gmane.ietf.provreg archive

1661 archived articles, newest first (page 9 of 17). Latest articles →

Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 22:57:42 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2487
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:47:35 -0500
Benoit Levac <[email protected]> • #2486
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:30:44 -0600
Howard Eland <[email protected]> • #2485
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:11:08 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2484
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:05:04 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2483
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:55:20 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2482
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:48:04 -0500
MICHAEL YOUNG <[email protected]> • #2481
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:34:17 -0500
MICHAEL YOUNG <[email protected]> • #2480
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:29:23 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #2479
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:53:37 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #2478
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:59:02 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2477
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:54:30 +0100
Peter Koch <[email protected]> • #2476
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:53:45 +0000
"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[email protected]> • #2475
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:52:15 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2474
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:51:46 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2473
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:49:45 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2472
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:45:03 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2471
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:38:50 -0500
MICHAEL YOUNG <[email protected]> • #2470
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:31:36 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2469
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:21:19 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2468
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:02:19 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2467
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:50:00 +0100
Peter Koch <[email protected]> • #2466
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:32:33 +0000
Anthony Kirby <[email protected]> • #2465
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:04:40 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2464
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:59:43 +0000
"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[email protected]> • #2463
Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:43:30 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2462
draft-kong-epp-idn-variants-mapping-00 Submitted for Review
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:29:33 +0800
"Ning Kong" <[email protected]> • #2461
Re: clTRID element clarification
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:46:42 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2460
Re: clTRID element clarification
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:42:52 +0200
Theo Kramer <[email protected]> • #2459
Re: clTRID element clarification
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:52:48 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2458
Re: clTRID element clarification
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:40:33 -0500
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> • #2457
Re: clTRID element clarification
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:21:34 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2456
Re: clTRID element clarification
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:43:40 -0500
Christopher Browne <[email protected]> • #2455
Re: clTRID element clarification
Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:06:38 +0200
Theo Kramer <[email protected]> • #2454
Re: clTRID element clarification
Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:11:49 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #2453
Re: clTRID element clarification
Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:57:02 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2452
clTRID element clarification
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:24:04 +0000
Aaron Roberts <[email protected]> • #2451
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:05:26 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2450
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:27:19 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #2449
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:56:11 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2448
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:48:40 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2447
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:44:58 -0500
"Michael Young" <[email protected]> • #2446
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:18:39 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2445
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:38:07 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2444
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:35:44 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2443
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:57:17 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2442
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:36:01 +0100
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #2441
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:13:42 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2440
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:04:39 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2439
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:01:02 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2438
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:58:50 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2437
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:56:40 +1300
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #2436
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:58:46 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2435
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:40:30 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2434
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:22:48 -0800
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> • #2433
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:19:57 +1300
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #2432
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:09:23 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2431
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:09:00 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2430
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:07:57 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2429
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:58:26 -0500
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #2428
Re: U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:43:13 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2427
U-labels and draft-obispo-epp-idn-00
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:25:05 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2426
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:32:48 +1300
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #2425
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:48:08 +1300
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #2424
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:32:07 +0200
Theo Kramer <[email protected]> • #2423
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:10:37 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2422
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:43:35 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #2421
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:01:42 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #2420
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:02:10 +1300
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #2419
Re: Standard Extensions
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:04:46 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2418
Re: Standard Extensions
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:59:53 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2417
Re: Standard Extensions
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:59:12 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #2416
Re: Standard Extensions
Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:18:22 +0800
"Ning Kong" <[email protected]> • #2415
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:39:04 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #2414
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:49:11 +0000
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2413
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:21:00 -0500
Edward Lewis <[email protected]> • #2412
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:17:05 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2411
Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:58:06 +0000
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2410
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:18:08 +0200
Mike O'Connell <[email protected]> • #2409
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:15:00 +0200
Mike O'Connell <[email protected]> • #2408
Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:58:34 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #2407
Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:53:00 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #2406
Re: Standard Extensions
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:10:51 +0100
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]> • #2405
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:56:45 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2404
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:47:58 +0000
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2403
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:50:10 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2402
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:26:15 -0600
Howard Eland <[email protected]> • #2401
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:23:47 +0000
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #2400
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:20:10 +0200
Theo Kramer <[email protected]> • #2399
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:19:30 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2398
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:09:54 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #2397
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:50:48 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #2396
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:50:29 +0000
"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <[email protected]> • #2395
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 07:48:39 -0600
MICHAEL YOUNG <[email protected]> • #2394
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:36:01 +0100
Bruno Prémont <[email protected]> • #2393
Re: Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:20:50 +0000
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2392
Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:15:03 -0500
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]> • #2391
Standard Extensions
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:50:11 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2390
Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:42:22 +0000
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2389
Re: Changes we'd make to EPP
Wed, 18 Jan 2012 12:27:30 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2388
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.