gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination archive

269 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 3). Latest articles →

Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:54:19 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #186
Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:44:22 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #185
Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 11:14:16 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #184
Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:34:29 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #183
Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:29:20 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #182
Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:07:15 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #181
Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 02:29:01 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #180
Re: Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:11:16 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #179
Noarch Naming Scheme
Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:00:58 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #178
Re: Opening the Group-tag debate
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:09:26 +0300
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #177
Re: Opening the Group-tag debate
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:12:11 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #176
Re: Re: APT and Versioned Obsoletes
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:06:14 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #175
Re: Opening the Group-tag debate
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:54:46 +0200
Dries Verachtert <[email protected]> • #174
Opening the Group-tag debate
Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:34:46 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #173
Re: APT and Versioned Obsoletes
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:58:58 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #172
Re: [apt-rpm] Re: APT and Versioned Obsoletes
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:22:01 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #171
Re: [apt-rpm] Re: APT and Versioned Obsoletes
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:54:12 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #170
Re: Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:06:26 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #169
Re: Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 17:01:05 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #168
Re: Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:06:00 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #167
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:22:50 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #166
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:31:22 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #165
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:06:18 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #164
Re: Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:18:52 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #163
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 22:14:43 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:11:08 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #161
Re: Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 03:10:31 +0200
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #160
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:19:00 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #159
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 00:13:14 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #158
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
13 Aug 2004 12:11:24 -0700
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #157
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
13 Aug 2004 11:57:08 -0700
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #156
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:28:54 +0200 (CEST)
Bert de Bruijn <[email protected]> • #155
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:30:08 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #154
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:03:53 -0500
Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #153
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:55:07 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #152
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #151
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:59:14 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #150
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:33:20 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #149
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:00:55 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #148
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:58:27 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #147
Re: Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 07:49:12 -0500
Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #146
Repo information inside rpm?
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:43:15 +0200 (CEST)
Morten Kjeldgaard <[email protected]> • #145
Re: Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts For Replacing Other Packages
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:05:15 -0500 (CDT)
Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #144
Re: Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts For Replacing Other Packages
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:55:51 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #143
Re: Re: Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts For Replacing Other Packages
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:25:16 -0500
Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #142
Re: Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts For Replacing Other Packages
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:43:48 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #141
Obsoletes/Provides/Conflicts For Replacing Other Packages
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:27:59 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #140
Versioning schemes/disttags and Mandrake style shared libs packaging (was: YANST)
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:37:59 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #139
YANST [was: Re: GD >= 2.0 for pre FC2 ?]
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:26:38 +0200
Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #138
Re: GD >= 2.0 for pre FC2 ?
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:28:24 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #137
Re: GD >= 2.0 for pre FC2 ?
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 07:43:21 +0200
Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #136
repo-janitor configurations
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 10:14:59 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #135
Re: rpm scripts for daemons, advice please
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:30:04 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #134
Re: Re: rpm scripts for daemons, advice please
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:15:39 -0700
Florin Andrei <[email protected]> • #133
Re: rpm scripts for daemons, advice please
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:05:58 -0700
Florin Andrei <[email protected]> • #132
Re: rpm scripts for daemons, advice please
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 10:54:38 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #131
rpm scripts for daemons, advice please
Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:53:04 +0200
Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #130
Please register FC2 repositories at fedoratracker.org
Thu, 20 May 2004 01:58:29 -0400
Brad Smith <[email protected]> • #129
Re: overriding kernel modules on 2.6.x
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 12:02:43 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #128
Re: overriding kernel modules on 2.6.x
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:02:27 +0200
Matthias Saou <[email protected]> • #127
building kernels under mach (FC2)?
16 Jun 2004 13:10:11 -0700
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #126
Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:23:55 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #125
overriding kernel modules on 2.6.x
14 Jun 2004 11:28:04 -0700
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #124
Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:25:31 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #123
Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:00:08 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #122
Re: [HEADS-UP] Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 19:54:58 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #121
Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 12:31:19 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #120
Re: [HEADS-UP] Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:02:18 +0200
Thomas Vander Stichele <[email protected]> • #119
Re: MySQL 4?
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 17:09:23 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #118
MySQL 4?
Tue, 01 Jun 2004 10:00:48 +0200
Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #117
Re: Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Fri, 28 May 2004 01:07:19 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #116
Re: Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Thu, 27 May 2004 20:37:23 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #115
Re: Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Thu, 27 May 2004 20:00:56 +0200 (CEST)
"Bent Terp" <[email protected]> • #114
Re: Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Thu, 27 May 2004 19:36:06 +0200
Rudolf Kastl <[email protected]> • #113
Re: Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Thu, 27 May 2004 19:16:48 +0200
Rudolf Kastl <[email protected]> • #112
Re: Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Thu, 27 May 2004 09:07:22 +0200
Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #111
Re: Packaging Dilemma
Tue, 25 May 2004 13:51:46 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #110
[HEADS-UP] Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Tue, 25 May 2004 13:39:04 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #109
Re: mozilla epoch madness
Tue, 25 May 2004 13:28:04 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #108
Re: Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Mon, 24 May 2004 14:15:36 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #107
Packaging Process - PLEASE READ
Fri, 21 May 2004 04:47:39 +0200
Rudolf Kastl <[email protected]> • #106
Re: Re: Packaging Dilemma
Thu, 20 May 2004 22:59:25 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #105
Re: Packaging Dilemma
Wed, 19 May 2004 08:10:10 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #104
Re: Packaging Dilemma
Tue, 18 May 2004 18:41:19 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #103
Re: Packaging Dilemma
Wed, 19 May 2004 00:26:33 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #102
Packaging Dilemma
Mon, 17 May 2004 23:31:29 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #101
Re: ATrpms multi-developer
Mon, 17 May 2004 22:32:01 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #100
Re: ATrpms multi-developer
Mon, 17 May 2004 16:18:31 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #99
ATrpms multi-developer
Mon, 17 May 2004 21:01:49 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)
Fri, 14 May 2004 12:05:14 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #97
Re: Proposal for python packages
Thu, 13 May 2004 14:32:05 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #96
bugzilla.atrpms.net knows about fc2 now
Wed, 12 May 2004 12:22:03 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #95
Re: Re: PyVault Nomenclature
Mon, 10 May 2004 13:04:47 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #94
Re: PyVault Nomenclature
Mon, 10 May 2004 09:26:39 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #93
Re: PyVault Nomenclature
Mon, 10 May 2004 08:18:01 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #92
Re: PyVault Nomenclature
Sun, 9 May 2004 19:03:31 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #91
PyVault Nomenclature
Mon, 10 May 2004 00:20:02 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #90
PyPackage.org
Sun, 9 May 2004 21:40:00 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #89
Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)
Thu, 6 May 2004 23:21:21 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #88
Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)
06 May 2004 13:06:09 -0700
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #87
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.