gmane.network.syndication.rss.support archive

382 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Re: FriendFeed's Simple Update Protocol
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 01:17:39 -0800
"Charles Iliya Krempeaux" <[email protected]> • #1385
Re: FriendFeed's Simple Update Protocol
Sun, 07 Dec 2008 01:13:15 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1384
Re: FriendFeed's Simple Update Protocol
Sat, 6 Dec 2008 11:43:24 -0800
"Charles Iliya Krempeaux" <[email protected]> • #1383
Re: FriendFeed's Simple Update Protocol
Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:57:51 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1382
Re: FriendFeed's Simple Update Protocol
Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:45:29 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1381
FriendFeed's Simple Update Protocol
Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:48:42 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1380
Re: Feed Validator reports "misplaced item", seems wrong to me
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:41:23 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1379
Re: Need Some clarification on the RSS 2.0 Specifications
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:51:45 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1378
Need Some clarification on the RSS 2.0 Specifications
Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:13:32 -0000
"gandhirajendran" <[email protected]> • #1377
Re: Feed Validator reports "misplaced item", seems wrong to me
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:58:55 -0800
Ken Gorman <[email protected]> • #1376
Re: Feed Validator reports "misplaced item", seems wrong to me
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:12:21 -0500
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #1375
Re: Feed Validator reports "misplaced item", seems wrong to me
Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:17:03 -0800
Ken Gorman <[email protected]> • #1374
Re: Feed Validator reports "misplaced item", seems wrong to me
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:57:47 -0800
"Charles Iliya Krempeaux" <[email protected]> • #1373
Feed Validator reports "misplaced item", seems wrong to me
Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:27:49 -0000
"kengorman238" <[email protected]> • #1372
Not able to add my blogpost with Tamilmanam.net
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:06:20 -0000
"rb.ponnaih" <[email protected]> • #1371
Not able to add my blogpost with Tamilmanam.net
Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:06:45 -0000
"rb.ponnaih" <[email protected]> • #1370
Re: I've tried everything but cant fix my feed.
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:21:02 -0000
"neilm_365" <[email protected]> • #1369
Re: I've tried everything but cant fix my feed.
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:23:46 -0000
"neilm_365" <[email protected]> • #1368
Re: I've tried everything but cant fix my feed.
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:13:31 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1367
Re: I've tried everything but cant fix my feed.
Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:16:35 -0500
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> • #1366
I've tried everything but cant fix my feed.
Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:15:31 -0000
"neilm_365" <[email protected]> • #1365
Re: Re: hi everyone
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:58:46 -0400
WWWhatsup <[email protected]> • #1364
Re: hi everyone
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:59:29 -0000
"hisomers" <[email protected]> • #1363
Re: hi everyone
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:22:37 -0700
Ryan Parman <[email protected]> • #1362
hi everyone
Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:50:02 -0000
"hisomers" <[email protected]> • #1361
Re: Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:17:55 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #1360
Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:52:01 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1359
Re: Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:36:32 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #1358
Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:17:48 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1357
Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:37:43 +0200
Aristotle Pagaltzis <[email protected]> • #1356
Re: Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:32:55 +0200
Geoffrey Sneddon <[email protected]> • #1355
Re: Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:09:52 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1354
Adapting RSS-0.91/RSS-0.9 to the new hosting at http://www.rssboard.org/
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:29:19 +0200
Shlomi Fish <[email protected]> • #1353
Re: Re: What is the problem with my XML page
Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:02:59 +0530
"Binay Pandey" <[email protected]> • #1352
Re: What is the problem with my XML page
Mon, 22 Sep 2008 04:08:47 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1351
What is the problem with my XML page
Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:03:33 -0000
"Binay Kumar Pandey" <[email protected]> • #1350
Re: How to encode comments in a hierarchical manner?
Tue, 16 Sep 2008 01:41:02 -0000
"grishick" <[email protected]> • #1349
Re: How to encode comments in a hierarchical manner?
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:25:31 -0000
"scamden" <[email protected]> • #1348
Re: Re: How to encode comments in a hierarchical manner?
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:39:18 -0700
James M Snell <[email protected]> • #1347
Re: How to encode comments in a hierarchical manner?
Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:29:34 -0000
"scamden" <[email protected]> • #1346
Re: Re: How to encode comments in a hierarchical manner?
Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Gregory Solovyev <[email protected]> • #1345
Re: How to encode comments in a hierarchical manner?
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:30:49 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1344
How to encode comments in a hierarchical manner?
Sun, 14 Sep 2008 04:24:04 -0000
"grishick" <[email protected]> • #1343
Re: Re: Sam Ruby is a Vandal and a Lying Sack of Shit
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:07:55 -0400
WWWhatsup <[email protected]> • #1342
Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:00:11 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1341
Re: Sam Ruby ...
