gmane.network.djbdns archive

1349 archived articles, newest first (page 10 of 14). Latest articles →

Re: MERGEQUERIES consumes 100% CPU ?
Tue, 19 May 2009 23:12:14 -0400
Jeff King <[email protected]> • #14080
Re: MERGEQUERIES consumes 100% CPU ?
Tue, 19 May 2009 23:10:43 -0400
Jeff King <[email protected]> • #14079
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Tue, 19 May 2009 22:58:11 -0400
Jeff King <[email protected]> • #14078
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Tue, 19 May 2009 18:47:24 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14077
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Tue, 19 May 2009 19:45:48 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14076
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Tue, 19 May 2009 17:41:13 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14075
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Tue, 19 May 2009 19:19:22 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14074
Re: data.tmp: file too big [SOLVED]
Tue, 19 May 2009 22:49:27 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14073
Re: data.tmp: file too big [SOLVED]
Tue, 19 May 2009 15:42:18 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14072
Re: data.tmp: file too big [SOLVED]
Tue, 19 May 2009 15:31:39 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14071
Re: MERGEQUERIES consumes 100% CPU ?
Tue, 19 May 2009 12:46:37 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14070
Re: data.tmp: file too big [DEFINITELY SOLVED]
Tue, 19 May 2009 17:05:52 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14069
Re: MERGEQUERIES consumes 100% CPU ?
Tue, 19 May 2009 17:24:10 +0200
Jakob Hirsch <[email protected]> • #14068
Re: MERGEQUERIES consumes 100% CPU ?
Tue, 19 May 2009 15:25:55 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #14067
Re: data.tmp: file too big [SOLVED]
Tue, 19 May 2009 11:22:46 +0200
Jakob Hirsch <[email protected]> • #14066
Re: data.tmp: file too big [SOLVED]
Tue, 19 May 2009 08:29:14 +0200
Harm van Tilborg <[email protected]> • #14065
Re: data.tmp: file too big [SOLVED]
Tue, 19 May 2009 00:45:26 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14064
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Mon, 18 May 2009 17:13:09 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14063
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Mon, 18 May 2009 17:08:06 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14062
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
18 May 2009 22:28:32 +0100
"Andrew Richards" <[email protected]> • #14061
Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?
Mon, 18 May 2009 14:45:55 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14060
Re: data.tmp: file too big
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:13:20 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14059
Re: data.tmp: file too big
Mon, 18 May 2009 14:13:52 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14058
djbdns: Current recommended patches?
18 May 2009 19:34:07 +0100
"Andrew Richards" <[email protected]> • #14057
Re: data.tmp: file too big
Mon, 18 May 2009 19:20:32 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14056
data.tmp: file too big
Mon, 18 May 2009 19:14:56 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14055
MERGEQUERIES consumes 100% CPU ?
Sun, 17 May 2009 10:04:15 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #14054
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Thu, 14 May 2009 13:36:32 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14053
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Thu, 14 May 2009 13:55:23 -0400
Jeff King <[email protected]> • #14052
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Thu, 14 May 2009 12:20:52 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14051
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Thu, 14 May 2009 12:09:56 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14050
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Thu, 14 May 2009 00:45:50 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14049
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 13 May 2009 16:26:40 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14048
Re: Moving name servers
Tue, 12 May 2009 14:41:24 -0400
DAve <[email protected]> • #14047
Re: Moving name servers
Wed, 13 May 2009 00:25:57 +0900
Bernd Plagge <[email protected]> • #14046
Re: Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 16:53:02 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14045
Re: Moving name servers
Tue, 12 May 2009 00:55:04 -0400
Scott Gifford <[email protected]> • #14044
Re: Moving name servers
Tue, 12 May 2009 08:53:14 -0400
DAve <[email protected]> • #14043
Re: [Zinq-general] Caching SERVFAIL?
Mon, 11 May 2009 17:47:29 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14042
Re: [Zinq-general] Caching SERVFAIL?
