gmane.ietf.simple archive
382 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →
SIMPLE Interop Threads
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:47:24 -0500Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:46:00 -0500Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:22:31 +0100Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:14:39 +0100Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:13:05 +0100Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:05:45 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:39:58 +0100Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:08:48 +0200Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 14:52:45 -0500Re: SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 20:20:59 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:53:25 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:45:52 -0700Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:40:11 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:34:28 -0700Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 19:27:16 +0100Re: Fwd: [precis] spaces at end of nickname
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:57:50 -0600Re: Fwd: [precis] spaces at end of nickname
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:22:13 -0400Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:11:01 -0400Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:44:28 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:38:13 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:15:41 +0100Re: Fwd: [precis] spaces at end of nickname
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:10:19 +0100Re: Fwd: [precis] spaces at end of nickname
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:07:26 -0500Re: Fwd: [precis] spaces at end of nickname
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:06:22 +0100Fwd: [precis] spaces at end of nickname
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:02:13 -0600Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:56:19 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:41:31 -0400Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:58:17 +0100Re: SIMPLE and Emergency Services
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:08:29 -0700Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:08:27 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:32:59 -0500Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:36:56 +0000Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:21:54 +0000Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:29:46 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:36:50 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:01:38 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:54:35 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:49:45 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:19:13 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:06:18 +0100Re: Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:40:16 +0100Trying to summarize discussion on SIMPLE interop
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 19:00:41 +0200Re: XMPP servedr based presence (new subject)
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:47:22 +0200Fwd: [precis] I-D Action: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-04.txt
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:16:13 -0600Re: - MSRP peer library O.S. now available announcement
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:28:43 +0200- MSRP peer library O.S. now available announcement
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:23:28 +0100Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:32:50 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:03:33 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:42:49 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:14:37 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:13:25 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:01:26 -0600Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:56:03 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:42:18 -0600Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:36:40 -0400Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:23:25 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:01:31 +0200Re: SIP SIMPLE end-point addressbook application
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:51:52 -0400Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:46:56 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:43:57 -0400Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:29:08 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:53 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:25:55 -0600Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:46:41 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:40:52 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:04:29 +0000Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:14:28 -0500Re: New draft on "SIMPLE made Simple"
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:11:03 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:08:53 -0500Re: New draft on "SIMPLE made Simple"
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:06:04 -0500Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:39:04 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:33:40 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:29:10 +0200Re: New draft on "SIMPLE made Simple"
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:24:24 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:24:51 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:51:12 +0200Re: Should SIMPLE be rechartered, replaced, closed, or what?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:15:20 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:53:02 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:51:22 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:29:25 -0400Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:13:24 -0400Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:41:13 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:31:03 +0200Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:22:34 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:02:51 -0400Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 23:04:59 +0200Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:48:00 -0400Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:42:45 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:29:47 -0400Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 19:59:09 +0000Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:29:48 +0200Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:15:16 -0400Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:07:52 +0200Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:01:25 +0200Re: Focusing on SIMPLE-SIMPLE interoperability
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:47:06 +0200SIP SIMPLE end-point addressbook application
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 21:12:49 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:56:12 -0500Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 20:22:36 +0200Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:48:21 -0500Re: Controversial: Have SIMPLE reached is goal? Or is it an IETF failure?
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:42:22 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.