perl.perl6.meta archive

383 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Perl, the new generation
Thu, 10 May 2001 17:36:37 +0100
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #798
Re: Perl, the new generation
Thu, 10 May 2001 12:30:20 -0400
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #797
Re: Perl, the new generation
Thu, 10 May 2001 09:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Larry Wall) • #796
Re: Perl, the new generation
Thu, 10 May 2001 17:23:01 +0100
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #795
Perl, the new generation
Thu, 10 May 2001 09:20:13 -0700
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #794
Re: Traffic lights and language design
Fri, 4 May 2001 18:33:08 -0700
[email protected] ("Nathan Wiger") • #793
Re: Traffic lights and language design
Fri, 4 May 2001 16:31:50 -0700
[email protected] (Nathan Wiger) • #792
Traffic lights and language design
Fri, 4 May 2001 23:51:02 +0100
[email protected] (Michael G Schwern) • #791
[meta] perl.org mail, ftp.cpan.org, www.perl.org and so on...
Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #790
perl.org & cpan.org mail
Fri, 27 Apr 2001 23:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #789
Meta-help on development of perl
Fri, 9 Mar 2001 18:01:54 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #788
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:55:41 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #787
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 01:43:18 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #786
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:17:10
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #785
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:03:26 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #784
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:39:11 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #783
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:33:28 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #782
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:27:24 -0700 (MST)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #781
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:24:58 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #780
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:12:05 -0500
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #779
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:19:13 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #778
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:12:56 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #777
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:40 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #776
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:41:22 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #775
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 21:11:03 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #774
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:04:31 -0500
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #773
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:39:25 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #772
The PDD process revisited....
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:37:50 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #771
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 20:31:23 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #770
Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:00:45 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #769
Re: Things have paused... really?
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:07:29 -0500
[email protected] (Kirrily Robert) • #768
Re: State of PDD 0
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 11:47:28 +0000 (GMT)
[email protected] (David Mitchell) • #767
Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...)
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 03:42:52 -0500
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #766
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected].... Actaually have a good name sugest
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 21:33:42
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #765
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected].... Actaually have a good name sugest
22 Feb 2001 03:05:20 -0000
[email protected] ("John van V") • #764
Re: State of PDD 0
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 16:17:23 -0500
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #763
Re: State of PDD 0
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:44:51 +0000 (GMT)
[email protected] (David Mitchell) • #762
Re: Things have paused... really?
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:02:38 -0500
[email protected] • #761
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build andsmoke test
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:13:08 -0500
[email protected] ("Stephen P. Potter") • #760
Re: State of PDD 0
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:33:20 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #759
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build andsmoke test
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:27:17 +0100
[email protected] (Richard Foley) • #758
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build andsmoke test
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:36:38 +0100
[email protected] (Richard Foley) • #757
Re: State of PDD 0
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 01:22:31 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #756
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:45:34 -0500
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #755
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:32:01 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #754
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:24:09 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #753
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:16:22 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #752
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:13:08 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #751
Re: State of PDD 0
Wed, 21 Feb 2001 02:12:33 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #750
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:13:14 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #749
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:08:31 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #748
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:06:13 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #747
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:58:03 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #746
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:32:07 -0500
[email protected] (Adam Turoff) • #745
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:19:26 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #744
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:49:36 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #743
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:17:18 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #742
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:09:06 -0600
[email protected] ("David L. Nicol") • #741
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:06:17 -0000
[email protected] ("Mike Lacey") • #740
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:47:50 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #739
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:01:03 -0700 (MST)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #738
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:53:36 -0000
[email protected] ("Mike Lacey") • #737
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:43:28 -0600
[email protected] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) • #736
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:42:01 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #735
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:14 -0800
[email protected] (Peter Scott) • #734
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:38:37 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] (Ask Bjoern Hansen) • #733
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:30:42 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #732
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:51:35 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #731
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:36:21 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #730
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:31:34 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #729
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:15:56 -0700 (MST)
[email protected] (Nathan Torkington) • #728
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:03:34 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #727
Re: Things have paused... really?
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:45:27 -0600 (CST)
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky) • #726
Re: Things have paused... really?
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:36:35 -0500
[email protected] ("David H. Adler") • #725
Re: Things have paused... really?
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:33:48 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #724
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:31:41 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #723
Re: Things have paused... really?
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:32:54 -0600 (CST)
[email protected] (Dave Rolsky) • #722
Re: Things have paused... really?
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:55:44 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #721
Things have paused... really?
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:10:53 -0600
[email protected] (Garrett Goebel) • #720
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:05:10 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #719
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:22:30 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #718
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:45:01 +0000 (GMT)
[email protected] (David Mitchell) • #717
Re: State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:24:56 +0000
[email protected] (Simon Cozens) • #716
State of PDD 0
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:05:57 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #715
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:47:58 -0500
[email protected] (Bryan C . Warnock) • #714
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 07:56:42 -0500
[email protected] ("Stephen P. Potter") • #713
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:30:12 +0000
[email protected] (Alan Burlison) • #712
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:56:39 -0600
[email protected] (Elaine -HFB- Ashton) • #711
Re: RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:38:03 -0500
[email protected] (Dan Sugalski) • #710
RFC 362 - revisiting the RFC process (was Warnings, strict, and CPAN)
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:20:33 -0800
[email protected] (Edward Peschko) • #709
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:11:13
[email protected] ("David Grove") • #708
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:49:32 +0100
[email protected] (Bart Lateur) • #707
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 23:49:24 +0100
[email protected] • #706
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:40:47 -0500
[email protected] (Uri Guttman) • #705
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:42:05 +0000
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #704
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:55:46 +0300
[email protected] ("Vadim Konovalov") • #703
RE: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:55:21 -0300
[email protected] ("Fabio") • #702
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:50:04 -0500
[email protected] (Chris Nandor) • #701
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 15:45:42 +0000
[email protected] (Tim Bunce) • #700
Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test
Mon, 19 Feb 2001 07:40:01 -0800 (PST)
[email protected] (Jonathan Atzger) • #699
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.