gmane.comp.freedesktop.xlibs.general archive

298 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 3). Latest articles →

Re: [PATCH] remove all ^L from libX11
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:39:08 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #198
Re: [PATCH] remove all ^L from libX11
Tue, 02 Mar 2004 04:36:42 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #197
More V I_A G_R A_more_P_O_W E_R_[id:41752075]
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:13:36 -0600
"Tia Fritz" <[email protected]> • #196
Re: [PATCH] remove all ^L from libX11
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:25:41 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #195
Re: [PATCH] remove all ^L from libX11
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 09:08:52 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #194
[PATCH] remove all ^L from libX11
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 07:32:06 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #193
[PATCH] fix some #endif comments
Mon, 01 Mar 2004 07:34:23 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #192
help!!! Xserver de Freedesktop don't want to compil, I miss a executable...
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 04:44:55 +0100
Rapsys|Phoenix <[email protected]> • #191
help!!! Xserver de Freedesktop don't want to compil, I miss a executable...
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 04:44:40 +0100
Rapsys|Phoenix <[email protected]> • #190
help!!! Xserver de Freedesktop don't want to compil, I miss a executable...
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 04:47:00 +0100
Rapsys|Phoenix <[email protected]> • #189
Read This Broextraviar
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:37:22 +0600
"opalina mertes" <ptbdfepgfj-/[email protected]> • #188
Re: Xft, RANDR and subpixel aliasing
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:06:34 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #187
Re: Xft, RANDR and subpixel aliasing
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:29:02 +0100 (CET)
Wout Mertens <[email protected]> • #186
Re: Xft, RANDR and subpixel aliasing
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:15:51 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #185
Xft, RANDR and subpixel aliasing
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:57:15 +0100 (CET)
Wout Mertens <[email protected]> • #184
Re: libXft won't compile: FC_HINT_STYLE undeclared
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:50:40 -0500
Peter Winton <[email protected]> • #183
Re: libXft won't compile: FC_HINT_STYLE undeclared
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:17:04 -0500
Peter Winton <[email protected]> • #182
Drawing on the root window background
Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:59:20 +0100
Benjamin Dauvergne <feanor-K+6jEx8/[email protected]> • #181
Re: libXft won't compile: FC_HINT_STYLE undeclared
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:37:00 +0100
Jan van Dijk <jan-H5POoP6h87iAZU/h/aScZ/[email protected]> • #180
Re: libXft won't compile: FC_HINT_STYLE undeclared
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:58:36 -0500
Peter Winton <[email protected]> • #179
Re: libXft won't compile: FC_HINT_STYLE undeclared
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:05:58 -0500
Peter Winton <[email protected]> • #178
Re: libXft won't compile: FC_HINT_STYLE undeclared
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:20:47 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #177
libXft won't compile: FC_HINT_STYLE undeclared
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:54:15 -0500
Peter Winton <[email protected]> • #176
Re: Re: Relicensing the code tree
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:18:30 +0100
Kristof vansant <[email protected]> • #175
Re: Relicensing the code tree
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:04:53 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #174
Relicensing the code tree
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:53:25 +0200
[email protected] • #173
Re: I made a Opengl package but don't know needed libs to build
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:11:15 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #172
Re: I have packaged imake with autoconf can someone check it out?
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:37:51 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #171
I made a Opengl package but don't know needed libs to build
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:50:16 +0100
Kristof vansant <[email protected]> • #170
Re: same filename but different checksum
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:34:44 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #169
I have packaged imake with autoconf can someone check it out?
