • #2692
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:41:48 +0200
Honza Horak <[email protected]> • #2691
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:17:15 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2690
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:15:26 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2689
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:35:21 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2688
Re: header missing
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:27:57 -0400
"Mr. Aaron W. Swenson" <[email protected]> • #2687
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:48:58 -0400
"Mr. Aaron W. Swenson" <[email protected]> • #2686
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:15:36 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2685
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:42:06 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2684
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:57:44 GMT
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2683
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:52:05 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2682
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:26:01 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2681
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:58:55 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2680
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:52:02 -0400
"Mr. Aaron W. Swenson" <[email protected]> • #2679
Re: rcs-5.8 test failure
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:51:07 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2678
Re: header missing
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:41:31 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2677
header missing
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:39:29 +0800
IAN DELANEY <[email protected]> • #2676
rcs-5.8 test failure
Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:54:43 +0800
IAN DELANEY <[email protected]> • #2675
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:20:06 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2674
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:51:10 +0200
Honza Horak <[email protected]> • #2673
Re: congrats
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:15:33 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2672
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:03:33 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2671
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:27:47 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2670
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:47:47 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2669
Re: congrats
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:16:00 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2668
congrats
Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:12:42 -0400
"Aaron S. Hawley" <[email protected]> • #2667
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:10:37 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2666
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:35:34 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2665
[patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:39:07 +0200
Honza Horak <[email protected]> • #2664
Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 23 Jan 2011 16:20:56 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2663
rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:18:17 -0700 (MST)
"Nelson H. F. Beebe" <[email protected]> • #2662
RCS 5.7.95 (pretest for 5.8) available
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 02:20:28 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2661
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:19:42 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2660
Re: rcs.texi @dircategory
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:16:46 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2659
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:39:49 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2658
rcs.texi @dircategory
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:55:07 GMT
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2657
Re: RCS-related work in progress, please acknowledge.
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:07:11 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2656
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:45:40 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2655
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:57:32 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2654
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:42:33 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2653
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:16:45 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2652
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:19:35 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2651
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:02:07 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2650
Re: Suggested new feature for rcsdiff
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:41:40 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2649
Re: Suggested new feature for rcsdiff
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:39:34 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2648
Re: Suggested new feature for rcsdiff
Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:57:13 GMT
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2647
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:01:03 GMT
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2646
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:45:47 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2645
Re: Suggested new feature for rcsdiff
Tue, 9 Nov 2010 10:28:13 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2644
Re: Suggested new feature for rcsdiff
Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:01:31 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2643
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:02:31 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2642
Re: Suggested new feature for rcsdiff
Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:24:19 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2641
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 23:36:34 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2640
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Mon, 08 Nov 2010 22:17:38 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2639
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:09:02 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2638
Re: Suggested new feature for ci
Tue, 09 Nov 2010 05:05:08 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2637
Suggested new feature for rcsdiff
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:29:22 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2636
Suggested new feature for ci
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:36:47 -0800
Keith Thompson <[email protected]> • #2635
Re: testing facilities
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 09:51:18 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2634
testing facilities
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:41:32 GMT
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2633
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 17:25:00 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2632
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:13:43 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2631
factor-of-7 performance slowdown on a simple rlog test
Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:02:09 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2630
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:52:17 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2629
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:14:51 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2628
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:26:45 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2627
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:56:43 GMT
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2626
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:09:35 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2625
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:21:35 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2624
Re: simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:10:15 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2623
simple valgrind test found what appear to be serious memory problems
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:41:47 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2622
Re: build failure on Solaris 8 with GCC 4.4.2
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:29:38 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2621
Re: build failure on Solaris 8 with GCC 4.5.1
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:06:26 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2620
Re: GNU RCS 5.7.93 (pretest for 5.8) available
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:35:28 +0200
Ralf Wildenhues <[email protected]> • #2619
Re: build failure on Solaris 8 with GCC 4.5.1
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:51:35 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2618
Re: build failure on Solaris 8 with GCC 4.5.1
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:08:29 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2617
Re: GNU RCS 5.7.93 (pretest for 5.8) available
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:36:01 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2616
Re: Build failure on Solaris 10 with Sun cc
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:48:28 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2615
Re: build failure on Solaris 8 with GCC 4.5.1
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:16:28 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2614
Re: GNU RCS 5.7.93 (pretest for 5.8) available
Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:52:18 +0200
[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) • #2613
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.