gmane.comp.programming.refactoring archive

405 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 5). Latest articles →

Re: To be compliant to J2EE, a webapp should not use any thread
Wed, 26 May 2010 15:14:20 -0300
Alberto Ivo <[email protected]> • #9548
Re: To be compliant to J2EE, a webapp should not use any thread
Wed, 26 May 2010 10:04:18 -0700
Kaleb Pederson <[email protected]> • #9547
To be compliant to J2EE, a webapp should not use any thread
Wed, 26 May 2010 11:53:47 -0300
Alberto Ivo <[email protected]> • #9546
Re: Re: Why variables that we don't modify should be final?
Tue, 25 May 2010 20:06:01 -0300
Alberto Ivo <[email protected]> • #9545
Re: Why variables that we don't modify should be final?
Tue, 25 May 2010 15:52:05 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9544
Re: Why variables that we don't modify should be final?
Tue, 25 May 2010 22:03:32 -0000
"jcsextro" <[email protected]> • #9543
Re: List Management...
Tue, 25 May 2010 17:08:49 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #9542
Re: Why variables that we don't modify should be final?
Tue, 25 May 2010 16:25:10 -0500
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #9541
Why variables that we don't modify should be final?
Tue, 25 May 2010 16:56:26 -0300
Alberto Ivo <[email protected]> • #9540
Re: List Management...
Tue, 25 May 2010 11:17:10 -0700
Joshua Kerievsky <[email protected]> • #9539
Re: List Management...
Tue, 25 May 2010 11:20:53 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #9538
Re: List Management...
Tue, 25 May 2010 07:33:52 -0700
Joshua Kerievsky <[email protected]> • #9537
List Management...
Tue, 25 May 2010 07:14:53 -0700
Joshua Kerievsky <[email protected]> • #9536
Re: TDD for numerical algorithms
Tue, 25 May 2010 01:53:39 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9535
Re: TDD for numerical algorithms
Tue, 25 May 2010 01:35:50 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9534
Re: TDD for numerical algorithms
Mon, 24 May 2010 23:47:43 -0400
Jim Murphy <[email protected]> • #9533
Test Message - Please Ignore
Mon, 24 May 2010 23:26:18 -0700
Joshua Kerievsky <[email protected]> • #9532
Re: Moderation: captainblake's blackberry
Mon, 24 May 2010 23:06:20 -0700
Joshua Kerievsky <[email protected]> • #9531
Re: TDD for numerical algorithms
Tue, 25 May 2010 00:29:48 -0500
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #9530
Re: Moderation: captainblake's blackberry
Mon, 24 May 2010 22:00:53 -0700
Kaleb Pederson <[email protected]> • #9529
Re: TDD for numerical algorithms
Mon, 24 May 2010 22:55:52 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9528
Re: Moderation: captainblake's blackberry
Mon, 24 May 2010 22:49:27 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9527
Re: Moderation: captainblake's blackberry
Mon, 24 May 2010 23:25:11 -0400
Cory Foy <[email protected]> • #9526
Re: Moderation: captainblake's blackberry
Mon, 24 May 2010 23:05:37 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #9525
Moderation: captainblake's blackberry
Mon, 24 May 2010 19:33:36 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9524
Re: TDD for numerical algorithms
Mon, 24 May 2010 19:24:58 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9523
TDD for numerical algorithms
Mon, 24 May 2010 19:35:21 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9522
Re: Suites for testing automated refactoring tools
Sat, 22 May 2010 21:17:09 -0700
Kaleb Pederson <[email protected]> • #9521
Suites for testing automated refactoring tools
Sun, 23 May 2010 00:39:54 -0000
"K. Cassell" <[email protected]> • #9520
Re: Refactoring / Smell detection samples ! += ?
Tue, 11 May 2010 20:56:31 -0000
"K. Cassell" <[email protected]> • #9519
Re: Refactoring / Smell detection samples ! += ?
Tue, 11 May 2010 09:58:35 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9518
Re: Refactoring / Smell detection samples ! += ?
Tue, 11 May 2010 11:20:32 +0200
Daniel Speicher <[email protected]> • #9517
Re: Refactoring / Smell detection samples ! += ?
Mon, 10 May 2010 17:42:24 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9516
Refactoring / Smell detection samples ! += ?
Mon, 10 May 2010 21:31:33 +0200
Daniel Speicher <[email protected]> • #9515
Re: automated refactoring for JavaScript?
Mon, 10 May 2010 11:53:57 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9514
Re: automated refactoring for JavaScript?
Mon, 10 May 2010 13:30:21 -0500
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #9513
Re: automated refactoring for JavaScript?
Sun, 09 May 2010 13:03:31 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9512
automated refactoring for JavaScript?
Sun, 9 May 2010 19:51:10 +0100
Paul Jenkins <[email protected]> • #9511
Re: automated refactoring for JavaScript?
Sun, 9 May 2010 19:49:25 +0100
Paul Jenkins <[email protected]> • #9510
automated refactoring for JavaScript?