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:49:05 +0100
Kristof vansant <[email protected]> • #168
Re: same filename but different checksum
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 01:10:34 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #167
same filename but different checksum
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 06:06:42 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #166
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:24:50 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #165
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:08:24 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #164
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:04:11 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #163
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:03:34 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #162
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 17:09:29 -0600
Jeff Carr <[email protected]> • #161
Re: CVS tag confusion
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:02:38 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #160
CVS tag confusion
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 12:52:57 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #159
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:24:35 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #158
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 06:38:05 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #157
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:04:06 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #156
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:43:54 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #155
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:10:48 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #154
Re: Xmd.h in c99 form
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:03:39 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #153
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:13:42 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #152
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:15:13 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #151
Xmd.h in c99 form
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:08:38 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #150
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:16:17 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #149
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:49:51 -0500
Dave Dodge <[email protected]> • #148
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:11:42 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #147
Re: Problems with using libXt
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:55:58 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #146
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:24:20 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #145
Re: Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:26:07 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith-UdXhSnd/[email protected]> • #144
Re: Problems with using libXt
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:48:03 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #143
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:13:01 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #142
Problems with using libXt
Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:59:30 +0600
Alexander Golubev <[email protected]> • #141
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:29:48 -0500
Dave Dodge <[email protected]> • #140
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:21:51 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #139
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:11:51 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #138
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Wed, 11 Feb 2004 15:02:46 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #137
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:19:31 -0500
Dave Dodge <[email protected]> • #136
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:26:37 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #135
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:48:52 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #134
Re: is xext.pc same as xextensions.pc?
Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:51:52 +0600
Alexander Golubev <[email protected]> • #133
is xext.pc same as xextensions.pc?
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:28:45 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #132
I don't have _POSIX_REENTRANT_FUNCTIONS (need help with libX11)
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:57:30 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #131
libXau_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 0:0:0
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:10:39 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #130
Re: Where is the `Xalloca.h'?
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:38:49 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #129
Re: Where is the `Xalloca.h'?
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 19:29:49 +0100 (CET)
Dirk-Jan Heijs <[email protected]> • #128
Re: Where is the `Xalloca.h'?
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:38:04 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #127
Re: COPYING files....
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:09:00 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #126
Re: [cairo] COPYING files....
Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:28:25 +0100
Egbert Eich <eich-u7BhqnqprCWvj1b/[email protected]> • #125
Where is the `Xalloca.h'?
Mon, 09 Feb 2004 11:08:36 +0600
Alexander Golubev <[email protected]> • #124
Re: Using keysymdef.h from /usr/include
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 08:45:25 -0800
Jamey Sharp <[email protected]> • #123
Using keysymdef.h from /usr/include
Sat, 07 Feb 2004 08:53:11 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #122
[cairo] COPYING files....
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:32:42 -0500
Carl Worth <cworth-Q8lfr43WVWL2fBVCVOL8/[email protected]> • #121
COPYING files....
Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:37:11 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #120
Re: what do you use for replacing all (or parts) of XFree86-clients?
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:52:28 +0100
Egbert Eich <eich-u7BhqnqprCWvj1b/[email protected]> • #119
xfree86 patchsets for review
Thu, 05 Feb 2004 01:55:28 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #118
Re: what do you use for replacing all (or parts) of XFree86-clients?
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:23:35 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #117
Re: what do you use for replacing all (or parts) of XFree86-clients?
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:08:53 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #116
Re: what do you use for replacing all (or parts) of XFree86-clients?
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:46:43 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #115
Re: what do you use for replacing all (or parts) of XFree86-clients?
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:22:09 -0500
Jim Gettys <[email protected]> • #114
what do you use for replacing all (or parts) of XFree86-clients?
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:09:39 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #113
Re: XF86 final sync patch audit
Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:15:12 -0500 (EST)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #112
XF86 final sync patch audit
Mon, 02 Feb 2004 15:07:19 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #111
Re: patches for Xt
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:51:36 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #110
Re: gle needs Xmu with needs libXext
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:00:51 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #109
Re: patches for Xt
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 08:56:33 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #108
gle needs Xmu with needs libXext
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 23:45:56 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #107
Re: patches for Xt
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 22:55:31 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #106
Re: patches for Xt
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:52:45 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #105
build failure on NetBSD, wrong use of install(1)? and DISTCLEANFILES removes needed files
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:47:25 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #104
patches for Xt
Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:12:57 -0800 (PST)
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[email protected]> • #103
Re: [announce] freedesktop.org xlibs 1.0
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 03:28:14 -0800
Eric Anholt <[email protected]> • #102
[announce] freedesktop.org xlibs 1.0
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:05:20 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #101
Re: ansification of XUtil.h
Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:57:51 +0100
Luciano Montanaro <[email protected]> • #100
ansification of XUtil.h
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:30:31 -0600
Warren Turkal <wt-3Q/uRndAOlBJm/[email protected]> • #99
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.