gmane.music.dadl.ot archive

7592 archived articles, newest first (page 47 of 76). Latest articles →

Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:16:19 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69658
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:21:17 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69657
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:20:48 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69656
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:19:50 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69655
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69654
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:18:02 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69653
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:16:42 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69652
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:16:35 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69651
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:15:36 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69650
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69649
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:13:27 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69648
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:12:30 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69647
sacred (was: oh please.)
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:11:21 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69646
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:09:47 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69645
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:08:14 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69644
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:08:04 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69643
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:06:11 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69642
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:04:53 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69641
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:04:51 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69640
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:03:35 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69639
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:02:00 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69638
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:00:44 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69637
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69636
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:00:14 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69635
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:59:41 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69634
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:59:37 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69633
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69632
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:59:13 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69631
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:58:08 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69630
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:57:52 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69629
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:57:24 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69628
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:57:02 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69627
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:56:42 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69626
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:56:37 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69625
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:56:01 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69624
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:55:27 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69623
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:55:09 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69622
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:55:01 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69621
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:54:57 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69620
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:54:37 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69619
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69618
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:51:16 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69617
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:49:59 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69616
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:49:29 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69615
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:47:48 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69614
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:46:58 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69613
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:46:31 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69612
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:45:18 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69611
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:43:42 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69610
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69609
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:39:06 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69608
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:34:41 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69607
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:33:03 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69606
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:31:34 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69605
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:29:22 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69604
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:29:06 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69603
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:27:43 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69602
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:27:02 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69601
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69600
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:25:30 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69599
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:25:10 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69598
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:22:29 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69597
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:22:21 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69596
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:10:28 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69595
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:53:55 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69594
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:49:18 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69593
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69592
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69591
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:47:36 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69590
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:45:55 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69589
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:42:16 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69588
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:41:52 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69587
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:40:55 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69586
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:40:02 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69585
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:37:52 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69584
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:37:28 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69583
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:37:10 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69582
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:33:04 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69581
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69580
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69579
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:27:35 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69578
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:27:14 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69577
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:24:13 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69576
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:24:09 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69575
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:16:10 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69574
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:21:19 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69573
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:20:40 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69572
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:11:03 -0800
"Karl" <[email protected]> • #69571
Re: oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Mike Findlay <[email protected]> • #69570
oh please.
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:46:49 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69569
Re: Illinois Senate Approves Ban on Death Penalty
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:37:22 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69568
Re: Illinois Senate Approves Ban on Death Penalty
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:21:37 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69567
Re: Illinois Senate Approves Ban on Death Penalty
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:55:19 -0600
pcg <[email protected]> • #69566
Illinois Senate Approves Ban on Death Penalty
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 08:29:33 -0700
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> • #69565
Letter from Jack Kerouac to Marlon Brando
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:13:40 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69564
SF author finds reasons to be cheerful
Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:34:10 -0600
Johne Cook <[email protected]> • #69563
Toward Sensible Monetary Policy
Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:48:32 -0600
"david white" <[email protected]> • #69562
Henry Kissinger's greatest crime
Sun, 09 Jan 2011 19:36:18 -0800 (PST)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69561
The Incitement Double Standard
Sun, 09 Jan 2011 19:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69560
Left Shamelessly Seeks to Exploit Arizona Tragedy
Sun, 09 Jan 2011 19:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Peter Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> • #69559
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.