gmane.ietf.provreg archive

1661 archived articles, newest first (page 8 of 17). Latest articles →

Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:35:26 +1000
Wil Tan <[email protected]> • #2587
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:18:45 +0100
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #2586
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 01:09:57 +1000
Wil Tan <[email protected]> • #2585
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 12:03:08 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2584
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:25:01 +0100
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2583
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:38:43 +0100
Gavin Brown <[email protected]> • #2582
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:10:25 -0400
"Tran, Trung" <[email protected]> • #2581
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:14:49 +1000
Wil Tan <[email protected]> • #2580
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:04:23 +0100
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2579
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:28:31 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2578
Re: Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:13:11 +0100
Keith Gaughan <[email protected]> • #2577
Launch Phase EPP Extension Version 02 Posted
Fri, 10 Aug 2012 14:23:17 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2576
Mailing list to refine the technical interface between the new gTLD Registries and the Trademark Clearinghouse
Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:34:21 -0700
Francisco Arias <[email protected]> • #2575
Re: Verisign granted patent on automated EPP regression testing?
Fri, 11 May 2012 11:44:38 +0000
Anthony Kirby <[email protected]> • #2574
Verisign granted patent on automated EPP regression testing?
Fri, 11 May 2012 07:18:52 +0000
Alexander Mayrhofer <[email protected]> • #2573
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:10:46 +1000
Wil Tan <[email protected]> • #2572
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:10:26 -0700
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> • #2571
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:42:11 -0400
Gregory Berezowsky <[email protected]> • #2570
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:45:30 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2569
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:45:33 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2568
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:12:15 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2567
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:42:24 +0000
Maarten Wullink <[email protected]> • #2566
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:31:09 +0200
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #2565
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:25:08 +0800
"Linlin Zhou" <[email protected]> • #2564
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:29:39 -0400
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #2563
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:21:56 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2562
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:47:44 -0400
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #2561
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:46:47 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2560
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:25:16 +0000
Maarten Wullink <[email protected]> • #2559
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:07:42 +0200
"Marco Davids (SIDN)" <[email protected]> • #2558
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 20:52:27 +0200
Miek Gieben <[email protected]> • #2557
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:32:57 -0700
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> • #2556
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:57:39 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2555
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:09:36 -0300
Rubens Kuhl <[email protected]> • #2554
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:05:36 -0700
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> • #2553
Re: [Regops] draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:26:09 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2552
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:49:01 -0400
"Michael Young" <[email protected]> • #2551
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:45:10 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2550
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:20:04 +0200
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #2549
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:18:41 -0400
"Michael Young" <[email protected]> • #2548
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:02:55 +0000
Maarten Wullink <[email protected]> • #2547
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:42:43 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2546
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:45:13 +0200
Miek Gieben <[email protected]> • #2545
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:37:00 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2544
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:28:13 +0200
Miek Gieben <[email protected]> • #2543
Re: draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:09:39 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2542
draft-wullink-restful-epp-00.txt
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:51:48 +0200
Miek Gieben <[email protected]> • #2541
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:13:12 +0800
"Linlin Zhou" <[email protected]> • #2540
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:25:33 +0000
Alexander Mayrhofer <[email protected]> • #2539
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:33:36 +0200 (CEST)
"Jan Jansen" <[email protected]> • #2538
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:25:42 +0200
Theo Kramer <[email protected]> • #2537
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - E PP extensions?
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:08:15 -0400
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #2536
Re: ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:46:54 +0200
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]> • #2535
ICANN TMCH draft specifications available - EPP extensions?
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:12:03 +0000
Alexander Mayrhofer <[email protected]> • #2534
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:56:07 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2533
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:11:07 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2532
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 19:57:17 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2531
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:24:24 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2530
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:21:18 -0400
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #2529
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:42:35 -0400
Benoit Levac <[email protected]> • #2528
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:29:16 -0400
Benoit Levac <[email protected]> • #2527
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:24:57 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2526
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:14:11 -0300
Frederico A C Neves <[email protected]> • #2525
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:45:54 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2524
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:11:52 +0200
mike <[email protected]> • #2523
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 01:49:11 -0400
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2522
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:37:31 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2521
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:45:53 +1100
Wil Tan <[email protected]> • #2520
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:42:35 -0400
Benoit Levac <[email protected]> • #2519
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:17:11 +0800
Kevin Tes <[email protected]> • #2518
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Fri, 30 Mar 2012 04:12:28 +0200
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2517
Re: IDN administrative bundling
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:05:57 -0700
Francisco Obispo <[email protected]> • #2516
IDN administrative bundling
Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:46:41 -0400
Benoit Levac <[email protected]> • #2515
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:58:48 +0100
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> • #2514
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:39:59 -0600
Howard Eland <[email protected]> • #2513
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:23:48 +0100
Peter Koch <[email protected]> • #2512
Re: clTRID element clarification
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:04:13 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2511
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 17:58:03 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2510
Re: clTRID element clarification
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 22:32:33 -0600
Theo Kramer <[email protected]> • #2509
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 21:52:38 -0300
Frederico A C Neves <[email protected]> • #2508
Re: DNSSEC operator change [Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries]
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:52:31 -0500
"Michael Young" <[email protected]> • #2507
DNSSEC operator change [Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries]
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 19:50:29 +0100
Peter Koch <[email protected]> • #2506
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:35:44 -0500
Michael Young <[email protected]> • #2505
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:17:08 -0500
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> • #2504
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:50:40 -0500
"Michael Young" <[email protected]> • #2503
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:29:55 +0000
"Gould, James" <[email protected]> • #2502
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:52:06 +0100
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #2501
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 08 Mar 2012 12:52:18 +0200
Mark Elkins <[email protected]> • #2500
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:36:00 +0100
Antoin Verschuren <[email protected]> • #2499
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:16:04 +0100
Peter Koch <[email protected]> • #2498
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 07:41:10 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2497
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 19:35:48 +1300
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #2496
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 07:02:12 +0100
Patrik Fältström <[email protected]> • #2495
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:28:15 +1300
Jay Daley <[email protected]> • #2494
Re: clTRID element clarification
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 18:07:27 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2493
Re: clTRID element clarification
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:32:37 +0000
Aaron Roberts <[email protected]> • #2492
Re: clTRID element clarification
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:11:20 -0500
Luis Muñoz <[email protected]> • #2491
Re: clTRID element clarification
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:08:22 +0000
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> • #2490
Re: clTRID element clarification
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 15:42:20 +0000
Aaron Roberts <[email protected]> • #2489
Re: Example of stupid inconsistencies between registries
Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:10:16 +1100
James Mitchell <[email protected]> • #2488
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.