gmane.ietf.asrg.smtpverify archive

375 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

LMAP Bof to be multicasted
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:04:55 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #175
Re: [taugh.com-johnl] Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:12:46 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #174
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:28:46 -0800 (PST)
William Leibzon <[email protected]> • #173
Re: SPF and the need for SRS
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:02:57 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #172
Re: [taugh.com-johnl] Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a
28 Feb 2004 18:58:17 -0500
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #171
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:26:50 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #170
Re: [taugh.com-johnl] How accountability helps
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:13:11 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #169
Re: [taugh.com-johnl] How accountability helps
28 Feb 2004 17:07:36 -0500
"John R Levine" <[email protected]> • #168
How accountability helps
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:50:15 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #167
how the board might look a few moves ahead.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:46:45 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #166
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
28 Feb 2004 21:39:31 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #165
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:33:38 +0100
"Peter J. Holzer" <[email protected]> • #164
What does "legitimate" mean?
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:27:27 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #163
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:36:07 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:26:24 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #161
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 20:46:49 +0100
"Peter J. Holzer" <[email protected]> • #160
proposed 2-d faq
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:48:29 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #159
On the need to spell out the obvious
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:43:10 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #158
heuristics vs conformance.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:41:00 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #157
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
28 Feb 2004 19:32:39 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #156
Cost/benefit comparisons --- invitation for review.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:31:42 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #155
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
28 Feb 2004 19:31:25 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #154
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:22:29 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #153
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 14:18:50 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #152
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
28 Feb 2004 18:18:31 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #151
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
28 Feb 2004 18:13:46 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #150
SPF and the need for SRS
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:10:29 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #149
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:29:10 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #148
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:37:27 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #147
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:29:16 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #146
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
28 Feb 2004 15:01:45 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #145
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:14:51 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #144
Re: Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
28 Feb 2004 02:24:37 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #143
Problems with SPF, solutions, and a timeline.
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:16:22 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #142
Re: Some thoughts on SMTP Verification
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:04:54 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #141
Some thoughts on SMTP Verification
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:39:59 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #140
Updated agenda for MARID
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:13:04 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #139
Re: SPF and egos
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:10:09 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #138
Re: Reputation
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:13:24 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #137
Re: MSFT's Caller ID proposal yawned at
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:13:57 -0600
"Gordon Fecyk" <[email protected]> • #136
Re: MSFT's Caller ID proposal posted
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 07:44:29 +1000
"Ian Peter" <[email protected]> • #135
MSFT's Caller ID proposal posted
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:28:37 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #134
Re: SPF and egos
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:56:49 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #133
Re: SPF and egos
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 20:53:30 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #132
Re: SPF and egos
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:17:51 +1000
"Ian Peter" <[email protected]> • #131
Re: Spam with "non-forged" sender
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:13:08 -0500
Philip Miller <[email protected]> • #130
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:57:24 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #129
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:40:48 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #128
Spam with "non-forged" sender
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:25:03 +0100
"Peter J. Holzer" <[email protected]> • #127
Re: SPF and egos
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:49:50 +0500
"Viktor S. Grishchenko" <[email protected]> • #126
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:23:23 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #125
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:11:07 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #124
Re: SPF and egos
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:59:53 -0800
Jeff Silverman <[email protected]> • #123
Re: SPF and Inertia
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:35:31 -0600
"Gordon Fecyk" <[email protected]> • #122
Re: SPF and egos
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:31:35 +1000
"Ian Peter" <[email protected]> • #121
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:04:41 -0500
George Schlossnagle <[email protected]> • #120
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:49:33 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #119
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:47:15 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #118
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 04:46:11 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #117
Re: SPF and egos
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 18:19:09 -0600
"Gordon Fecyk" <[email protected]> • #116
SPF
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:07:20 +1000
"Ian Peter" <[email protected]> • #115
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:28:16 +1000
"Ian Peter" <[email protected]> • #114
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:17:37 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #113
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:01:53 +0100
"Peter J. Holzer" <[email protected]> • #112
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:47:13 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #111
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:41:48 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #110
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:27:42 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #109
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:10:37 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #108
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:19:32 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #107
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 21:06:34 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #106
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:49:05 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #105
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:33:56 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #104
Re: static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:01:53 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #103
static versus dynamic nature of DNS: rate limiting
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:19:31 -0500
Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> • #102
Re: Virus authors produce open spam relays (long digression on
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:33:14 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #101
Protection against Viruses (Was: Virus authors produce ...)
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:30:52 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #100
Re: Virus authors produce open spam relays (long digression on
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 20:41:42 -0800
Jeff Silverman <[email protected]> • #99
Re: Virus authors produce open spam relays
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:59:13 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Virus authors produce open spam relays
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:24:32 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #97
Virus authors produce open spam relays
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:53:45 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #96
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:25:08 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #95
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:19:26 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #94
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:41:12 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #93
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:31:15 -0800
Jeff Silverman <[email protected]> • #92
Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:04:36 -0800
Jeff Silverman <[email protected]> • #91
Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:38:19 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #90
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:35:26 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #89
Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:17:10 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #88
Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:04:06 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #87
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:01:36 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #86
Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:36:28 -0500
Yakov Shafranovich <[email protected]> • #85
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:37:44 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #84
Re: Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:20:05 -0600
"Gordon Fecyk" <[email protected]> • #83
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:32:28 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #82
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:48:59 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #81
Re: 9 reasons for dynamic authorization records
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:58:31 -0500
"Alan DeKok" <[email protected]> • #80
Windows code leaks, ASN.1, etc
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:35:13 +0500
"Viktor S. Grishchenko" <[email protected]> • #79
Re: 15 reasons for using URLs/HTTP
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:23:44 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #78
Re: 15 reasons for using URLs/HTTP
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:40:52 -0800
Mark Baugher <[email protected]> • #77
Re: 15 reasons for using URLs/HTTP
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:23:40 +0100
Hadmut Danisch <[email protected]> • #76
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.