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:53:44 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1340
Re: Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:38:38 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #1339
Re: Re: Sam Ruby is a Vandal and a Lying Sack of Shit
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:56:11 -0700
James M Snell <[email protected]> • #1338
Re: Re: Sam Ruby is a Vandal and a Lying Sack of Shit
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:38:49 +0100
"James Holderness" <[email protected]> • #1337
FW: Sam Ruby is a vandal and a lying sack of shit
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:18:27 -0500
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1336
Re: Sam Ruby is a Vandal and a Lying Sack of Shit
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:18:27 -0500
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1335
Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 06:39:42 -0400
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> • #1334
Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:08:49 -0700
James M Snell <[email protected]> • #1333
Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:15:09 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1332
Re: feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:41:19 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #1331
feedvalidator.org turned into a biased and untrustworthy resource
Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:18:06 -0500
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1330
Re: Hail Fearless Leader
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:19:16 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1329
Re: Welcome RSS Dudes
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:32:28 -0000
"scamden" <[email protected]> • #1328
Hail Fearless Leader
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 14:33:28 -0500
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1327
Re: Welcome RSS Dudes
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:08:37 +0100
Geoffrey Sneddon <[email protected]> • #1326
Welcome RSS Dudes
Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:07:33 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1325
Re: Ressources on "rss saved searches" programming (rss feed in search results)
Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:43:42 -0000
"sogloubina" <[email protected]> • #1324
Re: Re: Ressources on "rss saved searches" programming (rss feed in search results)
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:57:11 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #1323
Re: Ressources on "rss saved searches" programming (rss feed in search results)
Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:48:04 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1322
Can someone help me?
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:07:26 -0000
"Blake Burdette" <[email protected]> • #1321
Ressources on "rss saved searches" programming (rss feed in search results)
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:08:30 -0000
"sogloubina" <[email protected]> • #1320
Re: "Language" as defined in Best Practices, etc.
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:14:14 -0000
"Addison Phillips" <[email protected]> • #1319
Re: last call comments: language tags and URIs?
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:33:51 -0400
Sam Ruby <[email protected]> • #1318
Re: "Language" as defined in Best Practices, etc.
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:21:27 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1317
last call comments: language tags and URIs?
Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:30:46 -0000
"Addison Phillips" <[email protected]> • #1316
Re: Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Thu, 29 May 2008 08:21:12 -0700
"Lucas Gonze" <[email protected]> • #1315
Re: Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Sun, 25 May 2008 10:35:01 -0700
"Lucas Gonze" <[email protected]> • #1314
Re: Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Sun, 25 May 2008 07:29:35 -0400
WWWhatsup <[email protected]> • #1313
Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Sat, 24 May 2008 15:30:58 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1312
Re: Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Sat, 24 May 2008 08:07:48 -0700
Ryan Parman <[email protected]> • #1311
Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Sat, 24 May 2008 15:05:51 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1310
Re: Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Tue, 13 May 2008 16:29:24 -0400
WWWhatsup <[email protected]> • #1309
Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Wed, 14 May 2008 20:37:42 -0000
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1308
Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Tue, 13 May 2008 20:58:28 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1307
Re: Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Tue, 13 May 2008 21:36:25 +0100
"James Holderness" <[email protected]> • #1306
Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Tue, 13 May 2008 19:25:22 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1305
Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Tue, 13 May 2008 12:21:58 -0700
"Lucas Gonze" <[email protected]> • #1304
Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Tue, 13 May 2008 13:42:29 -0500
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1303
Re: Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Tue, 13 May 2008 13:48:59 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1302
Are enclosures downloaded or linked?
Fri, 2 May 2008 18:51:36 -0500
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1301
Not getting daily digest for rss-public
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:53:22 -0500
"Clinton Gallagher" <[email protected]> • #1300
Re: Re: Plus-separated categories
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 22:30:35 +0100
"James Holderness" <[email protected]> • #1299
Re: Plus-separated categories
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:17:20 -0000
"scamden" <[email protected]> • #1298
Re: Plus-separated categories
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:34:47 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1297
Plus-separated categories
Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:58:11 -0000
"Victor Porton" <[email protected]> • #1296
Re: [rss-media] article about media rss and transmission metadata standard
Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:28:25 -0700
Ryan Parman <[email protected]> • #1295
Re: Offering Multiple Feed Formats
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:36:49 +0100
Aristotle Pagaltzis <[email protected]> • #1294
Offering Multiple Feed Formats
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:22:39 -0000
"rcade" <[email protected]> • #1293
Re: File name length on enclosures
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:14:06 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1292
Re: File name length on enclosures
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:03:36 -0400
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> • #1291
Re: File name length on enclosures
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:04:14 -0000
"scamden" <[email protected]> • #1290
Re: File name length on enclosures
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:02:21 -0000
"scamden" <[email protected]> • #1289
Re: File name length on enclosures
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 08:55:15 -0400
"Bill Kearney" <[email protected]> • #1288
Re: File name length on enclosures
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:28:06 -0000
"Randy Morin" <[email protected]> • #1287
Re: Re: File name length on enclosures
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:34:22 -0700
Ryan Parman <[email protected]> • #1286
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.