gmane.os.freedos.devel archive

382 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Dosemu
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 21:52:51 -0500
George Bell <[email protected]> • #1212
Re: Re: Comment on Memory Management FAQ
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 03:46:58 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1211
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Sat, 09 Nov 2002 03:57:05 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1210
Re: Success running Descent...
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 21:32:56 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1209
re: re: Re: Beta vs. Stable
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 03:33:05 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1208
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Sat, 09 Nov 2002 03:40:55 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1207
Re: Comment on Memory Management FAQ
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 21:27:07 -0500
George Bell <[email protected]> • #1206
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:48:53 -0500
Kenneth J Davis <[email protected]> • #1205
FreeDOS config.sys and batch menu example: My fdconfig.sys, fdauto.bat
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 03:10:37 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1204
Success running Descent...
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 02:37:57 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1203
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:26:01 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1202
re: Re: Beta vs. Stable
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 20:23:57 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1201
UNDELETE for Linux "bug", lengthy mail over FreeCOM versus COUNT
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 02:16:26 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1200
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 04:03:01 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1199
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 03:49:16 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1198
re: Re: Beta vs. Stable
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 01:45:51 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1197
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 19:27:44 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1196
Re: Beta vs. Stable
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:16:19 -0500
"Brian E. Reifsnyder" <[email protected]> • #1195
re: Commercial use of FreeDOS / BETA status and missing features
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 00:40:23 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1194
Re: Commercial use of FreeDOS
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 00:50:26 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1193
Beta vs. Stable
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 18:28:59 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1192
Re: Commercial use of FreeDOS
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 18:18:48 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1191
Re: Commercial use of FreeDOS
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 11:59:10 -0500
Jack Dodds <[email protected]> • #1190
Re: Commercial use of FreeDOS
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 16:25:53 +0100
tom ehlert <[email protected]> • #1189
Re: plain or HTML?
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:21:31 -0600
Jim Hall <[email protected]> • #1188
Re: Commercial use of FreeDOS
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:21:03 -0600
Jim Hall <[email protected]> • #1187
Commercial use of FreeDOS
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 08:48:08 -0500
Jack Dodds <[email protected]> • #1186
Smartdrv compatibility
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 13:02:00 +0100
tom ehlert <[email protected]> • #1185
AWK - Eric's questions
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 07:38:04 +0100
Krzysztof Suchecki <[email protected]> • #1184
re: Comment on Memory Management FAQ
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 05:58:06 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1183
New version of MetaKern now online - allows booting A:/B:/C: as well
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 05:07:40 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1182
Re: Second BONUS release for tonight: TEXT2COM - make .com out of .txt
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:35:10 EST
[email protected] • #1181
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 22:42:37 EST
[email protected] • #1180
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:06:33 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1179
Second BONUS release for tonight: TEXT2COM - make .com out of .txt
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 03:49:55 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1178
Comment on Memory Management FAQ
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 21:49:11 -0500
George Bell <[email protected]> • #1177
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Fri, 08 Nov 2002 02:57:15 +0100
Paul Case <[email protected]> • #1176
Bonus software releae: The TURBO3 screen output speedup TSR
Fri, 8 Nov 2002 00:23:21 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1175
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:32:22 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1174
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 23:28:13 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1173
Re: C Compilers
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 15:10:03 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1172
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:46:20 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1171
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:58:54 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1170
New tools released: COUNT and MIRR*.BAT, UNDELETE updated, varia.
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:25:30 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1169
Re: plain or HTML?
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 17:08:03 +0100
Florian Xaver <[email protected]> • #1168
plain or HTML?
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:42:04 +0100
Bernd Blaauw <[email protected]> • #1167
Re: FreeCOM 083beta50 display error.
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:18:46 +0100
Bernd Blaauw <[email protected]> • #1166
FreeCOM 083beta50 display error.
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:14:10 +0100
Bernd Blaauw <[email protected]> • #1165
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:43:21 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1164
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:38:07 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1163
Re: C Compilers
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 13:20:14 +0100
Paul Case <[email protected]> • #1162
Re: C Compilers
Thu, 07 Nov 2002 11:20:37 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1161
Re: Known Bugs
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 10:12:33 +0100
"Andreas K. Foerster" <[email protected]> • #1160
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 09:05:47 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #1159
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:59:44 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #1158
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:43:21 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #1157
Re: Pascal Compilers
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:58:59 +0100
Krzysztof Suchecki <[email protected]> • #1156
Re: Pascal Compilers
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 07:16:33 +0100
Krzysztof Suchecki <[email protected]> • #1155
Re: C Compilers
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 23:02:33 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1154
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:46:09 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1153
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 04:31:42 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1152
Re: C Compilers
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:51:00 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] • #1151
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 01:46:43 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1150
re: RE: Pascal Compilers (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ?