Sun, 09 May 2010 12:42:57 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9509
ANN: Helsinki - Advanced TDD Techniques, Steve Freeman, May 10th
Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:46:08 -0000
"marko_oikarinen" <[email protected]> • #9508
Re: Chatting about Extract Class
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:05:41 -0000
"K. Cassell" <[email protected]> • #9507
RE: Chatting about Extract Class
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:31:34 -0400
"Hameed, Mudassir (Gale)" <[email protected]> • #9506
moreUnit Plugin
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Lehmia Kirn <[email protected]> • #9505
Pro*C Code Refactoring
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:45:42 -0000
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #9504
Re: Chatting about Extract Class
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:25:28 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9503
Re: Chatting about Extract Class
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:41:34 -0600
Richard <[email protected]> • #9502
Re: Chatting about Extract Class
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:43:00 -0700
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9501
Re: Chatting about Extract Class
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:42:48 -0700
Adam Sroka <[email protected]> • #9500
Chatting about Extract Class
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:15:36 -0000
"K. Cassell" <[email protected]> • #9499
Re: Re: Large Java classes wanted
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:34:45 -0800
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9498
Re: Re: Large Java classes wanted
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:49:47 -0500
Buddha Buck <[email protected]> • #9497
Re: Large Java classes wanted
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:09:47 -0000
"K. Cassell" <[email protected]> • #9496
Re: Re: Large Java classes wanted
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:27:46 -0800
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9495
Re: Large Java classes wanted
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:55:05 -0000
"K" <[email protected]> • #9494
Re: Large Java classes wanted
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:26:50 -0800
J Arrizza <[email protected]> • #9493
Re: Large Java classes wanted
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:23:08 +1100
Heinrich Breedt <[email protected]> • #9492
Re: Large Java classes wanted
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:12:48 -0500
Michael New <[email protected]> • #9491
Large Java classes wanted
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:44:08 -0000
"K" <[email protected]> • #9490
Check out my shelves
Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:22:47 -0800
Pat <[email protected]> • #9489
Re: Self-document code -> dependencies
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:18:26 -0500
Greg Akins <[email protected]> • #9488
Re: Self-document code -> dependencies
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:51:15 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #9487
Re: Self-document code -> dependencies
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:50:25 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #9486
Re: Self-document code -> dependencies
Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:42:16 -0500
Ken Liu <[email protected]> • #9485
CFP: 26th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM)
Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:55:27 -0600
Danny Dig <[email protected]> • #9484
Re: Self-document code -> dependencies
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 05:42:46 -0500
Greg Akins <[email protected]> • #9483
Re: Self-document code -> dependencies
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:15:35 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #9482
Self-document code -> dependencies
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:41:21 -0500
Greg Akins <[email protected]> • #9481
Re: Eclipse refactoring plugin code required urgently
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:34:35 -0700
Richard <[email protected]> • #9480
Eclipse refactoring plugin code required urgently
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:29:35 -0800 (PST)
Lehmia Kirn <[email protected]> • #9479
Re: Literate style with a nod to Hamcrest matchers - good or bad?
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:21:56 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #9478
Re: Literate style with a nod to Hamcrest matchers - good or bad?
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:17:22 -0700
Richard <[email protected]> • #9477
Re: Literate style with a nod to Hamcrest matchers - good or bad?
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:48:59 -0700
Steven Gordon <[email protected]> • #9476
Literate style with a nod to Hamcrest matchers - good or bad?
Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:17:11 -0000
"simonvarley99" <[email protected]> • #9475
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:36:31 -0800
Phil Goodwin <[email protected]> • #9474
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:54:11 -0700
Richard <[email protected]> • #9473
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:28:32 -0800
Dale Emery <[email protected]> • #9472
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:07:04 -0700
Richard <[email protected]> • #9471
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:59:06 -0800
Dale Emery <[email protected]> • #9470
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:54:05 -0700
Richard <[email protected]> • #9469
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:22:10 +0000
Jeff Foster <[email protected]> • #9468
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:16:31 -0500
George Dinwiddie <[email protected]> • #9467
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:30:16 +0100
Olof Bjarnason <[email protected]> • #9466
RE: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:07:42 +0000
"Donaldson, John (GEO)" <[email protected]> • #9465
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:30:06 -0500
George Dinwiddie <[email protected]> • #9464
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:12:16 +0100
Markus Knittig <[email protected]> • #9463
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:38:54 -0500
George Dinwiddie <[email protected]> • #9462
Re: Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:47:43 -0500
William Wake <[email protected]> • #9461
Literate style, making code more readable or going overboard?
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:21:36 -0000
"aglet_sesamoid" <[email protected]> • #9460
C++ Refactoring Tools Test Suite Available
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:20:24 -0700
Richard <[email protected]> • #9459
Re: list of opensource refactoring tools
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:04:37 -0800 (PST)
Abdulaziz Alkhalid <[email protected]> • #9458
Re: list of opensource refactoring tools
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:58:30 -0500
Jeff Waltzer <[email protected]> • #9457
list of opensource refactoring tools
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Lehmia Kirn <[email protected]> • #9456
Re: Question about thesis python and refactoring
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:49:50 -0000
"Przemys" <[email protected]> • #9455
RE: Refactoring Java Tips
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:24:00 +0100
".MOz" <[email protected]> • #9454
Refactoring Java Tips
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:09:59 -0300
Alberto Ivo <[email protected]> • #9453
Re: Question about thesis python and refactoring
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:19:29 +0100
Mirko Stocker <[email protected]> • #9452
Question about thesis python and refactoring
Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:31:22 -0000
"Przemys" <[email protected]> • #9451
Refactoring Challenge: Michael Hill's "Double-Dog-Dare" on an XWork
Mon, 11 Jan 2010 21:09:14 -0000
"JeffGrigg" <[email protected]> • #9450
Re: Refactoring to a Closure
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:22:22 +0100
Kim Gräsman <[email protected]> • #9449
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.