gmane.games.devel.windows archive

367 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

Release build confusion
Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:24:43 +0200
Chris Raine <[email protected]> • #1012
RE: Terminating a program
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:34:35 -0400
"George Geczy" <[email protected]> • #1011
Re: Terminating a program
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:01:17 -0700
brian sharon <[email protected]> • #1010
Re: Terminating a program
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:11:03 +0200 (CEST)
Emmanuel Astier <[email protected]> • #1009
RE: Terminating a program
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:27:25 +0300
"Root, Konstantin" <[email protected]> • #1008
Re: Terminating a program
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:01:50 +0300
[email protected] • #1007
Re: Terminating a program
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:25:27 -0700
brian sharon <[email protected]> • #1006
Re: Terminating a program
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:01:59 +0300
[email protected] • #1005
Re: Terminating a program
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:41:51 +0200
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #1004
Re: Terminating a program
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:15:24 -0700
brian sharon <[email protected]> • #1003
Terminating a program
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:47:43 +0300
[email protected] • #1002
Re: MAX Crashes During Batch
Sat, 28 May 2005 12:28:49 +0700
"yogiwp" <[email protected]> • #1001
Re: MAX Crashes During Batch
Sat, 28 May 2005 13:55:15 +1000
Martin Slater <[email protected]> • #1000
Re: MAX Crashes During Batch
Sat, 28 May 2005 09:01:18 +0700
"yogiwp" <[email protected]> • #999
Re: MAX Crashes During Batch
Fri, 27 May 2005 17:54:32 -0700
Jon Watte <[email protected]> • #998
MAX Crashes During Batch
Sat, 28 May 2005 07:27:07 +0700
"yogiwp" <[email protected]> • #997
RE: Makefile woes
Wed, 11 May 2005 08:39:11 -0700
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #996
Re: Makefile woes
Wed, 11 May 2005 13:58:31 +1000
Martin Slater <[email protected]> • #995
Re: Makefile woes
Wed, 11 May 2005 13:40:51 +1000
Daniel Glastonbury <[email protected]> • #994
RE: Makefile woes
Tue, 10 May 2005 20:31:36 -0700
"Michael J. Lyons (SPACES)" <[email protected]> • #993
Makefile woes
Wed, 11 May 2005 10:54:50 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #992
Re: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 01:51:54 +0700
"yogiwp" <[email protected]> • #991
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:15:35 -0700
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #990
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:02:21 -0700
"Lewin, Gareth" <[email protected]> • #989
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:11:43 -0700
"Lewin, Gareth" <[email protected]> • #988
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:02:57 -0700
"Mat Noguchi (BUNGIE)" <[email protected]> • #987
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:35:40 -0700
"Grills, Jeff" <[email protected]> • #986
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:17:21 -0700
"Grills, Jeff" <[email protected]> • #985
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:05:33 -0700
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #984
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:59:06 -0400
Kent Quirk <[email protected]> • #983
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:24:03 -0700
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #982
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:05:12 +0100
"Simon O'Connor" <[email protected]> • #981
RE: VC.NET 'Optimization'
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:42:45 -0400
"Ken Noland" <[email protected]> • #980
VC.NET 'Optimization'
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:47:14 +0700
"yogiwp" <[email protected]> • #979
post
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:38:41 +0200
Michal Augustýn <[email protected]> • #978
RE: distcc/ccache with MSVC
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:30:47 -0000
"Dr Andrew Perella" <[email protected]> • #977
Re: distcc/ccache with MSVC
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:06:20 -0000
"Alen Ladavac" <[email protected]> • #976
RE: distcc/ccache with MSVC
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:56:05 -0000
"Dr Andrew Perella" <[email protected]> • #975
Re: distcc/ccache with MSVC
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:31:25 -0000
"Alen Ladavac" <[email protected]> • #974
distcc/ccache with MSVC
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:09:22 -0000
"Alen Ladavac" <[email protected]> • #973
Re: Updates in a modal dialog loop
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:47:58 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #972
Updates in a modal dialog loop
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:23:58 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #971
Re: Call stack
Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:16:06 -0800
Dan Thompson <[email protected]> • #970
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:52:32 -0800
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #969
Re: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:24:21 -0800
brian sharon <[email protected]> • #968
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:23:08 -0800
"Mat Noguchi (BUNGIE)" <[email protected]> • #967
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:10:55 -0800
"Grills, Jeff" <[email protected]> • #966
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:49:44 -0500
"Daniel Vogel" <[email protected]> • #965
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:34:35 -0800
"Mat Noguchi (BUNGIE)" <[email protected]> • #964
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:47:51 -0800
"Grills, Jeff" <[email protected]> • #963
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:24:25 -0800
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #962
Re: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:02:29 -0000
"Alen Ladavac" <[email protected]> • #961
RE: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:13:10 -0000
"Diogo de Andrade" <[email protected]> • #960
Re: Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 05:57:59 -0800 (PST)
Simon O'Connor <[email protected]> • #959
Call stack
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:43:16 -0000
"Diogo de Andrade" <[email protected]> • #958
RE: STL Containers and __declspec(export/import)
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:29:48 -0800
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #957
RE: STL Containers and __declspec(export/import)
Mon, 07 Feb 2005 01:28:23 +0100
Vasco Lohrenscheit <[email protected]> • #956
RE: STL Containers and __declspec(export/import)
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 16:47:09 -0700
"Bryan Wagstaff" <[email protected]> • #955
STL Containers and __declspec(export/import)
Sun, 06 Feb 2005 23:26:08 +0100
Chris Raine <[email protected]> • #954
How to use the interface DWebBrowserEvents2 only in Win32 ?
