gmane.comp.java.prevayler archive

770 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 8). Latest articles →

Re: mvn cannot find pom and jar inmaven central
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 14:47:01 +0200
David Niehaus <[email protected]> • #3714
mvn cannot find pom and jar inmaven central
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 19:16:52 +0200
David Niehaus <[email protected]> • #3713
Re: French article on Prevalence, Prevayler and Bamboo
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:30:58 +0200
Cédric Pineau <[email protected]> • #3712
Re: French article on Prevalence, Prevayler and Bamboo
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:25:53 +0200
Cédric Pineau <[email protected]> • #3711
Re: French article on Prevalence, Prevayler and Bamboo
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 06:00:34 -0300
Leonardo Lima de Vasconcellos <[email protected]> • #3710
Re: French article on Prevalence, Prevayler and Bamboo
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:57:50 +0100
Tasos <[email protected]> • #3709
French article on Prevalence, Prevayler and Bamboo
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:05:11 +0200
Cédric Pineau <[email protected]> • #3708
Re: MemSql - SQL Prevalence Layer :)
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:59:17 -0300
Leonardo Lima de Vasconcellos <[email protected]> • #3707
Re: MemSql - SQL Prevalence Layer :)
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:52:56 -0300
Diego Miranda <[email protected]> • #3706
MemSql - SQL Prevalence Layer :)
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:29:19 -0300
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3705
Re: NOOB Question - Get / lock / update (unserializable transaction)
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:06:24 -0400
Trever Shick <[email protected]> • #3704
Re: NOOB Question - Get / lock / update (unserializable transaction)
Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:07:01 -0300
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3703
NOOB Question - Get / lock / update (unserializable transaction)
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:24:06 -0400
Trever Shick <[email protected]> • #3702
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:06:45 -0300
Alexandre Nodari <[email protected]> • #3701
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:35:04 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3700
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:33:08 -0300
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3699
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:43:05 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3698
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:21:20 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3697
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:11:47 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3696
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:24:20 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3695
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:14:24 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3694
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:10:39 -0300
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3693
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:59:27 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3692
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:35:04 -0300
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3691
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:36:14 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3690
Fwd: Hi Karl, dont you want to add the maven info to the Prevayler home page?
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:15:50 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3689
Re: Some thoughts on serialization
Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:54:36 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3688
Some thoughts on serialization
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:09:54 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3687
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:04:14 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3686
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:17:59 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3685
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:17:46 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3684
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:48:14 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3683
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:28:17 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3682
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:46:54 +0100
Mikael Nordenberg <[email protected]> • #3681
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:09:07 -0200
Felipe Cruz <[email protected]> • #3680
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:17:50 -0200
Felipe Cruz <[email protected]> • #3679
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:41:11 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3678
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:27:46 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3677
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:18:41 -0200
Felipe Cruz <[email protected]> • #3676
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:34:23 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3675
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:46:06 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3674
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:34:40 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3673
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:08:17 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3672
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:48:43 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3671
Re: #liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:46:34 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3670
#liveDB server, research and upcoming webinar on In-Memory Database Systems
Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:31:27 +0000
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3669
Re: 0
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Alex Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #3668
(no subject)
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 07:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Alex Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #3667
Re: GZIP
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:14:14 -0800
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> • #3666
Re: GZIP
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:55:01 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3665
Re: GZIP
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:19:30 -0800
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> • #3664
Re: GZIP
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:52:53 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3663
GZIP
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:27:39 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3662
Re: Research?
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:22:54 -0800
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> • #3661
Research?
Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:30:24 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3660
Re: Maven Reference on the Home Page
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:28:05 -0300
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3659
Re: Maven Reference on the Home Page
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:25:02 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3658
Re: Presenting prevalence at devsum12
Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:24:09 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3657
Re: Presenting prevalence at devsum12
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:41:30 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3656
Re: Presenting prevalence at devsum12
Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:17:01 -0200
Felipe Cruz <[email protected]> • #3655
Re: Presenting prevalence at devsum12
Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:30:03 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3654
Presenting prevalence at devsum12
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:39:11 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3653
Maven Reference on the Home Page
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:01:00 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3652
Re: 20TB system prevalence in ibm's watson?
Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:36:24 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3651
Re: 20TB system prevalence in ibm's watson?
Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:34:00 +0000
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3650
Re: 20TB system prevalence in ibm's watson?
Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:32:49 -0800
William Pietri <[email protected]> • #3649
20TB system prevalence in ibm's watson?
Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:31:05 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3648
Re: Blogged: Relational and CRUD with #liveDB
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:13:40 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3647
Re: Blogged: Relational and CRUD with #liveDB
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:39:35 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3646
Re: #liveDB 0.3.2 released
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:29:33 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3645
Blogged: Relational and CRUD with #liveDB
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 05:06:24 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3644
Re: #liveDB 0.3.2 released
Thu, 24 Nov 2011 05:03:29 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3643
Re: #liveDB 0.3.2 released
Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:32:31 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3642
#liveDB 0.3.2 released
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:25:06 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3641
Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:51:43 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3640
Pull request
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:54:18 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3639
Large Scale Memory
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:50:40 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3638
Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 13:21:25 +0000
Edward Kimber <[email protected]> • #3637
Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:59:44 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3636
Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 03:13:49 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3635
Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:51:31 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3634
Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:32:23 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3633
Future Prevayler
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:10:06 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3632
Re: Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:09:54 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3631
Imagine if Prevayler could transparently use disk...
Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:15:12 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3630
Re: Failing tests in git
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 13:23:25 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3629
Failing tests in git
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:47:09 +0100
Karl Wettin <[email protected]> • #3628
Re: So why are things being executed twice on every transaction?
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:29:00 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3627
Re: So why are things being executed twice on every transaction?
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:38:11 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3626
Re: So why are things being executed twice on every transaction?
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 19:19:34 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3625
Re: So why are things being executed twice on every transaction?
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:46:03 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3624
Re: So why are things being executed twice on every transaction?
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:23:50 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3623
Re: So why are things being executed twice on every transaction?
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 01:17:20 -0800
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> • #3622
Re: So why are things being executed twice on every transaction?
Tue, 8 Nov 2011 14:15:53 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3621
Re: Making transaction calls act like a Java method call would
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:41:09 -0800
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> • #3620
Re: Making transaction calls act like a Java method call would
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:50:10 -0800
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> • #3619
Re: Making transaction calls act like a Java method call would
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:11:45 -0800
Robert Friberg <[email protected]> • #3618
Re: Making transaction calls act like a Java method call would
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 13:09:35 -0800
"Justin T. Sampson" <[email protected]> • #3617
Re: Making transaction calls act like a Java method call would
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 23:17:52 +0530
Naveen Chawla <[email protected]> • #3616
Re: Making transaction calls act like a Java method call would
Mon, 7 Nov 2011 15:09:52 -0200
Klaus Wuestefeld <[email protected]> • #3615
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.