gmane.comp.mobile.kannel.devel archive

29349 archived articles, newest first (page 93 of 294). Latest articles →

Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:25:55 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20172
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:02:17 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20171
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:25:27 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20170
Re: Patch - spellchecking
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:42:14 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20169
Re: [Re: Commercial Support]
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:54:28 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20168
Patch - spellchecking
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:52:01 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20167
Re: [Re: Commercial Support]
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:35:52 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20166
[Re: Commercial Support]
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:22:55 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20165
RE: RADIUS ACCT info used in WAP Push
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:55:51 +0200
"Lars Kristian Roland" <[email protected]> • #20164
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:18:23 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20163
Re: RADIUS ACCT info used in WAP Push
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:07:33 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20162
Re: RADIUS ACCT info used in WAP Push
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:05:26 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20161
RE: RADIUS ACCT info used in WAP Push
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:00:18 +0200
"Lars Kristian Roland" <[email protected]> • #20160
RE: RADIUS ACCT info used in WAP Push
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:56:42 +0100
"Paul Keogh" <[email protected]> • #20159
Re: RADIUS ACCT info used in WAP Push
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:38:41 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20158
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:31:45 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #20157
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:31:35 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20156
RADIUS ACCT info used in WAP Push
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:07:09 +0200
"Lars Kristian Roland" <[email protected]> • #20155
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:44:12 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20154
Re: Commercial Support
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:40:04 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20153
Commercial Support
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 04:17:29 -0400
Erwien Samantha Y <[email protected]> • #20152
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:47:54 +0200
Aarno Syvänen <[email protected]> • #20151
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:39:51 +0800
[email protected] • #20150
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, shouldbe 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:06:38 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20149
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, shouldbe 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:56:24 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20148
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, shouldbe 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:39:10 +0100
"Alex Kinch" <[email protected]> • #20147
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, shouldbe 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:37:25 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20146
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, shouldbe 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:34:20 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20145
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, shouldbe 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:30:11 +0100
"Alex Kinch" <[email protected]> • #20144
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:17:48 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20143
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:14:03 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20142
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:13:19 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20141
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:09:37 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20140
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:00:49 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20139
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:56:55 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20138
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:37:58 +1200
Alan McNatty <[email protected]> • #20137
Re: WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:24:23 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20136
WARNING: SMPP: PDU element <password> to long (length is 9, should be 9)
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:41:48 +1200
Alan McNatty <[email protected]> • #20135
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:17:59 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20134
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:28:29 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20133
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:01:30 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20132
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:17:32 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20131
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:26:34 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20130
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:50:48 +0800
Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. <[email protected]> • #20129
Re: Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:46:49 +0800
Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. <[email protected]> • #20128
Help: Kannel users from the Philippines
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:47:13 +0000
Josephine Forte <[email protected]> • #20127
MacOS X 10.3 build problems
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:42:14 -0400
flip phillips <[email protected]> • #20126
Re: MacOS X 10.3 build problems
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:04:16 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20125
Re: MacOS X 10.3 build problems
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:38:30 -0400
flip phillips <[email protected]> • #20124
Re: Using regex
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:42:41 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20123
RE: open source sms gateway written in java?
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:57:38 +0100
"Paul Keogh" <[email protected]> • #20122
open source sms gateway written in java?
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:16:29 +0530
Navjot Singh <[email protected]> • #20121
Re: MacOS X 10.3 build problems
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:21:32 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20120
Re: MacOS X 10.3 build problems
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 19:57:35 -0400
flip phillips <[email protected]> • #20119
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 08:37:10 +1200
Alan McNatty <[email protected]> • #20118
Re: MacOS X 10.3 build problems
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 21:52:32 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20117
Re: [ANN|RFC] Kannel 1.4.0-rc1
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 20:15:57 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20116
MacOS X 10.3 build problems
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 12:12:47 -0400
flip phillips <[email protected]> • #20115
Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: send-url for HTTP-based relay in 1.3.1
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 10:09:11 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Beckman <[email protected]> • #20114
Re: SMPP disconnect probs. (was:Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?)
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:14:20 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20113
Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: send-url for HTTP-based relay in 1.3.1
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 12:50:26 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20112
Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 02:26:14 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Beckman <[email protected]> • #20111
Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: send-url for HTTP-based relay in 1.3.1
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 00:53:32 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Beckman <[email protected]> • #20110
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sun, 08 Aug 2004 01:27:51 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20109
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:40:46 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20108
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:49:09 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20107
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:58:15 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20106
Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 20:53:57 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20105
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 16:06:19 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20104
Re: [ANN|RFC] Kannel 1.4.0-rc1
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 16:07:46 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20103
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 16:04:22 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20102
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 14:35:02 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20101
[ANN|RFC] Kannel 1.4.0-rc1
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 15:30:02 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20100
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Kannel 1.3.2 development release available
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 15:03:35 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20099
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 14:12:56 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20098
Re: [OT] WAP emulator for Linux
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:57:15 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20097
Re: send-url for HTTP-based relay in 1.3.1
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:55:04 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20096
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:48:19 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20095
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:44:09 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20094
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:42:22 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20093
Re: [PATCH] recode fix
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 13:29:10 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20092
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 03:27:24 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20091
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Sat, 07 Aug 2004 04:13:08 +0200
Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> • #20090
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 17:40:28 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20089
Re: Setting an alternative DCS for EMI2 SMSC
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:23:03 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20088
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 18:13:08 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20087
send-url for HTTP-based relay in 1.3.1
Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:09:27 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Beckman <[email protected]> • #20086
Setting an alternative DCS for EMI2 SMSC
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:23:36 +0200
Andreas Krennmair <[email protected]> • #20085
Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:10:35 +0530
Sahil Aggarwal <[email protected]> • #20084
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 10:08:20 +1200
Alan McNatty <[email protected]> • #20083
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 23:04:13 +0100
"Pedro B." <[email protected]> • #20082
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Fri, 06 Aug 2004 09:44:21 +1200
Alan McNatty <[email protected]> • #20081
Re: [Kannel-Users] Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
Peter Beckman <[email protected]> • #20080
[PATCH] recode fix
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 21:14:40 +0800
Rogelio M.Serrano Jr. <[email protected]> • #20079
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 15:09:26 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20078
Re: [PATCH] allow start/stop/restart for equals smsc-id's
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:56:21 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20077
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 14:48:11 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20076
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 13:46:35 +0200
Bruno Rodrigues <[email protected]> • #20075
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:49:59 +0100
José Borges Ferreira <[email protected]> • #20074
Re: Is 1.3.2 stable enough to call it 1.2.2 ?
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 12:15:09 +0200
Alexander Malysh <[email protected]> • #20073
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.