gmane.comp.graphics.chromium.devel archive

407 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: Query: SPU development and Bucket Information?
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 09:20:48 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #1005
Query: SPU development and Bucket Information?
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:32:09 -0700
"James Supancic" <[email protected]> • #1004
Re: Dropping unneeded glDrawElements calls?
Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:07:55 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #1002
Re: Dropping unneeded glDrawElements calls?
Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:07:40 -0700
"James Supancic" <[email protected]> • #1001
Re: Dropping unneeded glDrawElements calls?
Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:14:13 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #1000
Dropping unneeded glDrawElements calls?
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 15:05:27 -0700
"James Supancic" <[email protected]> • #999
Re: Patch for windows
Sat, 02 Sep 2006 14:15:32 +0200
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #998
Chromium 1.9 released
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:19:49 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #997
Re: Patch for windows
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:03:24 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #996
Re: Patch for windows
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 18:08:09 +0200
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #995
Re: Patch for windows
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:20:36 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #994
Patch for windows
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:34:39 +0200
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #993
Re: Patch for head tracking
Thu, 24 Aug 2006 00:37:32 +0200
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #992
Re: Patch for head tracking
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:06:36 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #991
Re: Patch for head tracking
Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:42:54 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #990
Patch for head tracking
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:27:57 +0200
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #989
Re: Chromium performance
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:49:57 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #988
Re: Chromium performance
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:47:44 -0400
Andres Lagar Cavilla <[email protected]> • #987
Re: Chromium performance
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:32:16 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #986
Trying to use gprof on Chromium?
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:04:14 -0700
"James Supancic" <[email protected]> • #985
Re: Display list management
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:30:07 -0600
Robert Ellison <[email protected]> • #984
Re: Display list management
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:42:49 -0700
"James Supancic" <[email protected]> • #983
Chromium performance
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:17:09 -0400
Andres Lagar Cavilla <[email protected]> • #982
Display list management
Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:50:59 -0400
Andres Lagar Cavilla <[email protected]> • #981
Chromium 1.9 release candidate 4
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:19:19 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #980
Re: [Chromium-users] Re: Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 15:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Sandall <[email protected]> • #976
Re: [Chromium-users] Re: Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 16:11:59 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #975
Re: Re: [Chromium-dev] Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 14:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Sandall <[email protected]> • #974
Re: Re: [Chromium-dev] Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 15:35:48 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #973
Re: Re: [Chromium-dev] Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 14:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Sandall <[email protected]> • #972
Re: Re: [Chromium-dev] Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 17:19:42 -0400
Michael Barnes <[email protected]> • #971
Re: [Chromium-users] Re: Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 13:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Sandall <[email protected]> • #970
Re: [Chromium-users] Re: Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 13:31:16 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #969
Re: [Chromium-users] Re: Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 12:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Sandall <[email protected]> • #968
Re: Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 14:13:43 -0500
Christopher Waters <[email protected]> • #967
Re: [Chromium-dev] Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Wed, 24 May 2006 13:00:24 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #966
Chromium 1.9 second release candidate
Fri, 19 May 2006 10:40:26 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #965
Re: Patch for building on Windows
Wed, 17 May 2006 09:18:05 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #964
Re: SourceForge CVS changes
Tue, 16 May 2006 11:39:40 -0400
Sean Ahern <[email protected]> • #963
Re: [Chromium-dev] SourceForge CVS changes
Tue, 16 May 2006 11:39:40 -0400
Sean Ahern <[email protected]> • #962
Re: SourceForge CVS changes
Tue, 16 May 2006 09:07:47 -0600
Robert Ellison <[email protected]> • #961
SourceForge CVS changes
Fri, 12 May 2006 15:21:09 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #960
Patch for building on Windows
Tue, 16 May 2006 12:11:43 +0200
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #959
Re: Error in stereo.conf
Tue, 09 May 2006 09:36:10 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #958
Error in stereo.conf
Tue, 09 May 2006 13:49:59 +0200
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #957
Chromium 1.9 release candidate
Mon, 01 May 2006 09:39:05 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #955
Cr 1.9 prep
Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:30:23 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #954
Re: Re: Source for Cr overhead
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:02:03 -0400
"Niraj Tolia" <[email protected]> • #953
Re: Re: Source for Cr overhead
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:53:17 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #952
Re: Source for Cr overhead
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:05:45 -0400
"Niraj Tolia" <[email protected]> • #951
Re: Source for Cr overhead
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 07:40:41 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #950
Re: Request for CVS tarball
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:31:03 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #949
Request for CVS tarball
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:45:34 -0400
"Niraj Tolia" <[email protected]> • #948
Re: [RFC] Patch for VNC SPU getting "stuck"
Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:12:15 -0500
"Niraj Tolia" <[email protected]> • #947
Re: [RFC] Patch for VNC SPU getting "stuck"
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:26:52 -0700
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #946
[RFC] Patch for VNC SPU getting "stuck"
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:23:38 -0500
"Niraj Tolia" <[email protected]> • #945
Re: Windows broken build
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:58:35 -0700
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #944
Windows broken build
Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:12:13 +0100
Michael Dürig <[email protected]> • #943
Re: VNC SPU not sending frame updates, currDirtyRegion being the cause
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:03:11 -0700
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #942
VNC SPU not sending frame updates, currDirtyRegion being the cause
Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:49:15 -0500
Andres Lagar Cavilla <[email protected]> • #941
Re: [PATCH] vncspu.c
Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:08:56 -0700
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #940
[PATCH] vncspu.c
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:25:21 -0500
"Niraj Tolia" <[email protected]> • #939
Re: [PATCH] Fix cvs build
Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:40:43 -0700
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #938
[PATCH] Fix cvs build
Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:43:35 -0500
Niraj Tolia <[email protected]> • #937
Re: Status of Infiniband network layer?
