gmane.text.xml.xtm.general archive

624 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 7). Latest articles →

Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:27:43 +0200
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #5277
Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:24:55 +0200
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #5276
Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:19:56 +0200
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #5275
Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:19:35 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5274
Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:42:42 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5273
Re: TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 10:23:11 +0100
Simon Grant <[email protected]> • #5272
TMRM: isa/sub - irreflexive relation vs. reflexive relation
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:05:41 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5271
Re: Chaining and mixing of supertype-subtype and type-instance relationships
Wed, 05 Oct 2011 08:16:17 +0200
Johannes Schmidt <[email protected]> • #5270
Re: Chaining and mixing of supertype-subtype and type-instance relationships
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:42:46 +0200
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #5269
Re: Chaining and mixing of supertype-subtype and type-instance relationships
Tue, 04 Oct 2011 08:09:22 +0200
Johannes Schmidt <[email protected]> • #5268
Re: Chaining and mixing of supertype-subtype and type-instance relationships
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 06:09:13 +0200
Robert Barta <[email protected]> • #5267
Chaining and mixing of supertype-subtype and type-instance relationships
Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:38:47 +0200
Johannes Schmidt <[email protected]> • #5266
ANN: PHPTMAPI 2.1 released
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 21:30:01 +0200
Johannes Schmidt <[email protected]> • #5265
Topic similarity measures (in context of Topic Maps)
Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:54:29 +0300
Aki Kivela <[email protected]> • #5264
Re: Building a (semantic) application
Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:53:26 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5263
Re: Building a (semantic) application
Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:58:51 -0500
Mike Bergman <[email protected]> • #5262
Building a (semantic) application
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:56:33 -0300
Sebastian Samaruga <[email protected]> • #5261
Questions for Topic Map mailing list
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:29:03 -0700
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5260
Re: Ontopia now supports numbers in tolog
Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:25:33 +0200
Aad Kamsteeg <[email protected]> • #5259
Ontopia now supports numbers in tolog
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:13:33 +0200
Peter-Paul Kruijsen <[email protected]> • #5258
ANN: QuaaxTM 0.7.0 released
Sun, 28 Aug 2011 19:17:09 +0200
Johannes Schmidt <[email protected]> • #5257
Ooops!
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:14:15 +0200
"Steve Pepper" <[email protected]> • #5256
Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:56:46 +0000 (UTC)
Steve Pepper via LinkedIn <member-mkn/cI4rzrdWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #5255
[CFP] The Joint International Semantic Technology Conference (JIST 2011, deadline extended to 29 Aug, 2011)
Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:29:36 +0100
Jeff Pan <jeffpan.sw-gM/[email protected]> • #5254
Re: LDA Topic Model and Topic Maps
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:54:46 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5253
Re: LDA Topic Model and Topic Maps
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:22:27 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5252
Re: LDA Topic Model and Topic Maps
Thu, 4 Aug 2011 12:18:59 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5251
Re: LDA Topic Model and Topic Maps
Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:56:26 +0300
Aki Kivela <[email protected]> • #5250
Re: LDA Topic Model and Topic Maps
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 20:36:15 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5249
Re: LDA Topic Model and Topic Maps
Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:23:06 -0400
Steve Newcomb <srn-yd/[email protected]> • #5248
LDA Topic Model and Topic Maps
Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:41:27 -0700
Antonisamy Arokiasamy <[email protected]> • #5247
[CFP] ISWC'11 Workshop on Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering
Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:36:12 +0100
Jeff Pan <jeffpan.sw-gM/[email protected]> • #5246
Leggi il tuo messaggio prima che sia eliminato!
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:03:26 +0000
Badoo <[email protected]> • #5245
Hai ricevuto un messaggio da Javier Daniel Ladiana...
Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:07:30 +0000
Badoo <[email protected]> • #5244
WG3 Teleconference, 11:00 UTC on 2011-10-07
Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:30:35 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5243
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:54:04 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5242
Re: Topic maps and ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:20:17 -0400
Robert Parks <[email protected]> • #5241
Re: Topic maps and ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:18:45 -0400
Robert Parks <[email protected]> • #5240
Re: Topic maps and ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:55:55 +0100
"Linda.Sutherland" <linda.sutherland-k881bfVVboVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #5239
Re: Topic maps and ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:20:00 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5238
Re: Topic maps and ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:02:57 +0100
Simon Grant <[email protected]> • #5237
Topic maps and ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:32:26 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5236
Re: Convincing ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:38:41 +1200
Murray Altheim <[email protected]> • #5235
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:52:30 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5234
Re: Convincing ordinary people
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:38:15 +0300
Aki Kivela <[email protected]> • #5233
Re: TMQL - Some thoughts
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:28:37 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5232
TMQL - Some thoughts
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:26:28 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5231
Re: Convincing ordinary people
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:20:43 +0100
"Linda.Sutherland" <linda.sutherland-k881bfVVboVWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #5230
Re: Convincing ordinary people
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:33:56 +1000
Alexander Johannesen <[email protected]> • #5229
Convincing ordinary people
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:01:51 +0100
Simon Grant <[email protected]> • #5228
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:12:27 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5227
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:41:34 +0200
Rani Pinchuk <rani.pinchuk-tztinFsz/[email protected]> • #5226
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:06:14 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5225
Re: schema.org
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:49:07 -0400
Robert Parks <[email protected]> • #5224
Re: schema.org
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:27:47 -0400
Robert Parks <[email protected]> • #5223
Re: schema.org
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 11:29:08 +1000
Alexander Johannesen <[email protected]> • #5222
Re: schema.org
Mon, 06 Jun 2011 19:58:33 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5221
Re: schema.org
Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:04:54 +1000
Alexander Johannesen <[email protected]> • #5220
Re: schema.org
Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:54:25 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5219
Re: schema.org
Mon, 6 Jun 2011 17:51:45 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5218
schema.org
Mon, 06 Jun 2011 11:16:16 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5217
Meeting in Busan, Korea 2011-09-26/30?
Mon, 06 Jun 2011 06:00:11 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5216
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:31:17 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5215
Fwd: Re: Latest on TMQL?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:10:00 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5214
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 12:18:57 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5213
Re: Latest on TMQL?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:13:01 +0000
Inge Henriksen <[email protected]> • #5212
Latest on TMQL?
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 11:05:28 +0100
"Andrew S. Townley" <[email protected]> • #5211
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol for Topic Maps
Mon, 30 May 2011 15:36:37 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5210
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol for Topic Maps
Wed, 25 May 2011 09:11:28 +0200
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #5209
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol for Topic Maps
Tue, 24 May 2011 22:49:19 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5208
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol for Topic Maps
Tue, 24 May 2011 21:44:06 +0200
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]> • #5207
SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol for Topic Maps
Mon, 23 May 2011 12:34:21 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5206
Re: using TMCL-constraints
Wed, 18 May 2011 10:32:23 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5205
Re: using TMCL-constraints
Wed, 18 May 2011 10:17:31 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5204
Re: using TMCL-constraints
Tue, 17 May 2011 14:35:18 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5203
Re: using TMCL-constraints
Tue, 17 May 2011 13:19:55 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5202
Re: using TMCL-constraints
Tue, 17 May 2011 12:02:42 +0200
Hannes Niederhausen <h.niederhausen-gM/[email protected]> • #5201
using TMCL-constraints
Tue, 17 May 2011 10:50:37 +0200
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #5200
ANN: Oomap Loomap 0.0.3
Sun, 15 May 2011 11:26:24 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5199
Re: ANN: Oomap Loomap
Fri, 13 May 2011 10:26:26 +0200
"Marcel Hoyer" <[email protected]> • #5198
Re: ANN: Oomap Loomap
Thu, 12 May 2011 11:02:40 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5197
Re: ANN: Oomap Loomap
Thu, 12 May 2011 01:32:26 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5196
Re: ANN: Oomap Loomap
Thu, 12 May 2011 00:23:01 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5195
ANN: Oomap Loomap
Wed, 11 May 2011 23:34:28 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5194
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Wed, 11 May 2011 09:18:15 -0400
Steve Newcomb <srn-yd/[email protected]> • #5193
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Wed, 11 May 2011 09:09:57 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5192
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Tue, 10 May 2011 16:50:46 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5191
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Tue, 10 May 2011 18:27:26 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5190
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Tue, 10 May 2011 18:23:09 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5189
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Tue, 10 May 2011 17:13:35 +0100
Richard Light <richard-wLOraGfDqaUCqOQrDF6SL1pr/1R2p/[email protected]> • #5188
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Tue, 10 May 2011 18:01:31 +0200
Lars Heuer <[email protected]> • #5187
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Mon, 9 May 2011 13:23:42 +0100
"Andrew S. Townley" <[email protected]> • #5186
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Mon, 9 May 2011 10:52:43 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5185
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Mon, 09 May 2011 10:47:22 +0300
Aki Kivela <[email protected]> • #5184
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Sun, 08 May 2011 19:00:12 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5183
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Sun, 8 May 2011 23:06:29 +0100
"Andrew S. Townley" <[email protected]> • #5182
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Sun, 8 May 2011 23:16:37 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5181
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Sun, 8 May 2011 22:59:52 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5180
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Sun, 08 May 2011 16:57:51 -0400
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]> • #5179
Re: Temporal validitity of subject indicators?
Sun, 8 May 2011 22:44:30 +0200
Robert Cerny <[email protected]> • #5178
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.