gmane.ietf.simple archive
382 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:26:45 -0500Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:26:05 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:31:22 -0600Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:14:26 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:26:01 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:08:28 +0200Re: updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:14:30 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:12:10 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:01:15 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:32:23 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:23:17 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:15:38 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:12:57 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:01:57 -0400Re: updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:55:00 -0600Re: updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:49:40 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:34:53 -0500Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:44:56 -0400updated SIP-XMPP gatewaying specs
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:09:58 -0600Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:49:33 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:46:14 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 08:27:54 -0600Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:39:36 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 23:42:02 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:16:46 -0400Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:02:58 -0400Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:11:31 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 14:37:57 +0300Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:33:47 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:29:46 +0300Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:12:40 -0600Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:47:51 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:29:16 +0300Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 17:55:53 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 15:23:34 +0200Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:31:18 +0200Re: How to identify the session
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 09:36:02 +0200Re: How to identify the session
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:07:26 -0400Re: Simple Digest, Vol 102, Issue 4
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:34:04 +0530How to identify the session
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:37:09 +0530Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:48:27 -0400Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:54:14 +0200Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:22:13 -0400Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 22:53:53 +0200Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:24:05 -0400Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 08:48:24 +0200Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:46:08 +0530Re: nickname length
Mon, 8 Oct 2012 13:55:57 -0500Fwd: Re: [precis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-03.txt
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 12:45:12 -0600Re: nickname length
Mon, 8 Oct 2012 20:19:35 +0200Re: nickname length
Mon, 8 Oct 2012 19:56:40 +0200Re: nickname length
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:54:53 -0600Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Mon, 08 Oct 2012 10:44:50 -0400Re: How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Mon, 8 Oct 2012 09:17:29 +0200How to identify application type of MSRP session.
Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:41:58 +0530Re: nickname length
Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:32:44 +0200Re: Fwd: Re: [precis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-02.txt
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:33:11 -0600Re: Fwd: Re: [precis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-02.txt
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:25:12 -0500Fwd: Re: [precis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-02.txt
Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:48:35 -0600Re: nickname length
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:18:27 -0600nickname length
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 14:30:24 -0600Re: Encapsulating MSRP
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:43:18 -0500Encapsulating MSRP
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:01:20 +0200Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:29:05 +0200Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:28:15 +0200Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:07:17 -0400Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:04:29 -0400Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:13:05 +0200Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:05:31 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:02:11 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:01:56 +0200Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:59:15 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:50:14 +0200Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:38:33 +0200Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:31:57 +0200Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:30:43 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:20:37 -0400Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:33:05 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:24:25 -0400Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:10:42 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:10:35 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:51:13 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:46:47 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:34:55 -0400Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:17:11 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:06:24 -0500Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:32:51 -0400Re: Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:23:58 -0500Chat: questions on 'accept-wrapped-types'
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:46:23 +0200Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:49:43 -0400Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:22:10 -0500Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:00:51 -0400Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:20:37 +0200Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:41:56 +0200Fwd: Help the NomCom: Nominations and Feedback
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 16:40:26 -0500Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:12:09 -0500Re: accept-types [was Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 14:28:45 +0200Re: Timer for chunked messaging. Was [Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:45:24 +0200Re: Timer for chunked messaging. Was [Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)]
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:27:52 +0200Re: Fwd: Re: Adrian Farrel's Discuss on draft-ietf-simple-chat-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thu, 6 Sep 2012 12:22:47 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.