gmane.comp.xfree86.forum archive
2860 archived articles, newest first (page 21 of 29). Latest articles →
Re: bloatware
Sun, 30 Mar 2003 02:03:01 +0000Re: bloatware
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:09:49 -0500Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:31:59 -0800SDK only drivers
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 18:22:26 -0500 (EST)Re: bloatware
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 16:57:35 -0500 (EST)Re: bloatware
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 23:49:13 +0300Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:46:03 -0500RE: XFree86 support for ATI M4 graphics cards
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 15:35:34 ESTRe: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 23:15:21 +0300Re: Help Me! I'm sinking...
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 14:49:36 -0500Help Me! I'm sinking...
Sun, 30 Mar 2003 00:07:15 +0530How about running X on top of something else?
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 19:28:04 +0100 (MET)About our effort at NoMachine
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:12:19 +0100Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 10:32:38 -0500Re: bloatware
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 07:55:28 -0500 (EST)OpenGL and Vector (was:Re: FW: XFree86 future)
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:11:31 +0000Re: cooperation with ISO
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 10:52:08 +0100Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 03:35:28 -0500 (EST)300 Modelos de Cartas comerciais, avisos, convites, propostas, etc.
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 04:26:16 -0400Re: bloatware
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 03:21:17 -0500 (EST)Re: X without Window-Manager?
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 03:14:08 -0500 (EST)Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:00:31 +0100Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 02:36:24 -0500 (EST)Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 02:34:38 -0500 (EST)Re: individually funded development
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 02:30:57 -0500 (EST)Re: individually funded development
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 02:24:52 -0500 (EST)Re: cooperation with ISO
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:16:08 -0500 (EST)Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:01:59 -0500 (EST)RE: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:42:30 -0500 (EST)Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 05:20:08 +0100Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 05:02:27 +0100STSF 0.4 Release Announcement
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 20:08:38 -0800About our effort at NoMachine
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 02:48:29 +0100Re: Re: [XFree86] Call for Beta Testers - SciTech SNAP Graphics for Linux!
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 00:42:23 +0000Re: [XFree86] Call for Beta Testers - SciTech SNAP Graphics for Linux!
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:52:52 -0800Suggestion for XFree86
Sat, 29 Mar 2003 09:50:45 +1100Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:58:49 -0500Re: The whole GGI/KGI spat
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:00:55 -0500 (EST)Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:48:19 -0800Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:24:05 -0500 (EST)Re: FW: XFree86 future
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 21:19:27 +0100Re: We're not ignoring you...
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:18:56 -0500 (EST)Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:16:05 -0500 (EST)Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:09:11 -0500Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:39:46 -0800 (PST)We're not ignoring you...
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:31:43 -0500Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:08:32 -0800Re: FW: XFree86 future
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:35:05 +0000Re: FW: XFree86 future
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:08:35 +0100FW: XFree86 future
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:09:57 +0100Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 07:49:17 -0500 (EST)Re: Re: lack of XFree information as a LOTD stopper
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:02:56 +0100Re: A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 03:38:07 -0500 (EST)A strawman proposal for X.org & XFree86.org
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 23:06:17 -0800Re: Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion about the future of X
27 Mar 2003 22:13:31 -0800Re: Re: lack of XFree information as a LOTD stopper
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 01:23:32 +0000Re: cooperation with ISO
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 19:59:28 -0500 (EST)Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
28 Mar 2003 01:14:07 +0100Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
28 Mar 2003 00:53:24 +0100Re: (huge tangent away from) the removal of Packard
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:49:06 -0500 (EST)Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:27:44 -0500Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:03:41 -0500Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:46:52 -0800Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:42:36 -0500 (EST)Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:29:06 -0800Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:04:29 -0800Re: The whole GGI/KGI spat
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:04:29 -0800Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:04:29 -0800Re: XFree86 and GGI
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:04:29 -0800Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:58:39 -0500 (EST)Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:50:05 -0800Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:16:56 +0000bloatware
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:26:21 +0000Re: cooperation with ISO
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:31:28 -0800 (PST)Re: cooperation with ISO
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:17:13 -0800Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:56:54 -0800 (PST)Re: cooperation with ISO
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:54:12 -0800 (PST)Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:47:58 -0500 (EST)The whole GGI/KGI spat
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:41:22 -0500 (EST)Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:23:39 -0800 (PST)Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:57:54 -0500 (EST)Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:45:37 +0100Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:10:26 +0100Re: X without Window-Manager?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 07:10:59 -0700Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:13:29 -0500 (EST)Re: cooperation with ISO
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:29:28 +0100Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:23:45 +0100Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:45:46 +0000Re: About our effort at NoMachine
27 Mar 2003 11:10:16 +0000Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:09:57 +0100Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:09:05 -0500 (EST)Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:07:06 -0500 (EST)Re: cooperation with ISO
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:54:25 +0100How about running X on top of something else?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:28:45 +0100Re: X without Window-Manager?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:29:22 +0100X without Window-Manager?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:24:18 +0100Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:21:57 +0100Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:14:50 +0100Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 10:07:31 +0100Re: Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:54:21 -0500
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.