gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote archive

1077 archived articles, newest first (page 11 of 11). Latest articles →

Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Fri, 9 May 2025 16:23:37 +0200
Wouter Verhelst <[email protected]> • #23796
Re: tag2upload - request for DPL action
Fri, 9 May 2025 15:39:19 +0200
Daniel Gröber <[email protected]> • #23795
Re: tag2upload - request for DPL action
Fri, 9 May 2025 13:52:04 +0200
Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]> • #23794
Re: tag2upload - request for DPL action
Fri, 09 May 2025 12:54:32 +0100
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> • #23793
Re: Archive section for open source models
Fri, 9 May 2025 06:15:44 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #23792
Re: tag2upload - request for DPL action
Fri, 09 May 2025 12:02:15 +0100
Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> • #23791
Re: Archive section for open source models
Fri, 9 May 2025 12:57:41 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23790
Re: withdrawing Proposal A -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Fri, 9 May 2025 12:50:14 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23789
tag2upload - request for DPL action
Fri, 9 May 2025 11:43:22 +0100
Ian Jackson <[email protected]> • #23788
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Fri, 9 May 2025 12:11:25 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23787
100% reproducible (was Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models)
Fri, 9 May 2025 09:55:51 +0000
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> • #23786
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Fri, 9 May 2025 04:48:37 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #23785
Software copyright (was: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models)
Fri, 9 May 2025 04:40:42 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #23784
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Fri, 9 May 2025 11:30:50 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23783
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Fri, 9 May 2025 11:11:08 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23782
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Fri, 9 May 2025 09:39:44 +0200
Matthias Urlichs <[email protected]> • #23781
Re: [RFCv2] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Fri, 09 May 2025 09:54:03 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23780
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 8 May 2025 23:06:12 -0500
Richard Laager <[email protected]> • #23779
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 8 May 2025 19:24:55 -0600
Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> • #23778
[RFCv2] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 8 May 2025 21:16:09 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #23777
Re: withdrawing Proposal A -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 8 May 2025 15:58:17 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #23776
Re: withdrawing Proposal A -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 8 May 2025 16:22:41 -0400
Mo Zhou <[email protected]> • #23775
Withdrawing my option.
Thu, 08 May 2025 14:10:43 -0600
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #23774
Re: Archive section for open source models
Thu, 08 May 2025 13:38:15 -0600
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #23773
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Thu, 08 May 2025 11:48:59 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #23772
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Thu, 8 May 2025 17:54:58 +0000
Clint Adams <[email protected]> • #23771
Re: withdrawing Proposal A -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 08 May 2025 13:48:01 -0400
"M. Zhou" <[email protected]> • #23770
Re: withdrawing Proposal A -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 08 May 2025 10:33:55 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #23769
withdrawing Proposal A -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 08 May 2025 13:05:08 -0400
"M. Zhou" <[email protected]> • #23768
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Thu, 08 May 2025 09:42:25 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #23767
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Thu, 08 May 2025 09:59:14 -0600
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #23766
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Thu, 08 May 2025 09:52:25 -0600
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #23765
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Thu, 8 May 2025 17:40:34 +0300
Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> • #23764
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Thu, 8 May 2025 17:38:52 +0300
Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> • #23763
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 8 May 2025 12:43:50 +0200
Wouter Verhelst <[email protected]> • #23762
Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 08 May 2025 10:35:01 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23761
Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 08 May 2025 10:27:11 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23760
Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 8 May 2025 04:44:21 +0200 (CEST)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #23759
Re: Proposal A Amendament (was: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Wed, 7 May 2025 22:08:08 -0400
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <[email protected]> • #23758
Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Wed, 07 May 2025 19:39:36 -0600
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #23757
Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Thu, 08 May 2025 03:22:26 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23756
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 07 May 2025 15:57:42 -0700
Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> • #23755
Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Wed, 7 May 2025 22:48:50 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #23754
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 18:11:27 +0000
Clint Adams <[email protected]> • #23753
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 07 May 2025 19:36:13 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23752
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 17:23:21 +0000
Clint Adams <[email protected]> • #23751
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 11:16:59 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #23750
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 07 May 2025 18:10:37 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23749
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Wed, 7 May 2025 15:20:29 +0000
Clint Adams <[email protected]> • #23748
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 17:13:06 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23747
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Wed, 7 May 2025 16:39:27 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23746
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Wed, 07 May 2025 08:20:40 -0600
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #23745
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 15:13:28 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #23744
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 14:05:05 +0000
Clint Adams <[email protected]> • #23743
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Wed, 07 May 2025 07:53:23 -0600
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #23742
Re: [RFC] Counter-Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Wed, 07 May 2025 14:32:37 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23741
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 07 May 2025 14:20:44 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23740
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Wed, 07 May 2025 14:05:23 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23739
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 12:09:50 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23738
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 07 May 2025 11:34:27 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23737
Re: Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Wed, 7 May 2025 11:27:56 +0200
Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> • #23736
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 11:25:53 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23735
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 11:17:00 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23734
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 06 May 2025 17:56:11 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #23733
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Wed, 7 May 2025 00:01:20 +0000
Clint Adams <[email protected]> • #23732
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 6 May 2025 22:10:28 -0000 (UTC)
Marco d'Itri <[email protected]> • #23731
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 06 May 2025 14:07:29 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #23730
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 06 May 2025 22:44:57 +0200
Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> • #23729
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Tue, 6 May 2025 20:09:54 +0000
Bill Allombert <[email protected]> • #23728
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Tue, 6 May 2025 21:45:22 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23727
Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Tue, 6 May 2025 21:14:11 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23726
Draft: Proposal Alternative: Traning data is not source code
Tue, 6 May 2025 20:55:45 +0200
Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> • #23725
Re: Proposal Alternative: A Model Can Be a Preferred form of Modification
Tue, 6 May 2025 10:51:32 -0700
Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> • #23724
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 6 May 2025 12:29:28 -0500
"G. Branden Robinson" <[email protected]> • #23723
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 6 May 2025 18:08:48 +0100
Simon McVittie <[email protected]> • #23722
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 06 May 2025 08:48:13 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #23721
Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data
Tue, 06 May 2025 08:36:50 -0700
Russ Allbery <[email protected]> • #23720
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.