gmane.mail.spam.crm114 archive

811 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 9). Latest articles →

Re: 'Floating point exception'
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:19:46 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9249
Re: return value
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:49:27 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9248
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:34:47 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9247
return value
Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:33:26 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9246
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:00:08 +0300
Eugene Crosser <[email protected]> • #9245
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:26:08 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9244
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:24:07 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9243
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:20:36 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9242
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:59:53 -0400
Kurt Hackenberg <[email protected]> • #9241
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:13:15 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9240
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:04:31 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9239
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:38:59 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9238
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:47:20 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9237
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:01:25 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9236
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:25:51 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9235
Re: regex for EOF
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:14:12 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9234
Re: regex for EOF
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:11:51 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9233
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:52:24 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9232
regex for EOF
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:37:35 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9231
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:37:08 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9230
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:00:09 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9229
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:57:06 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9228
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:26:32 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9227
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:17:11 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9226
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:40:47 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9225
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:34:45 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9224
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:53:35 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9223
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:37:45 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9222
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:14:53 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9221
Troubleshooting UNKNOWN ( 0 ) results
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:40:08 -0600
Jeffrey Rice <[email protected]> • #9220
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:42:14 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9219
New Sourceforge repository, https://sourceforge.net/projects/crm114-devel/, for development software
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:47:01 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9218
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:44:10 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9217
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:43:37 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9216
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:41:16 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9215
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:24:51 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9214
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:53:16 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9213
Re: 'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:39:53 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9212
'Floating point exception'
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:41:51 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9211
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:32:23 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #9210
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:47:36 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9209
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:03:28 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9208
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:55:55 -0400
"Eric S. Johansson" <[email protected]> • #9207
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:40:41 -0400
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9206
Re: features/tokens
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:27:45 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9205
Re: features/tokens
Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:29:55 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9204
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:53:27 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9203
Re: Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:33:03 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9202
Special Interest Groups - HTTP/CGI and SMTP/MIME
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:50:05 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9201
Re: trap works funny
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:05:10 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9200
Re: trap works funny
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:20:02 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9199
Re: trap works funny
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:33:11 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9198
Re: trap works funny
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:43:51 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9197
Re: trap works funny
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:31:58 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9196
Re: trap works funny
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:26:53 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9195
Re: topic classifier, take 3
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:32:50 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9194
trap works funny
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:41:26 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9193
Re: topic classifier, take 3
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:17:52 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9192
topic classifier, take 3
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:50:49 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9191
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Sun, 8 Mar 2009 10:06:50 +1100
Jason White <[email protected]> • #9190
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:35:05 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9189
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 19:18:18 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9188
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:09:54 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9187
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:34:05 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9186
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:34:57 +0200 (EET)
Jaakko Hyvätti <[email protected]> • #9185
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:25:57 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9184
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Fri, 6 Mar 2009 05:39:48 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9183
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:55:20 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9182
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:38:34 +0100
"Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #9181
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 12:07:37 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9180
Re: Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:12:05 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9179
Re: second attempt at dstttr training
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:53:40 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9178
Use tre wide char
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:42:04 -0700
"Trever L. Adams" <[email protected]> • #9177
Trying to get Windows building CRM114
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:39:24 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9176
Re: second attempt at dstttr training
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:31:01 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9175
Re: second attempt at dstttr training
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:27:08 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9174
Re: second attempt at dstttr training
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:16:40 +0100
"Gerrit E.G. Hobbelt" <[email protected]> • #9173
Re: second attempt at dstttr training
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:34:20 +0100
Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> • #9172
second attempt at dstttr training
Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:28:30 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9171
Re: Is anyone using autoconf before 2.59, or automake before 1.10?
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:39:17 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9170
Is anyone using autoconf before 2.59, or automake before 1.10?
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:08:22 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9169
Re: 'tried to fork your minions'
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:09:15 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9168
'tried to fork your minions'
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:31:15 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9167
Re: when crm can't read a file
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:25:55 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9166
Re: when crm can't read a file
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:42:52 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9165
when crm can't read a file
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:36:21 +0100
Thomas Michael Hagen <[email protected]> • #9164
Re: Getting a message's current score and status using only the sfid?
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 07:10:43 +0000 (UTC)
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #9163
Re: Getting a message's current score and status using only the sfid?
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:01:31 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9162
Re: Getting a message's current score an d status using only the sfid?
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:55:49 +0000 (UTC)
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #9161
Re: Getting a message's current score and status using only the sfid?
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:44:27 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9160
Re: Cleaning up copyright notices, as part of preparing to build a separate library
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:38:20 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9159
Re: Cleaning up copyright notices, as part of preparing to build a separate library
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:48:16 -0500
Bill Yerazunis <[email protected]> • #9158
Cleaning up copyright notices, as part of preparing to build a separate library
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:48:37 -0500
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> • #9157
Re: Getting a message's current score an d status using only the sfid?
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:13:46 +0000 (UTC)
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #9156
Re: Getting a message's current score and status using only the sfid?
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:29:38 +0100
Paolo <[email protected]> • #9155
Getting a message's current score and status using only the sfid?
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:35:54 +0000 (UTC)
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #9154
Re: Using crm114 for non-email discrimination
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:23:40 +0000 (UTC)
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #9153
Re: Using crm114 for non-email discrimination
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:45:11 -0700
Chris Babcock <[email protected]> • #9152
Using crm114 for non-email discrimination
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:14:46 +0000 (UTC)
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #9151
Re: scoped crm114 script variables --> in case you were wondering about match/bound vars, or: two mind altering substances that come out of MA, USA
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:42:43 -0500
Kurt Hackenberg <[email protected]> • #9150
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.