gmane.ietf.krb-wg archive

357 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals-14
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:43:58 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8676
Re: AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals-14
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:15:57 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8675
Protocol Action: 'Kerberos Options for DHCPv6' to Proposed Standard (draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-18.txt)
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:40:06 -0700
The IESG <[email protected]> • #8674
Re: I-D Action: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-18.txt
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:43:23 +0100
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> • #8673
Re: I-D Action: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-18.txt
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:43:28 +0100
t.p. <[email protected]> • #8672
I-D Action: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-18.txt
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:29:23 -0700
[email protected] • #8671
Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals-14.txt> (Kerberos Principal Name Canonicalization and KDC-Generated Cross-Realm Referrals) to Proposed Standard
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:20:28 -0700
The IESG <[email protected]> • #8670
AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals-14
Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:46:42 +0100
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> • #8669
Re: ipr in draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:13:00 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8668
Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-01.txt> (Camellia Encryption for Kerberos 5) to Informational RFC
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 11:15:22 -0700
The IESG <[email protected]> • #8667
Re: IPR Disclosure: Stephen Farrell's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-01 belonging to Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Company and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:46:01 +0100
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> • #8666
IPR Disclosure: Stephen Farrell's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-01 belonging to Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Company and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:39:08 -0700
IETF Secretariat <[email protected]> • #8665
Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-perez-krb-wg-gss-preauth-02.txt
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:40:47 +0100
Alejandro Perez Mendez <[email protected]> • #8664
Re: AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:04:32 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8663
Re: AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:42:55 +0100
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> • #8662
Re: AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts
Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:24:14 -0400
Greg Hudson <[email protected]> • #8661
AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts
Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:00:44 +0100
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> • #8660
Re: Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-pkinit-alg-agility-06
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:42:05 -0400
Greg Hudson <[email protected]> • #8659
Re: Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-pkinit-alg-agility-06
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:28:40 -0400
Greg Hudson <[email protected]> • #8658
Re: Review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-pkinit-alg-agility-06
Tue, 04 Sep 2012 20:22:34 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8657
Fwd: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-14: (with COMMENT)
Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:08:17 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8656
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:13:41 -0700
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> • #8655
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:10:26 -0700
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> • #8654
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:35:32 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8653
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:07:04 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8652
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Wed, 22 Aug 2012 02:56:15 +0200 (CEST)
[email protected] (Martin Rex) • #8651
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:22:39 -0700
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> • #8650
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:09:58 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8649
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:55:26 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8648
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:57:09 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8647
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:17:57 -0400
Tom Yu <[email protected]> • #8646
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:08:21 -0700
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> • #8645
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:49:03 -0700
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> • #8644
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:40:08 -0400
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> • #8643
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:33:23 -0400
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> • #8642
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:28:13 -0400
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> • #8641
Re: The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:49:01 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8640
Re: Usability of Renewable Tickets
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 14:44:57 -0400
Greg Hudson <[email protected]> • #8639
Usability of Renewable Tickets
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:32:57 -0400
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> • #8638
The usability of service ticket lifetimes
Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:21:18 -0400
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> • #8637
Agenda Items for ietf 85
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:37:47 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8636
I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-14.txt
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:15:18 -0700
[email protected] • #8635
Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:45:12 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8634
Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:26:05 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8633
Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:13:09 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8632
Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:10:46 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8631
Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:39:53 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8630
Re: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:55:12 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8629
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and OIDs
Tue, 31 Jul 2012 04:49:00 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8628
Re: WG Consensus: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and atomicity
Mon, 30 Jul 2012 04:48:46 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8627
I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-13.txt
Sun, 29 Jul 2012 19:47:28 -0700
[email protected] • #8626
I-D Action: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-17.txt
Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:26:06 -0700
[email protected] • #8625
I-D Action: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-16.txt
Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:26:09 -0700
[email protected] • #8624
I-D Action: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option-15.txt
Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:15:00 -0700
[email protected] • #8623
Re: WG Consensus: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and atomicity
Sat, 07 Jul 2012 00:20:30 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8622
Re: WG Consensus: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and atomicity
Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:49:42 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8621
Re: WG Consensus: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and atomicity
Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:02:50 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8620
Re: WG Consensus: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and atomicity
Thu, 5 Jul 2012 22:00:04 +0100
Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> • #8619
WG Consensus: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model and atomicity
Thu, 05 Jul 2012 16:07:17 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8618
[Fwd: Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-12]
Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:24:52 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8617
[Alexey Melnikov] Secdir review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-12
Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:34:42 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8616
BCP 179, RFC 6649 on Deprecate DES, RC4-HMAC-EXP, and Other Weak Cryptographic Algorithms in Kerberos
Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
[email protected] • #8615
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:44:15 -0400
Simo Sorce <[email protected]> • #8614
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:47:49 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8613
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:19:36 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8612
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:22:12 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8611
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:01:30 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8610
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:33:03 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8609
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:35:09 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8608
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:01:33 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8607
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:44:16 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8606
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:18:21 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8605
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:09:07 -0400
Tom Yu <[email protected]> • #8604
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:06:01 -0400
Greg Hudson <[email protected]> • #8603
Re: Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:11:46 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8602
Question: Prefer to block on draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:52:51 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8601
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:27:38 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8600
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:42:11 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8599
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 18:31:42 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8598
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:54:57 -0700
"Henry B. Hotz" <[email protected]> • #8597
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:21:49 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8596
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:12:55 -0400
Greg Hudson <[email protected]> • #8595
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:34:27 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8594
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:32:20 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8593
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:15:59 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8592
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:51:30 -0400
Greg Hudson <[email protected]> • #8591
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:16:50 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8590
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 06:57:03 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8589
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:59:34 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8588
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:57:56 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8587
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:48:13 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8586
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:39:48 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8585
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:21:04 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8584
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:48:40 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8583
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:41:06 -0400
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]> • #8582
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:35:41 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8581
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:25:52 -0400
Sam Hartman <[email protected]> • #8580
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:52:51 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8579
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:42:32 -0500
Nico Williams <[email protected]> • #8578
Re: KDC model and atomicity
Sun, 24 Jun 2012 09:41:23 +0200
Leif Johansson <[email protected]> • #8577
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.