gmane.linux.file-systems.acl.devel archive

357 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: [Acl-Devel] NFSv3 ACL status?
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:49:54 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #57
NFSv3 ACL status?
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:01:39 +0200 (CEST)
Peter Astrand <[email protected]> • #56
RE: [Samba] ACL propegation problem - any known issues?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:41:22 -0400
David Brodbeck <[email protected]> • #55
RE: default ACLs disappearing when used with CVS?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:25:02 -0400
David Brodbeck <[email protected]> • #54
Re: default ACLs disappearing when used with CVS?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:30:15 -0400
Scott Mcdermott <[email protected]> • #53
RE: default ACLs disappearing when used with CVS?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:57:42 -0400
David Brodbeck <[email protected]> • #52
RE: default ACLs disappearing when used with CVS?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:45:47 +0100
"Russell Packer" <[email protected]> • #51
RE: default ACLs disappearing when used with CVS?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:40:39 -0400
David Brodbeck <[email protected]> • #50
Re: default ACLs disappearing when used with CVS?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:10:52 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #49
default ACLs disappearing when used with CVS?
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:56:21 -0400
Scott Mcdermott <[email protected]> • #48
(no subject)
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 22:56:09 +0100
"Ag" <[email protected]> • #47
R: acl-devel Digest, Vol 9, Issue 2
Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:56:53 +0200
"Toia Andrea" <[email protected]> • #46
Re: Patch kernel
Fri, 6 Aug 2004 08:46:01 +0700
"david" <[email protected]> • #45
Re: Patch kernel
Thu, 05 Aug 2004 13:13:08 +0200
Robert <[email protected]> • #44
Patch kernel
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:48:05 +0700
"david" <[email protected]> • #43
Re: ls command
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:01:32 +0700
"david" <[email protected]> • #42
(no subject)
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:00:02 +0200
"toia\.andrea\@libero\.it" <[email protected]> • #41
RE: ls command
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:54:21 +0100
"Russell Packer" <[email protected]> • #40
ls command
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:48:35 +0200
"toia\.andrea\@libero\.it" <[email protected]> • #39
Re: fedora 2 kernel patch
03 Aug 2004 13:34:18 +0100
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <[email protected]> • #38
fedora 2 kernel patch
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 01:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
Sigit <[email protected]> • #37
Re: recursively copying access ACL to default ACL
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 09:03:20 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #36
Re: question about mask inheritance
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:56:47 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #35
question about mask inheritance
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:34:57 -0400
Scott Mcdermott <[email protected]> • #34
recursively copying access ACL to default ACL
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:01:52 -0400
Scott Mcdermott <[email protected]> • #33
How about kernel 2.4.26
Thu, 10 Jun 2004 09:29:07 +0200
robert de geus <[email protected]> • #32
Re: precedence of entries
Wed, 09 Jun 2004 14:15:40 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #31
precedence of entries
Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:28:25 +0200
paul k <[email protected]> • #30
Re: getfacl doesn't show same output as ls?
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 13:46:17 +1000
Tim Shimmin <[email protected]> • #29
Re: nfsacl umask inconsitency
Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:33:13 +0200
Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> • #28
Re: getfacl doesn't show same output as ls?
07 Jun 2004 22:12:56 -0500
David Kleikamp <[email protected]> • #27
Re: getfacl doesn't show same output as ls?
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 22:51:40 -0400
Scott Mcdermott <[email protected]> • #26
Re: getfacl doesn't show same output as ls?
07 Jun 2004 21:33:12 -0500
David Kleikamp <[email protected]> • #25
getfacl doesn't show same output as ls?
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 22:08:38 -0400
Scott Mcdermott <[email protected]> • #24
coreutils
Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:58:03 +0100
"Russell Packer" <[email protected]> • #23
debian woody on alpha, coreutils/fileutils with acl
Tue, 25 May 2004 17:28:05 +0200
[email protected] • #22
Looking for Red Hat 9 kernel w/ACL
Mon, 24 May 2004 10:57:32 -0700
"Michael St. Laurent" <[email protected]> • #21
Re: nfsacl umask inconsitency
Mon, 24 May 2004 19:51:38 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #20
nfsacl umask inconsitency
Sun, 23 May 2004 18:21:34 +0200
Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> • #19
Re: 2.4.26
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:50:01 -0500
Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> • #18
Re: 2.4.26
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:13:04 +0200
Andre Tomt <[email protected]> • #17
Re: 2.4.26
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 21:52:16 +0200
Andre Tomt <[email protected]> • #16
Re: 2.4.26
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:31:41 -0500
Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> • #15
2.4.26
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:25:36 -0500
Richard Houston <[email protected]> • #14
Re: Processes hang when using ReiserFS with ACL-Patch
Sat, 10 Apr 2004 13:20:47 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #13
Processes hang when using ReiserFS with ACL-Patch
Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:54:39 +0200
Peter Bücker <[email protected]> • #12
Re: ext3 xattr broken on 2.6.4 onwards?
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:16:11 +0800
Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> • #11
Re: ext3 xattr broken on 2.6.4 onwards?
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:06:57 +0800
Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> • #10
Re: ext3 xattr broken on 2.6.4 onwards?
Sun, 4 Apr 2004 20:43:24 +0200
Peter Rullmann <[email protected]> • #9
Re: ext3 xattr broken on 2.6.4 onwards?
Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:59:05 +0800
Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> • #8
Re: ext3 xattr broken on 2.6.4 onwards?
Sat, 3 Apr 2004 08:04:22 -0700
Andreas Dilger <[email protected]> • #7
ext3 xattr broken on 2.6.4 onwards?
Sat, 03 Apr 2004 16:26:48 +0800
Rogelio Serrano <[email protected]> • #6
Re: Re: getxattr over NFS returns EIO instead of EOPNOTSUPP
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:04:50 +0200
Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]> • #5
Re: getxattr over NFS returns EIO instead of EOPNOTSUPP
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:50:41 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #4
Problems use setfacl
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 13:58:48 -0300
"Cristiano Sgarioni" <[email protected]> • #3
Studing ACL's
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:13:31 -0300
"Cristiano Sgarioni" <[email protected]> • #2
Re: [patch] linux-2.4 Ext2/3 compatibility problem with EAs onsymlinks
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:42:48 +0100
"Andreas Gruenbacher" <[email protected]> • #1
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.