gmane.comp.openoffice.devel.porting archive

950 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 10). Latest articles →

Re: FYI: Desktop search of OOo Document content on Windows Vista
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 18:25:55 +0100
Stephan Schaefer <[email protected]> • #14642
FYI: Desktop search of OOo Document content on Windows Vista
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:45:42 +0100
Lars Langhans <[email protected]> • #14641
Re: OS/2 port child work space os2port01
Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:59:22 +0100 (CET)
"Yuri Dario" <[email protected]> • #14640
Re: OS/2 port child work space os2port01
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:52:50 +0100 (CET)
"Yuri Dario" <[email protected]> • #14639
Re: OS/2 port child work space os2port01
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:30:19 +0100
Martin Hollmichel <[email protected]> • #14638
OS/2 port child work space os2port01
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:38:14 +0100
Martin Hollmichel <[email protected]> • #14637
Re: Re: [udk-cvs] CVS update: /udk/ure/source/uretest/
Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:57:22 +0100
Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> • #14636
Re: Re: [udk-cvs] CVS update: /udk/ure/source/uretest/
Tue, 5 Dec 2006 13:56:35 +0100
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #14635
Re: Registration wizard popup at every start
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:50:35 +0200
Joerg Barfurth <[email protected]> • #14592
Re: Registration wizard popup at every start
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 12:00:51 +0200 (CDT)
"Yuri Dario" <[email protected]> • #14591
Re: Registration wizard popup at every start
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:34:51 +0200 (CDT)
"Yuri Dario" <[email protected]> • #14590
Re: Registration wizard popup at every start
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:20:19 +0200
Joerg Barfurth <[email protected]> • #14589
OS/2 window size and positioning coordinates
Tue, 30 May 2006 23:51:23 +0200 (CDT)
"Yuri Dario" <[email protected]> • #14585
Registration wizard popup at every start
Tue, 30 May 2006 16:36:38 +0200 (CDT)
"Yuri Dario" <[email protected]> • #14584
Re: linux/sparc and cross_compile
Mon, 29 May 2006 18:08:32 +1000
jim <[email protected]> • #14583
Re: Re: [Mac OS X ] japanese tester needed
Sun, 28 May 2006 12:56:29 +0900 (JST)
NAKATA Maho <[email protected]> • #14582
Re: Registry test failing
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:05:09 +0200
Jürgen Schmidt <[email protected]> • #14535
Re: Change boost version for 1.33
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 04:29:04 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #14494
Re: Change boost version for 1.33
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:48:07 +0100
Thorsten Behrens <[email protected]> • #14493
Change boost version for 1.33
Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:09:04 +0100
eric b <[email protected]> • #14492
Re: Any.hxx and gcc-4.1
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:40:52 +0100
Petr Mladek <[email protected]> • #14322
Re: Any.hxx and gcc-4.1
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:39:42 +0100
Petr Mladek <[email protected]> • #14321
Re: Digital certificates and OOo2 on OSX
Thu, 03 Nov 2005 19:52:59 -0500
"G. Roderick Singleton" <[email protected]> • #14233
Re: Digital certificates and OOo2 on OSX
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:30:06 +0200
Shoshannah Forbes <[email protected]> • #14232
Re: MacOSX 2.0.0 builds
Fri, 04 Nov 2005 07:04:22 +0900 (JST)
NAKATA Maho <[email protected]> • #14231
Re: MacOSX 2.0.0 builds
Fri, 04 Nov 2005 07:03:21 +0900 (JST)
NAKATA Maho <[email protected]> • #14230
Re: [Mac OS X] 1.9.xxx status
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:24:49 +0300
Mox <[email protected]> • #13968
.NET 2005 Beta 2 compiler evaluation
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:25:59 +0200
Oliver Bolte <[email protected]> • #13967
Re: Need a decision re. 10.4: which Xcode version?
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:37:35 +1000
Colin Charles <[email protected]> • #13966
Re: [Mac OS X] 1.9.xxx status
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:34:13 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
James Mckenzie <[email protected]> • #13965
[Mac OS X] 1.9.xxx status
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:25:21 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13964
Re: No dlcompat in OOo 1.1.5?
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:43:16 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
James Mckenzie <[email protected]> • #13963
Re: No dlcompat in OOo 1.1.5?
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:50:13 +0200
Eric Hoch <[email protected]> • #13962
Re: Failed build of 680 m128 on Tiger
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:51:50 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13961
Re: osacompile needs a quartz display
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:38:51 +0200
Stephan Schaefer <[email protected]> • #13960
Re: Failed build of 680 m128 on Tiger
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:47:39 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13959
Failed build of 680 m128 on Tiger
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:47:37 -0400
Adric Net <[email protected]> • #13958
Re: osacompile needs a quartz display
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 09:32:21 +0200
Rene Engelhard <[email protected]> • #13957
Re: osacompile needs a quartz display
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:52:45 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13956
No dlcompat in OOo 1.1.5?
