gmane.linux.conectiva.apt-rpm archive

351 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

difficulties in building -cnc7 on redhat/suse/fedora
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:14:19 -0400 (EDT)
Jim Faulkner <[email protected]> • #1949
Re: Odd bug with pinning repository
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:20:38 -0500
Stephen Clouse <[email protected]> • #1948
Re: Odd bug with pinning repository
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:30:57 +0300 (EEST)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1947
Odd bug with pinning repository
Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:50:44 -0500
Stephen Clouse <[email protected]> • #1946
apt4rpm article in Linux Magazine
Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:53:30 -0400
"Minkov, Ross" <[email protected]> • #1945
Re: versioned dependencies broken?
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:42:52 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #1944
Re: versioned dependencies broken?
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:59:44 +0300 (EEST)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1943
versioned dependencies broken?
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:37:00 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #1942
Re: Problems with apt
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 19:54:25 +0200
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1941
Re: Problems with apt
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:07:27 +0300 (EEST)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1940
Re: Status of apt-move for rpm based distributions....
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:00:14 +0300 (EEST)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1939
Status of apt-move for rpm based distributions....
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 00:52:24 +0000
"Gary L. Greene Jr." <[email protected]> • #1938
Re: Problems with apt
Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:54:05 +0200
Erik Jakobsen <[email protected]> • #1937
Re: Problems with apt
Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:37:18 +0200
Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> • #1936
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:56:09 +0200
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1935
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:09:27 +0200
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1934
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:41:49 +0300
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1933
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:42:02 +0200
Erik Jakobsen <[email protected]> • #1932
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:11:46 +0200
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1931
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:40:59 +0200
Erik Jakobsen <[email protected]> • #1930
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:38:49 +0200
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1929
Re: Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:02:08 +0200
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1928
Problems with apt
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 19:40:19 +0200
Erik Jakobsen <[email protected]> • #1927
Re: Questions about the new apt
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:13:48 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #1926
Questions about the new apt
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:58:23 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1925
Re: APT-RPM 0.5.15cnc7 released!
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:37:36 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1924
Re: APT-RPM 0.5.15cnc7 released!
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 07:53:03 -0600
"Joe Morris (NTM)" <[email protected]> • #1923
Re: APT-RPM 0.5.15cnc7 released!
Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:14:40 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1922
Re: APT-RPM 0.5.15cnc7 released!
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:36:20 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1921
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:44:11 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1920
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:28:29 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1919
APT-RPM 0.5.15cnc7 released!
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:43:03 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1918
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:24:53 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1917
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:01:47 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1916
Re: Requesting new features in the APT port for RPM
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:03:50 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1915
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:31:49 +0200 (EET)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1914
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:32:12 -0300
Andre Costa <[email protected]> • #1913
Requesting new features in the APT port for RPM
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:58:49 -0500
"Gary L. Greene Jr." <[email protected]> • #1912
Re: [Fwd: Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate]
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:53:17 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1911
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:50:07 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1910
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:44:53 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1909
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:45:21 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1908
[Fwd: Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate]
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:16:03 +0200
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1907
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:56:28 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #1906
Re: 0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:38:53 +0200
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1905
0.5.15cnc7 release candidate
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:01:35 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1904
Patch: apt-get -s and "E: Conf Broken ..." errors
11 Feb 2005 20:10:36 +0100
Norbert Warmuth <[email protected]> • #1903
Re: A last release?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:55:54 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1902
Re: A last release?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:24:51 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1901
Re: A last release?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:51:25 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1900
Re: A last release?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:24:39 +0100
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1899
Re: A last release?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:44:47 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1898
Re: A last release?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:58:11 +0100
Richard Bos <[email protected]> • #1897
Re: A last release?
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:11:35 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1896
Re: Does apt work in FC3 x86_64 ?
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:52:54 +0800
Steven Shiau <[email protected]> • #1895
Re: Does apt work in FC3 x86_64 ?
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:37:02 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #1894
Does apt work in FC3 x86_64 ?
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 04:33:21 +0800
Steven Shiau <[email protected]> • #1893
A last release?
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:15:22 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #1892
apt encoding problem?
Fri, 04 Feb 2005 11:25:44 -0600
"Joe Morris (NTM)" <[email protected]> • #1891
Re: Can apt manage packages for a different distro?