Mon, 11 May 2009 19:39:07 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14041
Re: Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 16:16:12 -0400
DAve <[email protected]> • #14040
Re: Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 15:33:39 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14039
Re: Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 15:34:02 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #14038
Re: Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 15:10:22 -0400
DAve <[email protected]> • #14037
Re: Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 12:37:00 -0400
DAve <[email protected]> • #14036
Re: Moving name servers
11 May 2009 18:05:32 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #14035
Re: Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 11:51:20 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #14034
Moving name servers
Mon, 11 May 2009 10:32:21 -0400
DAve <[email protected]> • #14033
Re: [Zinq-general] Caching SERVFAIL?
Sun, 10 May 2009 11:47:03 +1200
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #14032
Re: Caching SERVFAIL?
Fri, 8 May 2009 13:43:24 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14031
Re: Caching SERVFAIL?
Fri, 08 May 2009 20:03:22 +0200
Peter Dambier <[email protected]> • #14030
Re: djbdns-1.05-ignoreip2.patch
Fri, 1 May 2009 16:56:11 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14029
Re: djbdns-1.05-ignoreip2.patch
Fri, 1 May 2009 05:05:52 +0100
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14028
Re: djbdns-1.05-ignoreip2.patch
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:01:46 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14027
Re: djbdns-1.05-ignoreip2.patch
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:16:40 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14026
djbdns-1.05-ignoreip2.patch
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:30:35 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14025
Re: CNAME related queries...
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:20:08 -0600
Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14024
Re: can someone tell me what there service directories have in them
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 12:24:16 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #14023
Re: can someone tell me what there service directories have in them
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:40:15 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14022
can someone tell me what there service directories have in them
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:51:27 -0400
Craig Sparks <[email protected]> • #14021
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:21:58 +0200
Krzysztof Gajdemski <[email protected]> • #14020
Re: CNAME related queries...
24 Apr 2009 13:31:33 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #14019
Re: CNAME related queries...
24 Apr 2009 13:30:27 -0000
John Levine <[email protected]> • #14018
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:15:09 -0400
Jeff King <[email protected]> • #14017
RE: CNAME related queries...
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:58:31 +0530
"Shinoj V Gangadharan" <[email protected]> • #14016
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:13:18 +0200
Krzysztof Gajdemski <[email protected]> • #14015
Re: CNAME related queries...
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:44:55 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14014
CNAME related queries...
Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:15:58 +0530
"Shinoj V Gangadharan" <[email protected]> • #14013
djbdns contract work
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:48:13 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14012
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:57:14 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14011
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:48:00 +0200
Krzysztof Gajdemski <[email protected]> • #14010
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:00:43 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14009
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:52:36 +0200
Harm van Tilborg <[email protected]> • #14008
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:20:11 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14007
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:31:01 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14006
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:28:03 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14005
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:41:17 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14004
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:54:05 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14003
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:56:56 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #14002
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:38:16 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14001
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:10:41 -0400
Jeff King <[email protected]> • #14000
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:07:22 -0400
Jeff King <[email protected]> • #13999
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:18:41 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #13998
zinq-djbdns-0.06...
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:02:24 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #13997
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:16:17 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #13996
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:38:56 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #13995
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:53:37 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #13994
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:25:28 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #13993
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 02:07:45 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #13992
Re: can anybody review my patchset?
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:51:31 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #13991
can anybody review my patchset?
Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:29:55 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #13990
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:39:52 +0200
Andreas Schulze <[email protected]> • #13989
Re: server sending syn to port 53
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:27:27 -0500
Oscar Ricardo Silva <[email protected]> • #13988
Re: server sending syn to port 53
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:08:27 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #13987
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:13:53 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #13986
Re: server sending syn to port 53
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:40:43 -0500
Oscar Ricardo Silva <[email protected]> • #13985
Re: server sending syn to port 53
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:40:13 -0400
Alex Pennace <[email protected]> • #13984
Re: server sending syn to port 53
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:36:08 -0700
Michael Sierchio <[email protected]> • #13983
server sending syn to port 53
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:23:50 -0500
Oscar Ricardo Silva <[email protected]> • #13982
Re: [PATCH] dnscache: merge similar outgoing udp packets
Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:26:40 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #13981
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.