gmane.mail.qmail.scanner archive

789 archived articles, newest first (page 8 of 8). Latest articles →

qmail-smtpd + validrcptto.cdb
Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:25:02 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5174
Re: razor2 and qmail-scanner - message listed but only tagged
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 17:16:20 +0300
Liutauras Adomaitis <[email protected]> • #5173
Re: razor2 and qmail-scanner - message listed but only tagged
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:36:05 -0400
Jim Maul <[email protected]> • #5172
razor2 and qmail-scanner - message listed but only tagged
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:28:44 +0300
Liutauras Adomaitis <[email protected]> • #5171
Re: Would anybody help me with this??
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:31:10 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5170
Would anybody help me with this??
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:23:35 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5169
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Wed, 6 Sep 2006 02:14:04 +0200
Maciej Soltysiak <[email protected]> • #5168
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:30:37 +0200
"Arthur Odekerken" <[email protected]> • #5167
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:04:38 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5166
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 22:31:21 +0200
"Arthur Odekerken" <[email protected]> • #5165
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 18:32:44 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5164
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 13:48:57 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5163
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 12:13:28 +0200
Maciej Soltysiak <[email protected]> • #5162
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Mon, 04 Sep 2006 08:07:14 +0700
Thomas Wahyudi <[email protected]> • #5161
Re: spam not getting tagged properly
Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:25:55 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5160
spam not getting tagged properly
Sat, 2 Sep 2006 22:01:20 +0200
"Arthur Odekerken" <[email protected]> • #5159
Re: Blocking e.g. EXE
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:50:29 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5158
Re: Blocking e.g. EXE
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:43:31 +0200
"Alex Ascherl - Qmailrocks" <[email protected]> • #5157
Re: Blocking e.g. EXE
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:40:01 +0200
"Alex Ascherl - Qmailrocks" <[email protected]> • #5156
Re: Blocking e.g. EXE
Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:10:39 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5155
Blocking e.g. EXE
Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:11:28 +0200
"Alex Ascherl - Qmailrocks" <[email protected]> • #5154
Re: help with an idea on how to add "rblsmtp" like blocking at the qmail scanner level.
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:25:46 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5152
Patch for Kaspersky aveclient
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 02:40:47 +0200
Alexander Hosfeld <[email protected]> • #5151
help with an idea on how to add "rblsmtp" like blocking at the qmail scanner level.
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:24:39 -0500
"Rance Hall" <[email protected]> • #5150
Re: email size
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:30:42 -0600
MT <[email protected]> • #5149
Re: email size
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:49:33 -0700
"Anthony Baratta" <[email protected]> • #5148
email size
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:42:20 -0600
MT <[email protected]> • #5147
Re: Odd X-Spam-Status
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 11:02:30 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5146
Odd X-Spam-Status
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:08:42 -0600 (MDT)
John Evans <[email protected]> • #5145
Spam Assassin detection changed in QS 2.xx?
Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:12:07 +0200
"Peter A." <[email protected]> • #5144
Script under contrib
Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:40:21 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5143
strange Received: header
Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:28:36 +0200
"joeri Belis" <[email protected]> • #5142
Re: View quarantine spam messages thru webmail
Mon, 07 Aug 2006 09:45:08 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5141
Re: View quarantine spam messages thru webmail
Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:44:22 +0100
Eric Carlson <[email protected]> • #5140
Qmailscan gives up, temporary files not cleaned
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:49:12 +0200
"Alex X." <[email protected]> • #5139
Re: View quarantine spam messages thru webmail
Wed, 02 Aug 2006 07:48:41 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5138
Re: View quarantine spam messages thru webmail
Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:13:41 +0100
Eric Carlson <[email protected]> • #5137
Re: View quarantine spam messages thru webmail
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 13:24:36 +0100
Miloska <[email protected]> • #5136
View quarantine spam messages thru webmail
Tue, 1 Aug 2006 08:36:36 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5135
Getting /var/spool/qmailscan/quarantine/new to [email protected]
Tue, 01 Aug 2006 11:51:35 +0100
Eric Carlson <[email protected]> • #5134
Re: Deleting spam
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:24:03 -0500
Bob Jones <[email protected]> • #5133
Deleting spam
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:17:30 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5132
Re: patch qms for 2.01
Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:49:34 +0100
"La Pasion Del Rio" <[email protected]> • #5131
Possible bug in sub email_recips
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:15:24 +0200
"Steven Lam, KeenServer" <[email protected]> • #5130
Re: patch qms for 2.01
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:34:43 -0400
Jim Maul <[email protected]> • #5129
patch qms for 2.01
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:19:01 +0100
"La Pasion Del Rio" <[email protected]> • #5128
Feature: Queue for Qmail-Scanner???
Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:12:20 +1000
"Tvt Ftp" <[email protected]> • #5127
Re: forwarding mails marked as spam to another local account
Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:04:04 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5126
forwarding mails marked as spam to another local account
Thu, 20 Jul 2006 08:54:16 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5125
forwarding mails marked as spam to another local account...
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:19:51 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5124
Re: Adding new domains - Question!?
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:59:23 +0200
Ruben Cardenal <[email protected]> • #5123
Adding new domains - Question!?
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:07:36 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5122
QS-2.01 need patched version?
Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:41:13 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5121
Qmail-scanner and new Sophos scanner
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:35:32 +0100
"Andrew Hodgson" <[email protected]> • #5120
Re: qmail-scanner error
Tue, 18 Jul 2006 06:50:42 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5119
qmail-scanner error
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:23:29 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5118
Qmail-scanner strange error please help.
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 13:50:26 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5117
Re: An error when installing - please help
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:44:21 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5116
An error when installing - please help
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:34:41 -0300
"Facundo Barrera" <[email protected]> • #5115
log file not found
Tue, 11 Jul 2006 15:23:48 +0530
"Suranga Kasthuriarachchi" <[email protected]> • #5114
Re: No spamassassin for authenticated users ?
Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:56:14 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5113
No spamassassin for authenticated users ?
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:32:39 +0200
[email protected] • #5112
qmail-inject died / insecure dependency error
Wed, 05 Jul 2006 12:44:26 -0400
Dave Della Costa <[email protected]> • #5111
Re: Filtering message body
3 Jul 2006 22:00:04 -0000
[email protected] • #5110
Re: Need to get Message-ID back after changed to X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID
Mon, 03 Jul 2006 22:39:53 +0100
Eric Carlson <[email protected]> • #5109
Re: Need to get Message-ID back after changed to X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID
Tue, 04 Jul 2006 07:54:50 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5108
Need to get Message-ID back after changed to X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID
Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:51:53 +0100
Eric Carlson <[email protected]> • #5107
Filtering message body
Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:31:28 +0530
"Jacob Mathew" <[email protected]> • #5106
Re: perl scan error
Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:51:11 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5105
perl scan error
Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:44:08 +0200
David Pisa <[email protected]> • #5104
Re: Trouble with new version
Sat, 01 Jul 2006 20:25:25 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5103
Trouble with new version
Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:49:42 +0200
David Pisa <[email protected]> • #5102
Bug in qmail-scanner version 1.25!
Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:34:40 +0200
"Alain Reutenauer" <[email protected]> • #5101
A small question => Logs or no virus ?
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:25:54 +0200
Noc Phibee <[email protected]> • #5100
Re: A small question => Logs or no virus ?
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:57:35 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5099
Re: A small question => Logs or no virus ?
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:50:02 +0200
Noc Phibee <[email protected]> • #5098
Re: A small question => Logs or no virus ?
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:43:51 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5097
Re: New version of st patch
Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:38:19 -0400
"Jason Staudenmayer" <[email protected]> • #5096
New version of st patch
Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:06:38 +0200
Salvatore Toribio <[email protected]> • #5095
custom rules not work in some conditions
Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:05:46 -0500 (CDT)
Alex Howansky <[email protected]> • #5094
Re: new feature request
Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:52:04 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5093
Re: new feature request
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:34:47 -0700
Jesse Sanford <[email protected]> • #5092
which header is _only_ show when spam message is found?
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:17:37 +0200
Rick van der Zwet <[email protected]> • #5091
new feature request
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:16:41 +0200
[email protected] • #5090
451 qq crashed (#4.3.0) / Q-S Segmentation Fault
Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:26:18 +0100
Andrew Liles <[email protected]> • #5089
Re: Disallowed MIME Content-Type/Disallowed content found in MIME attachment - not valid email; HELP!
Wed, 14 Jun 2006 17:00:05 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5088
Re: Bad_MIME_Break
Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:56:06 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #5087
Bad_MIME_Break
Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:08:22 -0400
"Roy Wills" <[email protected]> • #5086
Disallowed MIME Content-Type/Disallowed content found in MIME attachment - not valid email; HELP!
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 09:17:21 -0500
"Corbey, Clayton" <[email protected]> • #5085
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.