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:43:42 -0800
Mike Houston <[email protected]> • #935
Status of Infiniband network layer?
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:37:32 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #934
Re: Break in build on Windows in tilesortspu (THREADSAFE on, amlost cvs state)
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:17:20 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #933
Break in build on Windows in tilesortspu (THREADSAFE on, amlost cvs state)
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:14:50 +0200
"Maciej Donotek" <[email protected]> • #932
Re: Break in build on Windows in crdlm (THREADSAFE on, cvs state)
Tue, 04 Oct 2005 10:24:37 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #931
Break in build on Windows in crdlm (THREADSAFE on, cvs state)
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 15:16:00 +0200
"Maciej Donotek" <[email protected]> • #930
OSX or YDL?
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:05:52 -0800
"J.R. Manes" <[email protected]> • #929
(no subject)
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:01:42 +0200
"Stefan Lietsch" <[email protected]> • #928
Re: cluster recommendations?
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:56:28 -0700
Mike Houston <[email protected]> • #927
cluster recommendations?
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:02:33 -0800
"J.R. Manes" <[email protected]> • #926
Multi-line options not allowed? file networking
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
"Daniel B. Faken" <[email protected]> • #925
Re: SPU compile problem
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:16:22 +0000
"???? ??" <[email protected]> • #924
Re: SPU compile problem
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:16:37 +0000
"???? ??" <[email protected]> • #923
Re: SPU compile problem
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:42:09 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #922
Re: SPU compile problem
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:23:26 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #921
SPU compile problem
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:10:49 +0000
"???? ??" <[email protected]> • #920
[ANN] Alpha version of Scripting bindings to Chromium available
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:47:17 -0400 (EDT)
"Daniel B. Faken" <[email protected]> • #919
Re: Possible problem in crStateTransformDiff (state_transform.c)
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:53:52 -0600
[email protected] • #918
Suggested changes to pixel.c and tilesort's diffapi.py
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 15:43:08 -0600
[email protected] • #917
RE: Possible problem in crStateTransformDiff (state_transform.c)
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:20:22 -0600
[email protected] • #916
RE: Possible problem in crStateTransformDiff ( state_transform.c)
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:56:51 -0600
"Wylie, Brian" <[email protected]> • #915
Possible problem in crStateTransformDiff (state_transform.c)
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:27:22 -0600
[email protected] • #914
Re: Using Chromium to extract a scenegraph
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:44:02 -0400
Greg Humphreys <[email protected]> • #912
Re: Using Chromium to extract a scenegraph
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 18:19:04 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #911
Using Chromium to extract a scenegraph
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:15:23 -0400 (EDT)
"Daniel B. Faken" <[email protected]> • #910
Re: A Chromium network layer for Portals 3?
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:07:22 -0700
Michael Houston <[email protected]> • #909
A Chromium network layer for Portals 3?
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:49:02 -0400
Joel Welling <[email protected]> • #908
Re: experimental crSPUChangeFunction ("not used at this time")
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:27:09 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #907
Re: pack_program_swap.c not in cr1.8
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 12:10:09 -0400
<[email protected]> • #906
Re: pack_program_swap.c not in cr1.8
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:33:42 -0600
Brian Paul <[email protected]> • #905
pack_program_swap.c not in cr1.8
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 9:07:37 -0400
<[email protected]> • #904
experimental crSPUChangeFunction ("not used at this time")
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:54:14 -0400 (EDT)
"Daniel B. Faken" <[email protected]> • #903
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:28:50 -0700
Sean Ahern <[email protected]> • #902
Re: Texture crashes being caused by pack_texture.crev 1.35
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:03:47 -0400
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #901
Re: Texture crashes being caused by pack_texture.c rev 1.35
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:53:30 -0700
Michael Houston <[email protected]> • #900
RE: Texture crashes being caused by pack_texture.c rev 1.35
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:41:04 -0400
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #899
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.