gmane.linux.redhat.ia64.general archive

389 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: RH7.2 on IA64; what is the status of: ieeefp include file + some functions ?
22 Oct 2002 14:51:36 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #118
RH7.2 on IA64; what is the status of: ieeefp include file + some functions ?
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:05:35 +0200
Jacky Malcles <[email protected]> • #117
Software RAID function of RH7.2 is not yet reliable.
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:27:51 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #116
RE: Kernel Shared Memory Max (shmmax)
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:24:55 -0700
"Seth, Rohit" <[email protected]> • #115
Re: RH7.2 IA64 and the e1000 NIC.
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 11:31:35 -0400
Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> • #114
RH7.2 IA64 and the e1000 NIC.
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:15:10 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #113
When will we have the larger swap partition than 2GB? (use parted!)
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 17:41:00 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #112
Re: Kernel Shared Memory Max (shmmax)
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 10:06:33 +0900
[email protected] • #111
Re: [Linux-ia64] Kernel Shared Memory Max (shmmax)
Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:32:10 -0500
Donny Cooper <[email protected]> • #110
RE: Reading sys_call_table entries
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:11:32 -0700
"Luck, Tony" <[email protected]> • #109
Reading sys_call_table entries
Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
Amit Purohit <[email protected]> • #108
Re: writing system call issues
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 00:07:31 -0400
Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> • #107
writing system call issues
Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:49:50 -0400 (EDT)
Amit Purohit <[email protected]> • #106
The priority of swap areas and the description in /etc/fstab..
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 01:14:24 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #105
When will we have the larger swap partition than 2GB?
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 00:35:39 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #104
RedHat7.2 IA-64 install experience; abiword is missing prevents install
Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:31:58 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #103
When will we have the large partition than just 2GB for the swap?
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 23:08:56 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #102
Re: Intel PRO/100 NIC trouble when memory is more than 2GB with RedHat7.1beta
25 Sep 2002 10:38:48 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #101
Intel PRO/100 NIC trouble when memory is more than 2GB with RedHat7.1beta
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 12:56:04 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #100
Re: Intel PRO/100 NIC trouble when memory is more than 2GB with RedHat7.1beta
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:36:03 -0700
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #99
Intel PRO/100 NIC trouble when memory is more than 2GB with RedHat7.1beta
Tue, 24 Sep 2002 08:56:54 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Intel PRO/100 NIC trouble when memory is more than 2GB with RedHat7.1beta
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:19:32 -0400
Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> • #97
RE: Intel PRO/100 NIC trouble when memory is more than 2GB with R edHat7.1beta
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:28:31 -0500
[email protected] • #96
Re: When you failed to boot with your 2GB+ memory system from ASC 29160
Sun, 22 Sep 2002 22:54:11 -0400 (EDT)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #95
Intel PRO/100 NIC trouble when memory is more than 2GB with RedHat7.1beta
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:41:05 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #94
When you failed to boot with your 2GB+ memory system from ASC 29160
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 11:27:22 +0900 (JST)
"Murakami Hiroshi" <[email protected]> • #93
Re: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:27:38 -0500
Neil Gorsuch <[email protected]> • #92
Maximum File Size Limit and Process Space
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 02:28:05 +0530
"deepak" <[email protected]> • #91
Re: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 13:25:17 -0500
Michael Mackey <[email protected]> • #90
Re: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:29:34 -0500
Neil Gorsuch <[email protected]> • #89
RE: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:39:07 -0700
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #88
RE: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:14:27 -0500
[email protected] • #87
Re: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
12 Sep 2002 17:37:21 -0500
"Michael A. Mackey" <[email protected]> • #86
RE: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
12 Sep 2002 17:34:16 -0500
"Michael A. Mackey" <[email protected]> • #85
RE: Redhat on HP i2000 ?
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 12:54:59 -0700
"Prince, Timothy C" <[email protected]> • #84
Redhat on HP i2000 ?
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:28:31 -0500
Neil Gorsuch <[email protected]> • #83
Re: PostgreSQL on RedHat Advanced Server with Itanium II on HP rx5670
12 Sep 2002 15:12:17 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #82
PostgreSQL on RedHat Advanced Server with Itanium II on HP rx5670
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 01:34:19 -0500 (CDT)
Luis Rodriguez (ISS) <[email protected]> • #81
Re: e2fsck running under EFI?
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:43:21 -0700
Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> • #80
e2fsck running under EFI?
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 13:07:10 -0700
"FERGUSON,MARTIN (Non-HP-Roseville,ex1)" <[email protected]> • #79
Oracle9i Linux/IA64, Release 1 - Developer's Release , Redhat and Itanium
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:20:41 +0530
"naveen jangira" <[email protected]> • #78
Re: Perfmon on Itanium
22 Aug 2002 11:51:37 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #77
Re: Perfmon on Itanium
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:09:41 -0400
"Charles R. Hardnett" <[email protected]> • #76
Re: Unresolved symbol __multi3
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:07:58 -0700
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #75
Re: Unresolved symbol __multi3
14 Aug 2002 13:58:35 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #74
Re: Unresolved symbol __multi3
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:17 -0400
Joubert Berger <[email protected]> • #73
Re: Unresolved symbol __multi3
14 Aug 2002 12:09:57 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #72
Nasser Momtaheni/San Jose/IBM is out of the office.