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:47:15 +0100
Fabien Huré <[email protected]> • #953
RE: mutiple cameras
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:10:02 -0000
Andrew Grant <[email protected]> • #952
mutiple cameras
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 08:12:11 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #951
Re: ActiveX Control question
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:31:43 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #950
Re: ActiveX Control question
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:11:05 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #949
Re: ActiveX Control question
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:01:43 +0200
Ivan-Assen Ivanov <[email protected]> • #948
Re: ActiveX Control question
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:11:40 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #947
RE: ActiveX Control question
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:09:20 -0800
"Alastair Patrick" <[email protected]> • #946
Re: ActiveX Control question
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:01:54 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #945
RE: ActiveX Control question
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:28:42 +0200
"Ivan-Assen Ivanov" <[email protected]> • #944
ActiveX Control question
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:55:15 -0500
Brian Hook <[email protected]> • #943
Re: useful VS.NET plugins
Sun, 09 Jan 2005 14:23:46 -0600
Chris Stark <[email protected]> • #942
useful VS.NET plugins
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:27:12 -0500
"Daniel Vogel" <[email protected]> • #941
Re: declspec?
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:39:24 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #940
RE: declspec?
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:15:40 -0500
"Daniel Vogel" <[email protected]> • #939
Re: declspec?
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:00:57 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #938
Re: declspec?
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:37:54 +0100
"Alen Ladavac" <[email protected]> • #937
declspec?
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:24:38 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #936
Re: Press F12 to crash...
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:29:20 +0000
Richard Fabian <[email protected]> • #935
RE: Press F12 to crash...
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:46:44 -0800
"Andy Glaister" <[email protected]> • #934
RE: Press F12 to crash...
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:02:34 -0800
"Mat Noguchi (BUNGIE)" <[email protected]> • #933
RE: Press F12 to crash...
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:57:53 +0100
Timur Davidenko <[email protected]> • #932
Press F12 to crash...
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:20:06 +0000
Richard Fabian <[email protected]> • #931
Re: How to detect that an internet connection is alive ?
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 13:30:29 +0200
Ivan-Assen Ivanov <[email protected]> • #930
Re: How to detect that an internet connection is alive ?
Thu, 23 Dec 2004 07:37:49 +0100
"Fabien" <[email protected]> • #929
Re: How to detect that an internet connection is alive ?
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 16:00:01 -0800
Mick West <[email protected]> • #928
Re: How to detect that an internet connection is alive ?
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:44:22 -0800
Mike Wuetherick <[email protected]> • #927
How to detect that an internet connection is alive ?
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:01:15 +0100
"Fabien" <[email protected]> • #926
RE: variadic macros
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:13:16 +0200
"Ivan-Assen Ivanov" <[email protected]> • #925
RE: variadic macros
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:40:00 -0800
"Paul Bleisch" <[email protected]> • #924
Re: variadic macros
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:42:10 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #923
RE: variadic macros
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:46:58 -0800
"Paul Bleisch" <[email protected]> • #922
variadic macros
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:55:09 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #921
Re: using typedef to create aligned types
Fri, 10 Dec 2004 09:00:40 +1000
Daniel Glastonbury <[email protected]> • #920
Re: using typedef to create aligned types
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:28:32 +0100
"Javier Arevalo" <[email protected]> • #919
RE: memory alignment vs passing by value
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:07:47 -0800
"Jon Watte" <[email protected]> • #918
Re: using typedef to create aligned types
Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:42:48 +1000
Daniel Glastonbury <[email protected]> • #917
Re: using typedef to create aligned types
Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:12:49 +1000
Daniel Glastonbury <[email protected]> • #916
Re: memory alignment vs passing by value
Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:13:03 +1000
Daniel Glastonbury <[email protected]> • #915
Re: memory alignment vs passing by value
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 17:02:05 -0800
Dan Thompson <[email protected]> • #914
Re: using typedef to create aligned types
Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:52:41 +0800
"Brett Bibby" <[email protected]> • #913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.