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:02:50 -0200
Andre Costa <[email protected]> • #1890
SOLVED - Re: Error message in apt: Method ftp has died unexpectedly! - Tried to dequeue a fetching object
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:20:29 -0200
Miguel Angelo Rozsas <[email protected]> • #1889
Can apt manage packages for a different distro?
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 09:32:43 -0200
Andre Costa <[email protected]> • #1888
Re: Error message in apt: Method ftp has died unexpectedly! - Tried to dequeue a fetching object
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:20:07 +0100 (CET)
Marcel Ritter <[email protected]> • #1887
Re: statically linked version of genpkglist and gensrclist ?
Wed, 02 Feb 2005 11:36:10 +0800
Steven Shiau <[email protected]> • #1886
Re: statically linked version of genpkglist and gensrclist ?
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:20:04 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #1885
Re: statically linked version of genpkglist and gensrclist ?
Wed, 02 Feb 2005 11:05:44 +0800
Steven Shiau <[email protected]> • #1884
Re: statically linked version of genpkglist and gensrclist ?
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:27:42 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #1883
Re: statically linked version of genpkglist and gensrclist ?
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 21:28:52 +0800
Steven Shiau <[email protected]> • #1882
Re: statically linked version of genpkglist and gensrclist ?
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:33:54 +0100
Michael Scherer <[email protected]> • #1881
statically linked version of genpkglist and gensrclist ?
Tue, 01 Feb 2005 19:19:18 +0800
Steven Shiau <[email protected]> • #1880
Error message in apt: Method ftp has died unexpectedly! - Tried to dequeue a fetching object
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:25:28 -0200
Miguel Angelo Rozsas <[email protected]> • #1879
Re: apt-get transaction crashed, now 200+ duplicates
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:35:39 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1878
apt-get transaction crashed, now 200+ duplicates
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:33:21 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #1877
fedora core 3, ATrpms, and dist-upgrade
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:51:21 -0700
Todd Allen <[email protected]> • #1876
Re: Removing old versions
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:47:48 +0100
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1875
Re: Removing old versions
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:11:13 +0100
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1874
Re: Removing old versions
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:40:46 -0200
Andre Costa <[email protected]> • #1873
Re: Removing old versions
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:02:21 +0100
Horst Graffy <[email protected]> • #1872
Re: Removing old versions
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:35:28 -0200
Andre Costa <[email protected]> • #1871
Re: Removing old versions
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:35:49 -0600
Rex Dieter <[email protected]> • #1870
Removing old versions
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:05:27 -0200
Andre Costa <[email protected]> • #1869
Smart
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 01:35:39 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #1868
Re: A apt-0.5.15cnc6 problem in Fedora Core 2
Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:18:28 +0800
Steven Shiau <[email protected]> • #1867
Re: Smart Package Manager
Sun, 5 Dec 2004 17:31:09 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #1866
Re: Smart Package Manager
Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:54:39 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #1865
Re: Smart Package Manager
Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:48:28 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #1864
Re: Smart Package Manager
Sat, 4 Dec 2004 12:55:22 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #1863
Re: Smart Package Manager
Sat, 4 Dec 2004 13:55:37 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1862
Re: Smart Package Manager
Sat, 04 Dec 2004 17:40:14 +0200
Ville Skyttä <[email protected]> • #1861
Re: Smart Package Manager
Sat, 4 Dec 2004 12:03:52 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1860
Re: Smart Package Manager
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 16:53:36 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #1859
Re: Smart Package Manager
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 18:09:16 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1858
Re: Smart Package Manager
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:05:30 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #1857
Smart Package Manager
Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:59:10 -0200
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #1856
Re: A workaround for multilib archs ? [Re: Re: state of apt-rpm development?]
Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:10:45 +0100
Jaroslaw Polok <[email protected]> • #1855
Re: A workaround for multilib archs ? [Re: Re: state of apt-rpm development?]
Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:19:58 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #1854
Embedded apt-rpm?
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 14:55:59 -0800 (PST)
Tero Niemela <[email protected]> • #1853
Re: state of apt-rpm development?
Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:49:50 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #1852
A workaround for multilib archs ? [Re: Re: state of apt-rpm development?]
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:05:38 +0200
Jaroslaw Polok <[email protected]> • #1851
Re: state of apt-rpm development?
Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:39:22 +0300 (EEST)
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #1850
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.