gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination archive

Re: I want Matthias for president! (was: Scratching the itch)

Thu, 06 May 2004 12:03:31 -0500

Law Horne <[email protected]> • #86

Re: Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)

Thu, 6 May 2004 17:41:44 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #85

Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)

Thu, 06 May 2004 10:08:11 -0500

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #84

Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)

Thu, 6 May 2004 16:48:37 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #83

Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)

Thu, 6 May 2004 16:34:40 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #82

Re: kernel module versioning

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:57:50 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #81

Re: kernel module versioning

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:21:56 +0200

Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #80

Re: Blackmailing ...

Thu, 06 May 2004 23:57:51 +1200

Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> • #79

Re: kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)

Thu, 6 May 2004 14:48:35 +0300 (EEST)

Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #78

Re: Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Thu, 06 May 2004 13:45:52 +0200

Thomas Vander Stichele <[email protected]> • #77

kernel module versioning (was: Blackmailing ...)

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:40:41 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #76

Re: Re: Blackmailing ...

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:25:23 +0200

[email protected] • #75

Re: Blackmailing ...

Thu, 6 May 2004 13:15:35 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #74

Re: Blackmailing ...

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:48:50 +0200 (CEST)

Bert de Bruijn <[email protected]> • #73

Re: Blackmailing ...

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:33:54 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #72

Re: Blackmailing ... (was: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???)

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:25:03 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #71

Re: [repo-coord] Re: Blackmailing ...

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:25:27 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #70

Re: Blackmailing ...

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:14:06 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #69

Re: [repo-coord] Re: Blackmailing ... (was: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???)

Thu, 6 May 2004 12:05:57 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #68

Re: [repo-coord] Re: Blackmailing ... (was: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???)

Thu, 6 May 2004 17:44:31 +0800

Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #67

Re: Re: Blackmailing ... (was: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???)

Thu, 6 May 2004 11:43:23 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #66

Re: Blackmailing ... (was: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???)

Thu, 6 May 2004 11:21:21 +0200 (CEST)

Bert de Bruijn <[email protected]> • #65

Blackmailing ... (was: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???)

Thu, 6 May 2004 10:39:00 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #64

Re: I want Matthias for president! (was: Scratching the itch)

Wed, 5 May 2004 13:17:39 +0300 (EEST)

Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #63

I want Matthias for president! (was: Scratching the itch)

Wed, 5 May 2004 11:41:24 +0200

Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #62

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 10:49:33 +0200

Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #61

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 09:52:41 +0300 (EEST)

Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #60

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 09:43:44 +0300 (EEST)

Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #59

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 04:39:10 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #58

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Tue, 04 May 2004 21:30:53 -0500

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #57

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 03:48:36 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #56

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 03:00:49 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #55

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 02:58:49 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #54

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

04 May 2004 17:47:51 -0700

Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #53

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Tue, 04 May 2004 19:38:30 -0500

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #52

Re: Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

04 May 2004 17:21:27 -0700

Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #51

Re: Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 05 May 2004 03:07:08 +0300

Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #50

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 01:52:47 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #49

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 01:42:17 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #48

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Tue, 04 May 2004 18:35:00 -0500

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #47

Re: Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

04 May 2004 16:19:24 -0700

Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[email protected]> • #46

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 00:58:31 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #45

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Wed, 5 May 2004 00:49:19 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #44

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Tue, 04 May 2004 17:13:53 -0500

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #43

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies???

Tue, 4 May 2004 23:03:25 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #42

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 04 May 2004 10:29:41 -0700

Link Dupont <[email protected]> • #41

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies??? (was: ClamAV 0.70)

Tue, 04 May 2004 11:11:46 -0500

Les Mikesell <[email protected]> • #40

Re: Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies??? (was: ClamAV 0.70)

Tue, 04 May 2004 09:25:27 -0600

"Oscar A. Valdez" <[email protected]> • #39

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 4 May 2004 11:36:18 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #38

Re: Re: Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 04 May 2004 11:22:19 +0200

Bent Terp <[email protected]> • #37

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 4 May 2004 11:10:26 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #36

Zero-tolerance educational methods for promoting questionable policies??? (was: ClamAV 0.70)

Tue, 4 May 2004 10:29:10 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #35

interrepo overlap physfs and paragui

Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:15:22 +0200

Rudolf Kastl <[email protected]> • #34

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:00:11 +0200

Thomas Vander Stichele <[email protected]> • #33

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:51:16 +0800

Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #32

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:22:59 -0700

Link Dupont <[email protected]> • #31

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:17:48 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #30

Re: Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:04:37 +0200

Thomas Vander Stichele <[email protected]> • #29

Publicly submittable repository

Tue, 20 Apr 2004 01:53:30 -0700

Link Dupont <[email protected]> • #28

Subversion and SPEC

Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:23:10 +0800

Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #27

Re: Re: mozilla epoch madness

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:01:01 -0500

Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #26

Re: Re: mozilla epoch madness

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:26:34 +0100

Matthew Hall <[email protected]> • #25

Re: Re: mozilla epoch madness

Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:36:04 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #24

Re: mozilla epoch madness

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:44:54 -0400

Christopher Blizzard <[email protected]> • #23

mozilla epoch madness (was: Galeon appears to be broken)

Tue, 13 Apr 2004 03:18:54 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #22

Re: Re: folder structure

Fri, 9 Apr 2004 07:51:29 +0200 (CEST)

Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #21

Re: folder structure

Fri, 9 Apr 2004 07:36:30 +0200

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #20

Re: Re: mach and conditional BuildRequires:

Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:56:36 +0800

Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #19

Re: Conditionals in spec files (was: DAR)

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 17:53:08 +0800

Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #18