gmane.network.up2date.current.devel archive

1073 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 11). Latest articles →

Re: adding directories to rpm_dirs?
13 Mar 2002 13:43:19 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #173
adding directories to rpm_dirs?
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 11:36:56 -0700 (MST)
"Brian Lalor" <[email protected]> • #172
Re: Release of 1.0
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 07:59:45 -0700
"Daniel P. Stasinski" <[email protected]> • #171
RE: Release of 1.0
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:16:19 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #170
Re: Release of 1.0
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 19:09:13 -0500
Matthew Miller <[email protected]> • #169
Re: Release of 1.0
12 Mar 2002 18:58:06 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #168
Release of 1.0
11 Mar 2002 19:30:12 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #167
RE: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:35:31 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #166
RE: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:33:21 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #165
RE: 1.0 delayed
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 15:14:03 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #164
1.0 delayed
08 Mar 2002 15:00:48 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #163
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
08 Mar 2002 14:58:17 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #162
Re: Current-server digest, Vol 1 #48 - 8 msgs
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 13:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Frank Swasey <[email protected]> • #161
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 12:53:29 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #160
RE: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:53:54 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #159
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:51:36 -0500 (EST)
Vincent Cojot <[email protected]> • #158
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:45:11 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #157
RE: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:41:52 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #156
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:25:52 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #155
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
08 Mar 2002 10:58:04 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #154
RE: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:30:27 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #153
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:06:48 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #152
RE: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:43:16 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #151
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:35:59 -0500 (EST)
Vincent Cojot <[email protected]> • #150
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:24:28 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #149
RE: 0.99 vs redhat
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:51:01 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #148
Re: 0.99 vs redhat
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 17:09:11 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #147
0.99 vs redhat
Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:58:51 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #146
Re: my $.02 - ignore at will
01 Mar 2002 16:43:50 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #145
Re: my $.02 - ignore at will
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:35:52 -0500
"Brian K. Jones" <[email protected]> • #144
Re: my $.02 - ignore at will
Fri, 1 Mar 2002 15:24:42 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #143
RE: my $.02 - ignore at will
01 Mar 2002 15:00:46 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #142
RE: my $.02 - ignore at will
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 21:27:16 -0500
Rob Hagopian <[email protected]> • #141
Re: Current 0.99 testing
28 Feb 2002 19:16:24 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #140
Current 0.99 testing
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:46:53 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #139
Re: my $.02 - ignore at will
28 Feb 2002 17:55:17 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #138
Re: my $.02 - ignore at will
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:44:25 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #137
my $.02 - ignore at will
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:35:25 -0500
"Brian K. Jones" <[email protected]> • #136
Re: ugh. newbie.
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:37:53 -0500
"Brian K. Jones" <[email protected]> • #135
Re: ugh. newbie.
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:27:52 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #134
0.99.0 released
27 Feb 2002 17:16:06 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #133
ugh. newbie.
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:19:01 -0500
"Brian K. Jones" <[email protected]> • #132
New snapshot available
19 Feb 2002 17:09:30 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #131
Re: 2 Problems down... 1 to go...
18 Feb 2002 12:53:21 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #130
[Wrong Subject] Re: 2 Problems down... 1 to go...
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 10:33:30 -0500
"Michael H. Warfield" <[email protected]> • #129
2 Problems down... 1 to go...
Sun, 17 Feb 2002 10:30:56 -0500
"Michael H. Warfield" <[email protected]> • #128
Re: 0.9.5 annoucement
Sat, 16 Feb 2002 00:33:52 -0500
"Michael H. Warfield" <[email protected]> • #127
fresh snapshot, fresh sql patch, new irc channel
15 Feb 2002 13:42:28 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #126
Re: 0.9.5 annoucement
15 Feb 2002 13:18:34 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #125
Re: Quick about Current
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:15:45 -0500 (EST)
James Nolie Hughes <[email protected]> • #124
Re: Quick about Current
14 Feb 2002 12:05:16 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #123
Re: Quick about Current
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:59:38 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #122
Re: Quick about Current
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:46:46 -0500 (EST)
James Nolie Hughes <[email protected]> • #121
Re: Quick about Current
14 Feb 2002 10:52:29 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #120
Re: Quick about Current
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:07:44 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #119
Re: 0.9.5 annoucement
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:05:43 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #118
Re: 0.9.5 annoucement
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:44:01 +0100
Joe Ammann <[email protected]> • #117
Quick about Current
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 02:30:31 -0500 (EST)
James Nolie Hughes <[email protected]> • #116
Re: 0.9.5 annoucement
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:25:33 -0500
"Michael H. Warfield" <[email protected]> • #115
0.9.5 annoucement
13 Feb 2002 15:43:36 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #114
Re: SQL Patch Version 2
12 Feb 2002 13:07:34 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #113
Re: RFC: Timeline/Roadmap
12 Feb 2002 11:19:55 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #112
RFC: Timeline/Roadmap
12 Feb 2002 11:02:05 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #111
Re: Database Selection...
12 Feb 2002 10:37:19 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #110
Re: Database Selection...
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:51:53 +1100
Matt Bottrell <[email protected]> • #109
Re: Database Selection...
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:47:30 +1100
Matt Bottrell <[email protected]> • #108
Re: Can Current handle multiple RPMs of the same package?
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:47:53 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #107
Re: Database Selection...
11 Feb 2002 20:37:38 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #106
Re: Database Selection...
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:24:30 -0800 (PST)
Thornton Prime <[email protected]> • #105
SQL Patch Version 2
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:20:05 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #104
Re: Database Selection...
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:59:35 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #103
Re: Database Selection...
11 Feb 2002 18:58:22 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #102
Re: Database Selection...
11 Feb 2002 17:38:12 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #101
Re: Database Selection...
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Thornton Prime <[email protected]> • #100
Database Selection...
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:07:47 +1100
Matt Bottrell <[email protected]> • #99
Re: Can Current handle multiple RPMs of the same package?
11 Feb 2002 16:24:22 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #98
Re: Can Current handle multiple RPMs of the same package?
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:03:47 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #97
Can Current handle multiple RPMs of the same package?
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:59:13 -0800
"Villalovos, John L" <[email protected]> • #96
Re: docs/PostgreSQL-Backend.txt
11 Feb 2002 13:31:55 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #95
docs/PostgreSQL-Backend.txt
Fri, 8 Feb 2002 20:36:34 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #94
(no subject)
Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:40:34 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #93
Re: up2date -u gives a an error in up2date.solveDependencies
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 23:02:26 +0100
Joe Ammann <[email protected]> • #92
Re: up2date -u gives a an error in up2date.solveDependencies
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:53:49 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #91
Re: up2date -u gives a an error in up2date.solveDependencies
06 Feb 2002 16:31:52 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #90
Re: up2date -u gives a an error in up2date.solveDependencies
Wed, 06 Feb 2002 22:29:05 +0100
Joe Ammann <[email protected]> • #89
Re: SQL Backend Works
06 Feb 2002 16:13:46 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #88
Re: up2date -u gives a an error in up2date.solveDependencies
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 15:32:26 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #87
up2date -u gives a an error in up2date.solveDependencies
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 18:21:45 +0100
Joe Ammann <[email protected]> • #86
SQL Backend Works
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:27:38 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #85
RE: Invalid Arguement?
Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:51:01 -0500
"Toby D. Reeves" <[email protected]> • #84
Re: Where to get the current release?
05 Feb 2002 17:39:50 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #83
RE: Invalid Arguement?
05 Feb 2002 17:39:06 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #82
Re: Where to get the current release?
Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:41:51 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #81
Where to get the current release?
Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:51:55 -0600
[email protected] • #80
RE: Invalid Arguement?
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:24:02 +1100
Matt Bottrell <[email protected]> • #79
Re: Invalid Argument?
05 Feb 2002 12:09:16 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #78
Re: Status of up2date -u (update)
05 Feb 2002 12:01:51 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #77
Re: Invalid Argument?
05 Feb 2002 11:59:18 -0500
Hunter Matthews <[email protected]> • #76
Re: Bad cron file installed by current-client RPM
Mon, 4 Feb 2002 17:44:51 -0500
John Berninger <[email protected]> • #75
Bad cron file installed by current-client RPM
Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:20:47 -0800
"Villalovos, John L" <[email protected]> • #74
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.