gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel archive

369 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Regarding: faq.xml.qna issues
Sun, 8 May 2005 06:54:54 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3476
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sun, 8 May 2005 06:24:29 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3475
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sun, 8 May 2005 06:22:20 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3474
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Sun, 8 May 2005 06:01:49 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3473
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Sat, 7 May 2005 16:08:00 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3472
Regarding: faq.xml.qna issues
Sat, 7 May 2005 15:36:09 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3471
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sat, 7 May 2005 13:59:01 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3470
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Sat, 7 May 2005 13:53:01 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3469
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sat, 7 May 2005 08:32:26 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3468
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sat, 7 May 2005 08:27:47 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3467
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Sat, 7 May 2005 04:02:12 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3466
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Fri, 06 May 2005 21:07:53 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3465
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sat, 7 May 2005 01:25:08 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3464
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sat, 7 May 2005 00:51:58 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3463
Re: faq.xml.qna
Sat, 7 May 2005 00:04:07 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3462
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Fri, 6 May 2005 23:54:47 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3461
Re: faq.xml.qna
Fri, 6 May 2005 23:54:07 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3460
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Fri, 6 May 2005 22:42:49 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3459
Re: faq.xml.qna
Fri, 6 May 2005 22:24:47 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3458
Re: Test suite
Fri, 6 May 2005 22:28:06 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3457
Re: Release 0.7.15 ported on Mac
Fri, 6 May 2005 21:59:42 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3456
Re: faq.xml.qna
Fri, 6 May 2005 21:55:21 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3455
Re: Release 0.7.15 ported on Mac
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:52:22 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3454
Re: Release 0.7.15 ported on Mac
Fri, 6 May 2005 21:45:56 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3453
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Fri, 6 May 2005 21:41:07 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3452
Re: faq.xml.qna
Fri, 06 May 2005 15:40:55 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3451
Re: faq.xml.qna
Fri, 6 May 2005 21:34:21 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3450
Re: Test suite
Fri, 06 May 2005 14:07:55 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3449
Re: gnome bug 135093
Fri, 06 May 2005 14:00:09 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3448
Re: gnome bug 135093
Fri, 6 May 2005 17:46:12 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3447
Re: gnome bug 135093
Fri, 6 May 2005 10:13:38 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3446
Re: Test suite
Fri, 6 May 2005 10:03:24 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3445
Re: Release 0.7.15 ported on Mac
Thu, 05 May 2005 19:54:06 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3444
Re: Hacking on the new widget
Thu, 05 May 2005 19:52:14 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3443
Any other Conglomerate people going to GUADEC?
Thu, 05 May 2005 19:45:57 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3442
Re: Validation of new document based on cnxml
Thu, 05 May 2005 19:40:42 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3441
Re: "easy-fix" bugzilla keyword becomes "gnome-love"
Thu, 05 May 2005 19:38:28 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3440
Test suite
Thu, 05 May 2005 13:58:54 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3439
Test suite
Thu, 05 May 2005 13:58:25 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3438
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:02:09 -0400
Dave Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3437
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:12:02 +0200
Steinar Bang <[email protected]> • #3436
Re: faq.xml.qna
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:04:04 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3435
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:15:01 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3434
Re: faq.xml.qna
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:13:33 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3433
Re: faq.xml.qna
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:57:49 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3432
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:56:34 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3431
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:55:26 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3430
Re: faq.xml.qna
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:03:27 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3429
faq.xml.qna
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:42:39 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3428
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:53:23 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3427
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:45:42 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3426
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:28:01 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3425
Re: update proposal on conglomerate spec file
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:40:46 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3424
update proposal on conglomerate spec file
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:30:50 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3423
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 09:32:21 +0200
Steinar Bang <[email protected]> • #3422
test
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:12:29 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3421
Re: Fwd: Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 20:30:06 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3420
Re: Fwd: Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:47:46 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3419
Re: Fwd: Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:34:11 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3418
Comparative review of XML editors
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:15:10 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3417
Re: Fwd: Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:39:24 +0100
Jeff Martin <[email protected]> • #3416
Fwd: Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:48:00 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3415
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 22:37:17 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3414
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:54:11 +0200
Steinar Bang <[email protected]> • #3413
Re: gnome bug 135093 and backend
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:53:34 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3412
Re: gnome bug 135093
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:23:00 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3411
Re: gnome bug 135093
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:15:59 -0400
Thierry Moisan <[email protected]> • #3410
Re: gnome bug 135093
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:28:24 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3409
Re: gnome bug 135093
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:26:41 -0400
Thierry Moisan <[email protected]> • #3408
Re: Comparative review of XML editors
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 07:34:47 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3407
Comparative review of XML editors
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:41:04 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3406
Re: gnome bug 135093
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:06:06 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3405
gnome bug 135093
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:10:07 -0400
Thierry Moisan <[email protected]> • #3404
Re: New Dia-based documentation
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:16:56 +0200
Steinar Bang <[email protected]> • #3403
Re: New Dia-based documentation
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:05:55 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3402
Re: New Dia-based documentation
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:52:23 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3401
Re: New Dia-based documentation
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:45:43 +0200
Steinar Bang <[email protected]> • #3400
New Dia-based documentation
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:41:00 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3399
make distcheck failed
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 13:30:39 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3398
Entity tools
Sat, 09 Apr 2005 01:30:17 -0400
Dave Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3397
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:54:04 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3396
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:56:21 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3395
Re: New debug plugin
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:44:24 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3394
Re: New debug plugin
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:53:20 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3393
Re: New debug plugin
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:42:18 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3392
Re: Kind of a patch for sgml importer
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:41:21 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3391
Re: Question about faq.xml
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 18:35:04 +0200
[email protected] (Geert Stappers) • #3390
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:29:05 +0100
Jeff Martin <[email protected]> • #3389
Re: Kind of a patch for sgml importer
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:11:43 -0400
David Malcolm <[email protected]> • #3388
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:00:21 +0100
Jeff Martin <[email protected]> • #3387
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:19:30 +0100
Jeff Martin <[email protected]> • #3386
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:04:58 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3385
Kind of a patch for sgml importer
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:57:18 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3384
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:52:33 +0100
Jeff Martin <[email protected]> • #3383
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:31:07 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3382
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 08 Apr 2005 15:26:17 +0100
Jeff Martin <[email protected]> • #3381
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:17:20 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3380
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:58:17 +0200
Sean Wheller <[email protected]> • #3379
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:53:21 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3378
Re: Patch for doctype and faq
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:49:14 +0200
Michèle Garoche <[email protected]> • #3377
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.