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 00:27:48 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1149
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Thu, 7 Nov 2002 01:50:08 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1148
Re: C Compilers
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 23:35:06 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1147
Re: C Compilers
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 17:09:14 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1146
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 16:58:46 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1145
Re: C Compilers
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:58:57 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1144
Re: Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:46:38 +0100
Steffen Kaiser <[email protected]> • #1143
Feedback needed on BOOTING, CACHING and some HELPER TOOL
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:34:14 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1142
[ANN] FreeCOM v0.83 Beta 50 released
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 22:28:24 +0100
Steffen Kaiser <[email protected]> • #1141
Re: Known Bugs (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about com
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 16:01:56 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1140
Re: OLD kernel BUG with volume label? (MS works,2026..2027rc not)
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 15:55:49 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1139
Re: Pascal (and C) Compilers
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:56:34 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1138
RE: Terminal feedback -> Terminal update / Packaging help wanted
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 20:36:49 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1137
Re: Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about compatibility inste
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 19:35:06 +0100
Steffen Kaiser <[email protected]> • #1136
Re: Pascal Compilers
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 16:54:31 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1135
Re: Pascal Compilers
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:18:34 +0100
"Andreas K. Foerster" <[email protected]> • #1134
Re: BOCHS news
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:29:11 -0000
Jas Sandys-Lumsdaine <[email protected]> • #1133
Re: Pascal Compilers (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk abou
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 15:37:09 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1132
RE: Pascal Compilers (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk ab
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:20:32 +0200
Kristaps Kaupe <[email protected]> • #1131
RE: Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about compatibility instea
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 09:10:43 -0500
"Christopher M. Gibbs" <[email protected]> • #1130
Re: Pascal Compilers (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk abou
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:38:06 +0100
Krzysztof Suchecki <[email protected]> • #1129
Re: BOCHS news
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 12:22:37 +0100
Krzysztof Suchecki <[email protected]> • #1128
Re: Pascal Compilers (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk abou
Wed, 06 Nov 2002 11:35:06 +0100
Aitor Santamaria Merino <[email protected]> • #1127
Known Bugs (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about compatib
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 08:41:18 +0100
"Andreas K. Foerster" <[email protected]> • #1126
Pascal Compilers (was:Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about co
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 08:54:19 +0100
"Andreas K. Foerster" <[email protected]> • #1125
Re: OLD kernel BUG with volume label? (MS works,2026..2027rc not)
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 10:28:52 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1124
New version of DRL, the dirlister with color and sorting now online
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 06:56:32 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1123
Re: OLD kernel BUG with volume label? (MS works,2026..2027rc not)
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 21:07:23 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1122
Re: OLD kernel BUG with volume label? (MS works,2026..2027rc not)
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 04:20:24 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1121
Re: OLD kernel BUG with volume label? (MS works,2026..2027rc not)
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 20:00:45 -0500 (EST)
Bart Oldeman <[email protected]> • #1120
Re: Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about compatibility inste
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 21:39:36 -0300
Exe NO Dark <[email protected]> • #1119
Re: Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about compatibility inste
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 21:39:45 -0300
Exe NO Dark <[email protected]> • #1118
Re: Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about compatibility inste
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 21:39:27 -0300
Exe NO Dark <[email protected]> • #1117
Compilers needed for FreeDOS ? Lets talk about compatibility instead...
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 01:04:19 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1116
You can say to me what compilators i need to compile FreeDOS?
Tue, 05 Nov 2002 20:07:12 -0300
Exe NO Dark <[email protected]> • #1115
Re: OLD kernel BUG with volume label? (MS works,2026..2027rc not)
Wed, 6 Nov 2002 00:01:16 +0300 (MSK)
"Arkady V.Belousov" <[email protected]> • #1114
Re: OLD kernel BUG with volume label? (MS works,2026..2027rc not)
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 21:53:19 +0100 (MET)
Eric Auer <[email protected]> • #1113
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.