gmane.mail.nullmailer

88 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

reproducible crash when calling nullmailer-smtpd from swaks
Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:07:14 -0300
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #350
mismatched new char[] with delete.
Fri, 15 Oct 2021 21:16:15 -0300
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #349
Feature requests from a new user
Mon, 18 May 2020 00:54:33 -0700
"za3k.za3k.com via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #348
symlinks for configuration files
Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:46:10 +0200
"Thierry B. via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #347
Configuring Authentication for Sending Client
Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:53:24 +0800
"K.Kong" <[email protected]> • #346
Re: from ssmtp to nullmailer
Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:43:27 +0900
[email protected] (황병희) • #345
Re: from ssmtp to nullmailer
Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:32:33 +0900
[email protected] (황병희) • #344
Re: from ssmtp to nullmailer
Sun, 1 Dec 2019 12:03:41 -0500
Sean MacLennan <[email protected]> • #343
from ssmtp to nullmailer
Sun, 01 Dec 2019 23:51:35 +0900
[email protected] (황병희) • #342
'Protocol error' when sending using OpenSMTPD as a relay
Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:18:09 -0700
Robert Gill <[email protected]> • #341
Local mail
Tue, 03 Sep 2019 10:59:43 -0500
Calvin Arndt <[email protected]> • #340
Re: Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Sat, 29 Dec 2018 00:50:28 +0100 (CET)
"harald.a-little-linux-box.at via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #339
Re: Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 16:56:59 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #338
Re: Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Thu, 27 Dec 2018 09:30:37 +0100
"Harald Jenny via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #337
Re: Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Wed, 26 Dec 2018 21:45:55 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #336
Re: Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Tue, 25 Dec 2018 05:13:52 +0100
"Harald Jenny via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #335
Re: Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:01:42 +0900
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #334
Re: Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Mon, 24 Dec 2018 16:36:58 +0100
"Harald Jenny via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #333
Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:06:29 +0900
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #332
Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Fri, 21 Dec 2018 07:50:18 +0100 (CET)
"harald.a-little-linux-box.at via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #331
Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Fri, 21 Dec 2018 07:36:00 +0900
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #330
Re: test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:38:32 +0100 (CET)
"harald.a-little-linux-box.at via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #329
test failures for 2.2 on Debian buildd's
Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:31:42 +0900
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #328
Re: nullmailer failing with gnutls >= 3.6.3 under Debian
Sat, 13 Oct 2018 13:25:48 +0200 (CEST)
"harald.a-little-linux-box.at via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #327
Announcing nullmailer version 2.2
Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:51:49 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #326
Re: nullmailer failing with gnutls >= 3.6.3 under Debian
Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:51:17 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #325
Re: nullmailer failing with gnutls >= 3.6.3 under Debian
Fri, 12 Oct 2018 07:46:07 +0200 (CEST)
"harald.a-little-linux-box.at via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #324
Re: nullmailer failing with gnutls >= 3.6.3 under Debian
Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:14:23 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #323
nullmailer failing with gnutls >= 3.6.3 under Debian
Fri, 5 Oct 2018 15:22:25 +0200
"harald.a-little-linux-box.at via nullmailer" <[email protected]> • #322
selecting remotes based on envelope sender
Wed, 04 Jul 2018 20:55:42 -0300
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #321
Re: Sendmail alias does not respond to dot???
Tue, 29 May 2018 10:59:59 -0600
Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> • #320
Sendmail alias does not respond to dot???
Tue, 29 May 2018 11:54:11 -0500
Calvin Arndt <[email protected]> • #319
Re: Gmail SMTP typo in password is not handled gracefully
Sat, 27 Jan 2018 14:17:27 +0100
Fejes József <[email protected]> • #318
Re: Gmail SMTP typo in password is not handled gracefully
Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:32:58 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #317
Re: Gmail SMTP typo in password is not handled gracefully
Wed, 17 Jan 2018 07:46:29 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #316
Gmail SMTP typo in password is not handled gracefully
Tue, 9 Jan 2018 21:58:25 +0100
Fejes József <[email protected]> • #315
Announcing nullmailer version 2.1
Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:38:30 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #314
Re: failing test on Debian
Tue, 24 Oct 2017 12:11:29 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #313
failing test on Debian
Tue, 01 Aug 2017 18:29:57 -0400
David Bremner <[email protected]> • #312
Re: NullMailer -- Email Sending Delays
Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:10:16 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #311
Re: Compiling nullmailer in OpenBSD
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 13:21:54 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #310
NullMailer -- Email Sending Delays
Sat, 11 Feb 2017 11:30:13 -0800
iceal thaddeus lim <[email protected]> • #309
Compiling nullmailer in OpenBSD
Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:59:03 -0600
Emilio Perea <[email protected]> • #308
Re: Nullmailer tries to re-send after permanent error 552
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:23:52 -0600
Bruce Guenter <[email protected]> • #305
Re: Nullmailer tries to re-send after permanent error 552
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:06:35 -0600
Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> • #304
RE: Nullmailer tries to re-send after permanent error 552
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:35:48 +0000
Patrick Campbell <[email protected]> • #303
Re: Nullmailer tries to re-send after permanent error 552
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:23:40 -0600
Charles Cazabon <[email protected]> • #302
Nullmailer tries to re-send after permanent error 552
Mon, 28 Apr 2014 18:42:56 +0000
Patrick Campbell <[email protected]> • #301
Re: Bug#271662: Pseudo code included. Is it a small step towards better LSB compliance for sendmail interface?
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:48:53 +0000
Nick Leverton <[email protected]> • #248
Re: Pseudo code included. Is it a small step towards better LSB compliance for sendmail interface?
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:52:06 -0800 (PST)
Regid Ichira <[email protected]> • #247