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 01:01:29 -0500
Nasser Momtaheni <[email protected]> • #71
RE: Unresolved symbol __multi3
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:15:54 -0700
"Prince, Timothy C" <[email protected]> • #70
Unresolved symbol __multi3
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:12:43 -0400
Joubert Berger <[email protected]> • #69
Re: Perfmon on Itanium
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:22:49 -0700
Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> • #68
Perfmon on Itanium
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 16:51:43 -0400
"Mongkol Ekpanyapong" <[email protected]> • #67
RE: [ia64qa:00096] RedHat 7.2 on Itanium-2
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 16:56:59 -0500
"Delaney, Pam" <[email protected]> • #66
Re: Upgrade kernel
30 Jul 2002 16:47:59 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #65
Upgrade kernel
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 04:07:49 -0400
"Mongkol Ekpanyapong" <[email protected]> • #64
Re: [ia64qa:00096] RedHat 7.2 on Itanium-2
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:27:25 +0200
Holger Berger <[email protected]> • #63
Re: upgrade kernel
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 18:48:20 -0400
"Charles R. Hardnett" <[email protected]> • #62
Re: upgrade kernel
25 Jun 2002 17:27:21 -0400
Jim Wilson <[email protected]> • #61
RE: BIOS update.
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:39:10 -0700
"Prince, Timothy C" <[email protected]> • #60
upgrade kernel
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:49:23 -0400
"Mongkol Ekpanyapong" <[email protected]> • #59
BIOS update.
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:25:58 -0400 (EDT)
Amit Purohit <[email protected]> • #58
preparing Ia64 install images on i386 RedHat Machine.
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 15:40:18 +0200
alex dukhan <[email protected]> • #57
problem booting from CD after burning.
Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:48:45 +0200
alex dukhan <[email protected]> • #56
RE: Redhat 7.2ia64 CD layout
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 20:54:15 -0400 (EDT)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #55
RE: Redhat 7.2ia64 CD layout
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 08:43:09 -0500
[email protected] • #54
RE: Redhat 7.2ia64 CD layout
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 14:45:15 +0200
alex dukhan <[email protected]> • #53
Re: Redhat 7.2ia64 CD layout
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 07:17:03 -0400 (EDT)
"Mike A. Harris" <[email protected]> • #52
distros CD's layout.
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 13:25:29 +0200
alex dukhan <[email protected]> • #51
Redhat 7.2ia64 CD layout
Sun, 16 Jun 2002 10:57:08 +0200
alex dukhan <[email protected]> • #50
RE: kernel 2.4.9-34 ia64 bugfix list?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:30:13 +0100
Daniel Kidger <[email protected]> • #49
RE: kernel 2.4.9-34 ia64 bugfix list?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:12:16 -0700
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #48
RE: kernel 2.4.9-34 ia64 bugfix list?
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:49:35 +0100
Daniel Kidger <[email protected]> • #47
Re: kernel 2.4.9-34 ia64 bugfix list?
12 Jun 2002 20:14:22 +0100
David Addison <[email protected]> • #46
RE: kernel 2.4.9-34 ia64 bugfix list?
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 14:40:18 -0400
"FISHER,JOE (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <[email protected]> • #45
kernel 2.4.9-34 ia64 bugfix list?
12 Jun 2002 14:14:15 -0400
Rob Myers <[email protected]> • #44
Re:Re: Crash when executing "cat /dev/mem"
Thu, 30 May 2002 13:05:25 +0200
"José A.Rodríguez" <[email protected]> • #43
IA-64 Linux support for QLA2200 Fiber-Channel SAN
Fri, 24 May 2002 13:09:00 -0500
mackey <[email protected]> • #42
Re: Support for QLogic FC HBA
Fri, 24 May 2002 17:04:17 -0500
"Fernando Ortiz" <[email protected]> • #41
Re: Support for QLogic FC HBA
Fri, 24 May 2002 15:30:08 -0500
Michael Mackey <[email protected]> • #40
Re: Support for QLogic FC HBA
Fri, 24 May 2002 16:20:04 -0500
"Fernando Ortiz" <[email protected]> • #39
Re: Support for QLogic FC HBA
Fri, 24 May 2002 14:04:27 -0500
mackey <[email protected]> • #38
RE: Support for QLogic FC HBA
Fri, 24 May 2002 13:39:07 -0500
[email protected] • #37
Support for QLogic FC HBA
Fri, 24 May 2002 13:16:54 -0500
mackey <[email protected]> • #36
Re: Crash when executing "cat /dev/mem"
Mon, 20 May 2002 11:01:48 -0700
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #35
Re: Crash when executing "cat /dev/mem"
Thu, 16 May 2002 09:18:58 -0700
Stephane Eranian <[email protected]> • #34
Crash when executing "cat /dev/mem"
Wed, 15 May 2002 15:32:06 +0200
"Jose A. Rodriguez" <[email protected]> • #33
Re: Can't boot 7.2 ia64 after installation
Thu, 02 May 2002 14:01:00 -0400
Eric Kropf <[email protected]> • #32
Can't boot 7.2 ia64 after installation
Thu, 2 May 2002 12:49:55 -0500
"Cannon, Mike R." <[email protected]> • #31
Re: mprotect problem
Wed, 1 May 2002 17:10:53 -0700
David Mosberger <[email protected]> • #30
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.