gmane.music.dadl.ot archive

7592 archived articles, newest first (page 23 of 76). Latest articles →

Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72058
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #72057
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #72056
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:51:35 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #72055
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:50:28 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #72054
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #72053
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:44:35 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72052
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:39:58 -0400
[email protected] • #72051
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:39:23 -0400
[email protected] • #72050
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:33:03 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72049
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #72048
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #72047
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72046
Re: nit-pick
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72045
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72044
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72043
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:07:56 -0400
[email protected] • #72042
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:16:09 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72041
Re: nit-pick
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:15:22 -0500
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #72040
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:15:20 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72039
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:03:41 -0400
[email protected] • #72038
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:00:53 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72037
nit-pick
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72036
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #72035
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:41:36 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72034
Re: The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:40:27 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72033
The case for hell
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #72032
God's bankers: How evangelical Christiani ty is taking a hold of the City of London’s financial i nstitutions - Business Analysis & Features, Business - The Independent
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:19:20 -0500
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #72031
The Liberal attack on Jack begins
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72030
Choc and Awe
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72029
the top ten movies in north america
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72028
Re: Kurt Loder?
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72027
Kurt Loder?
Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:01:48 -0500
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #72026
out of the frying pan, into the fire?
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72025
Tweets show Bloc on offensive as NDP leads polls in Quebec
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72024
Re: NYTimes: New Jersey Transit Worker, Fired After Burning Koran, Wins Back His Job
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:02:21 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #72023
Re: NYTimes: New Jersey Transit Worker, Fired After Burning Koran, Wins Back His Job
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:38:48 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72022
The Disappearing Dollar
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:35:11 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72021
Apple, Google Collect User Data
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72020
Re: Federal Fiat
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:22:46 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #72019
Re: NYTimes: New Jersey Transit Worker, Fired After Burning Koran, Wins Back His Job
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:12:58 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #72018
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:35:51 -0400
Ronald Hatton <[email protected]> • #72017
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72016
NYTimes: New Jersey Transit Worker, Fired After Burning Koran, Wins Back His Job
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:22:43 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72015
NYTimes: New Time Warp for ‘Doctor Who’
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:19:17 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72014
Amazon’s $23,698,655.93 book ab out flies
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:44:20 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72013
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:35:27 -0400
Ronald Hatton <[email protected]> • #72012
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:45:39 -0500
Paul Christian Glenn <[email protected]> • #72011
Federal Fiat
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 02:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72010
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:29:05 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #72009
Once a sure thing, Liberals now fighting for Jewish vote
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72008
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:02:40 -0400
Ronald Hatton <[email protected]> • #72007
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:59:20 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72006
Conservatives target NDP as Layton's party gains steam
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72005
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:19:00 -0500
"Richard Towry" <[email protected]> • #72004
Re: Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:54:20 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #72003
Censored Looney Tunes Revisited
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:09:42 -0400
Ronald Hatton <[email protected]> • #72002
The Human Right Not To Be "Offended"
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72001
Re: News Desk: What Mortenson Got Wrong : The New Yorker
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #72000
Mama Obama
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71999
Race and the Future of Entitlements
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71998
For politicians, it's any faith but their own
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71997
The Supreme Court: How a Harper majority could really change Canada
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71996
Is Harper prepared to do a King-Byng?
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71995
Re: News Desk: What Mortenson Got Wrong : The New Yorker
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 19:51:00 -0400
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #71994
Re: News Desk: What Mortenson Got Wrong : The New Yorker
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71993
Re: News Desk: What Mortenson Got Wrong : The New Yorker
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:14:30 -0500
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #71992
Re: News Desk: What Mortenson Got Wrong : The New Yorker
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:09:41 -0400
Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #71991
Re: News Desk: What Mortenson Got Wrong : The New Yorker
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:33:52 -0500
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #71990
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:42:58 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #71989
Anti-Harper voters may be reassessing leaders as campaign nears end
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71988
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:22:00 -0400
[email protected] • #71987
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:03:29 -0400
[email protected] • #71986
IP address can now pin down your location to within a half mile
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:00:48 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #71985
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:00:45 -0500
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #71984
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:59:47 -0400
[email protected] • #71983
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71982
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:52:58 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #71981
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:51:04 -0400
[email protected] • #71980
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71979
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:40:14 -0400
[email protected] • #71978
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71977
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:19:04 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #71976
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:14:00 -0400
[email protected] • #71975
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71974
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:53:20 -0400
[email protected] • #71973
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71972
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:24:53 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #71971
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:23:42 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #71970
Re: Polls suggest Obama far from a shoo-in to win the 2012 presidential election
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:09:15 -0400
[email protected] • #71969
Re: and leading her majesty's loyal opposition ... the NDP?
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71968
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71967
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:41:28 -0500
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]> • #71966
Re: and leading her majesty's loyal opposition ... the NDP?
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:38:24 -0400
The Voice Of Objective Truth <vox-TPv+D/[email protected]> • #71965
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:35:54 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #71964
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:32:35 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #71963
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71962
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:26:50 -0600
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #71961
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:21:32 -0700
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]> • #71960
Re: why birtherism might not matter, even if it's true ...
Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #71959
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.