gmane.ietf.sip archive

2919 archived articles, newest first (page 16 of 30). Latest articles →

Re: scope of derive
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:12:22 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21737
Re: scope of derive
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:25:22 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21736
Query on History-Info.
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:01:19 +0530
Siddharth <[email protected]> • #21735
Re: scope of derive
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:32:18 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21734
Draft minutes from IETF 73
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:28:05 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21733
Re: scope of derive
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:04:08 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21732
Re: scope of derive
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:32:44 -0700
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> • #21731
Re: scope of derive
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:20:13 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21730
Re: Query related to Expires header with value 0 in INVITE
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:11:14 +0800
"孙永光" <[email protected]> • #21729
Re: scope of derive
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:08:41 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21728
Re: scope of derive
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:48:42 -0700
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> • #21727
Re: scope of derive
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:47:58 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21726
Re: scope of derive
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:46:14 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21725
Re: what should be DERIVEd from the IETF?
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:02:39 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21724
Re: scope of derive
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:34:43 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21723
Re: scope of derive
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:54:50 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21722
Headsup on new boilerplate on existing approved drafts
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:54:23 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21721
Re: ACK not matching
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:44:34 -0500
"Dale Worley" <[email protected]> • #21720
Re: Query related to Expires header with value 0 in INVITE
Wed, 3 Dec 2008 10:16:03 -0800
Neelakantan Balasubramanian <[email protected]> • #21719
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:45:48 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21718
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 08:35:46 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #21717
Re: ACK not matching
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:27:47 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21716
ACK not matching
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:39:56 +0530
<[email protected]> • #21715
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:49:01 -0800
Anders Kristensen <[email protected]> • #21714
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:30:20 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21713
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:01:44 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21712
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:42:17 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21711
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:20:18 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21710
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:10:49 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21709
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:35:45 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21708
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:01:31 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21707
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:56:45 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #21706
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:38:04 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21705
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:25:13 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21704
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:54:51 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21703
SIP interim meetings
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:12:22 +0100
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email protected]> • #21702
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:08:52 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #21701
Re: INFO event package: C-D value always "render"?
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:56:04 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #21700
Re: multiple bodies in any SIP message
Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:50:37 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #21699
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:27:24 -0000
"Pete Cordell" <[email protected]> • #21698
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:15:26 -0000
"Pete Cordell" <[email protected]> • #21697
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:42:39 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21696
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:06:52 -0000
"Pete Cordell" <[email protected]> • #21695
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:44:16 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21694
Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-03: comments and questions
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:13:43 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21693
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 23:27:34 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21692
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 22:44:30 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21691
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:27:29 -0800
"Doken, Serhad" <[email protected]> • #21690
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:23:25 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21689
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:45:39 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21688
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 00:25:02 +0100
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email protected]> • #21687
what should be DERIVEd from the IETF?
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:56:54 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21686
Re: Thoughts on e2e identity verification
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:35:42 -0700
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> • #21685
Re: Another possible limitation of DERIVE
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:34:51 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21684
Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-03: comments and questions
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:17:25 -0600
Robert Sparks <[email protected]> • #21683
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:07:37 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21682
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:03:53 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21681
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 15:00:48 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21680
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:39:25 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21679
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:35:30 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21678
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:25:55 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21677
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:00:48 -0800
Henry Sinnreich <[email protected]> • #21676
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:39:33 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21675
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:37:15 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21674
Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-03: comments and questions
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 20:33:21 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21673
Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-03: comments and questions
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 14:22:13 -0500
"Brett Tate" <[email protected]> • #21672
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:22:04 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21671
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:42:33 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21670
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:37:19 -0500
"Dale Worley" <[email protected]> • #21669
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:27:18 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21668
Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-03: comments and questions
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:26:18 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21667
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:07:59 +0000
"Scott Lawrence" <[email protected]> • #21666
Re: INFO event package: C-D value always "render"?
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 19:05:59 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21665
Re: multiple bodies in any SIP message
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:59:39 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21664
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:43:53 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21663
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:32:28 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21662
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:22:42 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21661
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 09:15:38 -0800
Henry Sinnreich <[email protected]> • #21660
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:15:05 -0600
Dean Willis <[email protected]> • #21659
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:10:41 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21658
Re: draft-ietf-sip-199-03: comments and questions
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 12:06:14 -0500
"Brett Tate" <[email protected]> • #21657
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:55:11 +0000
"Scott Lawrence" <[email protected]> • #21656
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:37:08 -0800
Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> • #21655
Re: multiple bodies in any SIP message
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:33:47 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #21654
Re: Identity Survey
Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:31:15 +0100
"Victor Pascual Ávila" <[email protected]> • #21653
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:49:09 +0100
Jiri Kuthan <[email protected]> • #21652
Re: INFO event package: C-D value always "render"?
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:28:00 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #21651
Re: scope of derive
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:08:27 +0000
"Elwell, John" <[email protected]> • #21650
RFC 5360: doubt related to an Event header of PUBLISH
Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:42:02 +0900
OKUMURA Shinji <[email protected]> • #21649
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 23:06:58 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21648
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 22:44:35 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21647
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:18:02 -0500
"Dale Worley" <[email protected]> • #21646
Re: FW: I-D Action:draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-00.txt
Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:12:34 -0500
"Dale Worley" <[email protected]> • #21645
Re: INFO event package: C-D value always "render"?
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:46:25 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21644
Re: multiple bodies in any SIP message
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:45:12 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21643
INFO event package: C-D value always "render"?
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:50:18 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21642
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:34:42 -0500
"Mary Barnes" <[email protected]> • #21641
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:36:39 +0100
"Christer Holmberg" <[email protected]> • #21640
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:49:14 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21639
Re: INFO Framework - one pakage per INFO
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:45:27 -0500
Hadriel Kaplan <[email protected]> • #21638
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.