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 21:33:54 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13955
Re: osacompile needs a quartz display
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:47:37 +0200
Stephan Schaefer <[email protected]> • #13954
Re: osacompile needs a quartz display
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:27:56 +0200
[email protected] (Pavel Janík) • #13953
Re: Experiences with Mac OS X installer, packing process, OOo start script (#42998#)
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:50:17 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13952
Re: Experiences with Mac OS X installer, packing process, OOo start script (#42998#)
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:20:29 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13951
Experiences with Mac OS X installer, packing process, OOo start script (#42998#)
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:17:34 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13950
Re: #i42998# is far from being QAed (Re: [porting-dev] [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation)
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:00:50 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13949
Re: #i42998# is far from being QAed (Re: [porting-dev] [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation)
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:00:57 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13948
Re: osacompile needs a quartz display
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:28:56 +0200
Stephan Schaefer <[email protected]> • #13947
#i42998# is far from being QAed (Re: [porting-dev] [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation)
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:37:49 +0900 (JST)
NAKATA Maho <[email protected]> • #13946
Re: [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 08:19:56 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13945
osacompile needs a quartz display
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:56:02 +0900
ASARI Takashi <[email protected]> • #13944
Re: [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:45:44 +0200
[email protected] (Pavel Janík) • #13943
Re: [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:53:05 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13942
Re: XDarwin support still required on MacOSX ?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:19:33 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
James Mckenzie <[email protected]> • #13941
Re: [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:52:57 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13940
Re: [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:49:54 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13939
Re: XDarwin support still required on MacOSX ?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:04:33 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13938
Re: [urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:42:01 +0200
[email protected] (Pavel Janík) • #13937
Re: XDarwin support still required on MacOSX ?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:42:52 +0200
Stephan Schaefer <[email protected]> • #13936
Re: XDarwin support still required on MacOSX ?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:33:04 +0200
"Clément Varaldi (ML)" <[email protected]> • #13935
Re: XDarwin support still required on MacOSX ?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:56:45 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13934
[urgent] [Mac OS X ] 1.9.xxx and localization strings for installation
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:49:42 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13933
XDarwin support still required on MacOSX ?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:13:12 +0200
Stephan Schaefer <[email protected]> • #13932
EPM on OSX 10.4 and gcc 4
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:04:41 +0100
Simon Hogg <[email protected]> • #13931
Re: Need a decision re. 10.4: which Xcode version?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:00:21 +0200
Joerg Sievers <[email protected]> • #13930
Re: [Mac OS X ] Donation from CUSOON
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:08:24 +0200
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer <[email protected]> • #13929
Re: Need a decision re. 10.4: which Xcode version?
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:08:41 +0900 (JST)
NAKATA Maho <[email protected]> • #13928
Re: Need a decision re. 10.4: which Xcode version?
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:34:41 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
James Mckenzie <[email protected]> • #13927
Re: Need a decision re. 10.4: which Xcode version?
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:07:25 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13926
Need a decision re. 10.4: which Xcode version?
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 22:16:22 +0200
Florian Heckl <[email protected]> • #13925
Re: [Mac OS X ] Donation from CUSOON
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 06:28:21 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13924
[Mac OS X ] Donation from CUSOON
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:23:21 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13923
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:14:27 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13922
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:53:46 +0200
Christian Junker <[email protected]> • #13921
Re: Terry is gone ...
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 07:44:05 +0200
Molcan Filip <[email protected]> • #13920
Re: Terry is gone ...
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:59:48 +0900 (JST)
NAKATA Maho <[email protected]> • #13919
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:54:54 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13918
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 23:37:11 +0200
Johan Henselmans <[email protected]> • #13917
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:05:30 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13916
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:56:09 +0200
Christian Junker <[email protected]> • #13915
Re: Terry is gone ...
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 23:14:52 +0100 (BST)
Sander Vesik <[email protected]> • #13914
Successful build of 1.1.5 on Tiger
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:46:35 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13913
Re: Terry is gone ...
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:38:52 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13912
Passing of Terry Teague
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:36:04 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13911
Terry is gone ...
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:07:28 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13910
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 14:50:49 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13909
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:08:03 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13908
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 21:00:17 +0200
Tino Rachui <[email protected]> • #13907
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 20:21:20 -0700
James McKenzie <[email protected]> • #13906
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:13:01 +0200
[email protected] (Pavel Janík) • #13905
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:37:45 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
James Mckenzie <[email protected]> • #13904
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:34:22 +0200
Eric Hoch <[email protected]> • #13903
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:15:08 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13902
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:06:42 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13901
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:54:46 +0200
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer <[email protected]> • #13900
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:25:18 +0200
Johan Henselmans <[email protected]> • #13899
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:51:34 +0200
Eric Hoch <[email protected]> • #13898
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:32:08 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13897
Re: What is (or should be) the Mac OS X baseline for OOo 2.0?
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:13:05 +0200
"eric.bachard" <[email protected]> • #13896
Re: [Mac OS X / X11 ] Proposition of baseline for 2.0 and 2.0.1
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:05:00 +0200
Eric Hoch <[email protected]> • #13895
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.