gmane.comp.version-control.rcs.bugs archive

393 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Mon, 11 Aug 2014 07:20:55 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2805
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Sun, 10 Aug 2014 20:00:54 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2804
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Sun, 10 Aug 2014 19:43:46 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2803
Re: possible bug (rcs, version 5.9, occurs on Debian 7)
Sun, 10 Aug 2014 10:26:03 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2802
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:54:55 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2801
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Sat, 09 Aug 2014 04:26:47 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2800
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Sat, 9 Aug 2014 00:22:48 GMT
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2799
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:27:44 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2798
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Thu, 07 Aug 2014 18:42:40 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2797
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:12:44 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2796
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Wed, 06 Aug 2014 19:20:55 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2795
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:46:22 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2794
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 07:47:58 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2793
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Tue, 05 Aug 2014 08:22:18 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2792
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 23:06:13 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2791
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Mon, 04 Aug 2014 06:28:49 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2790
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Mon, 04 Aug 2014 06:22:32 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2789
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 23:58:04 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2788
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 18:05:01 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2787
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 05:18:05 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2786
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 11:42:26 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2785
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 10:19:46 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2784
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 09:27:55 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2783
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sun, 03 Aug 2014 08:44:11 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2782
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:19:19 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2781
Re: possible bug (rcs, version 5.9, occurs on Debian 7)
Sat, 2 Aug 2014 11:24:37 +0200
Bostjan Vilfan <[email protected]> • #2780
Re: RCS-5.8.2 Re: rcs-5.7.96 build feedback
Sat, 02 Aug 2014 07:52:09 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2779
Re: possible bug (rcs, version 5.9, occurs on Debian 7)
Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:25:43 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2778
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:18:04 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2777
Re: possible bug (rcs, version 5.9, occurs on Debian 7)
Sun, 27 Jul 2014 22:09:14 +0200
Bostjan Vilfan <[email protected]> • #2776
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Sun, 27 Jul 2014 17:49:43 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2775
Re: possible bug (rcs, version 5.9, occurs on Debian 7)
Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:36:06 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2774
Re: bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:49:26 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2773
bug #41707: RCS 5.8 file corruption when using file descriptor IO for large files
Thu, 19 Jun 2014 23:30:34 +0200
Achim Gratz <[email protected]> • #2772
Fwd: possible bug (rcs, version 5.9, occurs on Debian 7)
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:51:11 +0100
Bostjan Vilfan <[email protected]> • #2771
possible bug (rcs, version 5.9, occurs on Debian 7)
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 08:47:58 +0100
Bostjan Vilfan <[email protected]> • #2770
Re: In rcs 5.9.1 build-aux/extract-help is bash-specific
Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:05:48 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2769
Re: In rcs 5.9.1 build-aux/extract-help is bash-specific
Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:00:20 +0200
Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> • #2768
Re: In rcs 5.9.1 build-aux/extract-help is bash-specific
Sun, 20 Oct 2013 17:04:55 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2767
Re: In rcs 5.9.1 build-aux/extract-help is bash-specific
Sun, 20 Oct 2013 15:20:54 +0200
Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> • #2766
Re: In rcs 5.9.1 build-aux/extract-help is bash-specific
Sun, 20 Oct 2013 13:51:57 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2765
In rcs 5.9.1 build-aux/extract-help is bash-specific
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:55:00 +0200
Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> • #2764
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:44:38 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2763
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 14:29:16 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2762
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:27:07 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2761
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:13:40 +0200
Jörn Clausen <[email protected]> • #2760
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:43:37 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2759
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:01:10 +0200
Jörn Clausen <[email protected]> • #2758
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:05:33 +0200
Jörn Clausen <[email protected]> • #2757
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:20:21 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2756
Re: RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Fri, 31 May 2013 22:55:20 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2755
RCS 5.9.0 does not compile on Solaris
Wed, 29 May 2013 13:12:48 +0200
Jörn Clausen <[email protected]> • #2754
fyi, repo branch ‘p’ rewound
Thu, 02 May 2013 18:11:02 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2753
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:22:29 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2752
Re: [patch] Help/man pages sync
Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:33:30 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2751
Re: [patch] two rcs-5.8 patches
Sat, 06 Apr 2013 12:04:58 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2750
[patch] Help/man pages sync
Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:07:57 +0200
Honza Horak <[email protected]> • #2749
Re: Wrong revision is retrieved
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:46:57 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2748
Re: rcs and Automake-related vulnerabilities
Fri, 08 Mar 2013 09:47:36 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2747
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:08:13 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2746
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:57:05 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2745
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:03:22 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2744
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:46:11 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2743
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:09:31 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2742
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 9 Jul 2012 21:32:36 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2741
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Sat, 07 Jul 2012 09:24:24 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2740
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Fri, 6 Jul 2012 20:06:20 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2739
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:14:16 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2738
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:10:13 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2737
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:22:56 -0700
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2736
Re: rcs-5.8-1 on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:19:12 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2735
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:44:17 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2734
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 03:05:43 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2733
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:19:25 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2732
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:48:33 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2731
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:53:54 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2730
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:58:44 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2729
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:21:34 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2728
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:18:45 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2727
Re: shell for "make check"
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:59:49 +0200
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2726
shell for "make check"
30 Mar 2012 10:32:01 -0000
<[email protected]> • #2725
Re: rcs-5.8 test failures on HP-UX 11.31
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:31:08 +0000
Paul Ackersviller <[email protected]> • #2724
Re: RCS should use "diff --label", not "diff -L", with GNU diff
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:32:42 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2723
Re: RCS should use "diff --label", not "diff -L", with GNU diff
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:20:38 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2722
Re: RCS should use "diff --label", not "diff -L", with GNU diff
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:25:56 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2721
Re: RCS should use "diff --label", not "diff -L", with GNU diff
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:24:27 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2720
RE: 2 of 36 test failed RCS5.8 - final update
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:58:04 -0800
"Mike Dooley (midooley)" <[email protected]> • #2719
RCS should use "diff --label", not "diff -L", with GNU diff
Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:06:00 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2718
Re: 2 of 36 test failed RCS5.8 - final update
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 21:02:03 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2717
Re: 2 of 36 test failed RCS5.8 - final update
Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:10:20 -0800
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2716
Re: 2 of 36 test failed RCS5.8 - final update
Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:13:09 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2715
RE: 2 of 36 test failed RCS5.8 - update
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:15:02 -0800
"Mike Dooley (midooley)" <[email protected]> • #2714
2 of 36 test failed
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 07:41:23 -0800
"Mike Dooley (midooley)" <[email protected]> • #2713
RE: 2 of 36 test failed RCS5.8 - final update
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 08:22:39 -0800
"Mike Dooley (midooley)" <[email protected]> • #2712
Re: cvs is not gnu
Sun, 01 Jan 2012 11:49:39 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2711
cvs is not gnu
Sat, 31 Dec 2011 17:10:15 -0800
[email protected] (Karl Berry) • #2710
Re: rlog missing desc keyword error
Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:39:26 +0100
Thien-Thi Nguyen <[email protected]> • #2709
Re: rlog missing desc keyword error
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:30:33 -0500
Tom Goodman <[email protected]> • #2708
Re: rlog missing desc keyword error
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:35:45 -0500
Tom Goodman <[email protected]> • #2707
Re: rlog missing desc keyword error
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:38:00 -0800
Paul Eggert <[email protected]> • #2706
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.