gmane.comp.xfree86.forum archive

2860 archived articles, newest first (page 26 of 29). Latest articles →

Re: FW: XFree86 future
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:24:20 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #360
Re: communication
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:13:34 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #359
FW: XFree86 future
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:15:51 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #358
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 21:02:51 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #357
Re: Re: bugzilla for XFree
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 01:52:16 +0000
José Fonseca <[email protected]> • #356
Re: communication
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 20:44:37 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #355
Re: bugzilla for XFree
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 20:44:37 +0000 (UTC)
Nilmoni Deb <[email protected]> • #354
Re: communication
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 01:24:29 +0000
Alan Hourihane <[email protected]> • #353
Re: bugzilla for XFree
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:07:36 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #352
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 20:06:10 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #351
communication
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 20:03:07 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #350
Re: bugzilla for XFree
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:49:43 -0500 (EST)
Nilmoni Deb <[email protected]> • #349
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:47:04 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #348
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:47:25 +0000
José Fonseca <[email protected]> • #347
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:46:07 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #346
Re: GGI might be the way...
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 01:19:08 +0100 (CET)
Peter Karlsson <[email protected]> • #345
Re: bugzilla for XFree
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:18:56 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #344
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:16:43 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #343
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:12:33 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #342
FW: Re: [Fontconfig] Re: [XFree86] fontconfig and xft2-- where is release 2.1.1?
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:15:35 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #341
Re: the removal of Packard
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:05:55 +0000
Alan Hourihane <[email protected]> • #340
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 19:01:50 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #339
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:59:53 +0000
Derek Fawcus <[email protected]> • #338
Re: Suggestion for XFree86
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:45:01 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #337
bugzilla for XFree
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:35:12 +0000 (UTC)
Nilmoni Deb <[email protected]> • #336
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:19:06 +0000
Keith Whitwell <[email protected]> • #335
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:14:46 +0000
Keith Whitwell <[email protected]> • #334
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:07:36 +0100
Alexander Kellett <[email protected]> • #333
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:35:10 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #332
GGI might be the way...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:16:53 -0800
David Jeske <[email protected]> • #331
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:13:43 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #330
About our effort at NoMachine
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:02:54 +0100
[email protected] • #329
Re: Re: Driver Development vs. X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:53:46 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #328
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:33:57 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #327
NUMA and why XFree86 should keep the wire protocol...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:30:57 -0000
"Keean" <[email protected]> • #326
pointless ?
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Labandion <[email protected]> • #325
Re: Driver development vs X development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:55:19 -0500
Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> • #324
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:41:37 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #323
Re: Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:22:34 +0100
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]> • #322
RE: Impressions so far...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:17:18 -0600
"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]> • #321
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:58:16 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #320
RE: Impressions so far...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:57:08 -0500
"David Wexelblat" <[email protected]> • #319
Re: Suggestion for XFree86
22 Mar 2003 17:25:11 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #318
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:18:11 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #317
Re: Driver development vs X development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:02:10 -0600
Billy Biggs <[email protected]> • #316
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:02:04 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #315
Re: the removal of Packard
22 Mar 2003 16:27:21 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #314
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:26:55 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #313
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:08:03 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #312
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:57:57 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> • #311
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:49:37 +0000
Keith Whitwell <[email protected]> • #310
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:37:03 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #309
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:33:53 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #308
Re: Driver Development vs. X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:04:55 -0800
Roberto J Dohnert <[email protected]> • #307
Re: Impressions so far...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:57:11 -0500
Randy Kramer <[email protected]> • #306
Re: Impressions so far...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:16:01 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #305
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:08:58 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #304
Re: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:56:56 +0000
José Fonseca <[email protected]> • #303
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:30:52 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #302
Re: [Fonts] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 10:44:36 +0000
"Anis Shiekh" <[email protected]> • #301
Impressions so far...
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:26:28 +0100
"Sisel Qwest" <[email protected]> • #300
Re: Driver development vs X development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:26:32 +0000
Keith Whitwell <[email protected]> • #299
Re: the removal of Packard
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:10:21 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> • #298
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:38:10 +0000
Keith Whitwell <[email protected]> • #297
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:37:38 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #296
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:31:45 +0000
Keith Whitwell <[email protected]> • #295
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 02:30:20 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #294
Re: Suggestion for XFree86
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 08:28:42 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> • #293
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:12:12 -0800
Gareth Hughes <[email protected]> • #292
RE: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:59:22 -0600
"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]> • #291
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:29:45 +0100
Sven Luther <[email protected]> • #290
RE: Community government, new developers, release cycle
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:23:40 -0600
"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]> • #289
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:00:38 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #288
Re: Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:31:42 -0800
Alexander Gelfenbain <[email protected]> • #287
Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:19:05 -0800
Alexander Gelfenbain <[email protected]> • #286
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:18:51 -0600
Frank LaMonica <[email protected]> • #285
Re: the removal of Packard
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:38:15 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> • #284
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:30:45 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #283
Re: Suggestion for XFree86
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:29:55 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #282
Re: the removal of Packard
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:26:30 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #281
Go for it Keith!
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 03:23:16 -0000
"port001" <[email protected]> • #280
RE: (huge tangent away from) the removal of Packard
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:23:37 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #279
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:22:31 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #278
Re: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:17:20 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #277
Re: Where are the Render docs?
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:02:04 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #276
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:58:23 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #275
RE: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:49:50 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #274
RE: Community government, new developers, release cycle
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:48:44 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #273
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:45:07 -0500
"G O Economou" <[email protected]> • #272
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:37:08 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #271
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 21:12:33 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #270
RE: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:44:24 -0600
"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]> • #269
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:31:39 -0800
Joseph Moss <[email protected]> • #268
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:19:07 -0600
Frank LaMonica <[email protected]> • #267
RE: Community government, new developers, release cycle
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:07:07 -0600
"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]> • #266
Re: Re: font servers [was: some XFree86 5.0 questions]
21 Mar 2003 19:55:27 -0500
"James H. Cloos Jr." <[email protected]> • #265
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:53:57 +1100
Daniel Stone <[email protected]> • #264
Re: Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development (Egbert Eich)
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:22:41 -0500
David Dawes <[email protected]> • #263
Re: the removal of Packard
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:19:00 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #262
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 19:07:06 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #261
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.