gmane.comp.djb.package archive

410 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 5). Latest articles →

registration request
Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:52:35 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #311
Re: compile-time configuration, etc.
Mon, 03 Nov 2003 11:49:25 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #310
more used commands
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 12:43:48 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #308
registration request
Tue, 28 Oct 2003 18:10:52 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #307
Re: Registration Request Redux
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:21:36 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #306
Re: Registration Request Redux
22 Oct 2003 19:59:25 +0200
Frank Tegtmeyer <[email protected]> • #305
Registration Request Redux
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 05:34:03 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #304
Package registration request
Mon, 6 Oct 2003 07:49:42 -0400 (EDT)
[email protected] • #303
registration request
Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:05:41 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #302
registration request
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:21:55 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #301
more used commands
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:02:15 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #300
Re: Conversion to /package
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:56:17 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #299
Re: Conversion to /package
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 03:29:11 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #298
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:48:38 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #297
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:17:12 -0700
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #296
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:17:01 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #295
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:12:57 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #294
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:01:51 -0700
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #293
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 17:02:10 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #292
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:34:14 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #291
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:53:28 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #290
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:27:53 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #289
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:42:04 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #288
Re: Conversion to /package
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:24:39 -0700
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #287
Re: Conversion to /package
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:31:28 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #286
Re: Conversion to /package
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:50:46 +0200
Thomas Schwinge <[email protected]> • #285
Re: Problems installing daemontools on Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike)
Fri, 05 Sep 2003 17:19:06 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #284
Problems installing daemontools on Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike)
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:00:08 -0400
"Thomas A." <[email protected]> • #283
Re: skalibs-0.32
4 Sep 2003 15:10:43 +0200
"Clemens Fischer" <[email protected]> • #282
Re: Conversion to /package
Tue, 19 Aug 2003 00:05:51 +0200
Joan Picanyol <[email protected]> • #281
Re: Conversion to /package
Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:59:34 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #280
Conversion to /package
Sun, 17 Aug 2003 15:39:52 -0500
Andy Goth <[email protected]> • #279
registration request
Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:44:38 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #278
Re: registration request
14 Aug 2003 21:30:48 +0200
"Clemens Fischer" <[email protected]> • #277
registration request
Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:43:58 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #276
Re: registration request
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:48:33 +0200
Lukas Beeler <[email protected]> • #275
Re: registration request
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:20:12 -0500
[email protected] • #274
registration request
Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:26:00 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #273
registration request
Tue, 5 Aug 2003 23:12:52 +0200
Gerrit Pape <[email protected]> • #272
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:38:18 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #271
more used commands
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:35:35 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #270
Re: registration request
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:34:45 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #269
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:39:15 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #268
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:52:37 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #267
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:48:15 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #266
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:26:14 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #265
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:27:14 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #264
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:50:53 -0400
"Nicholas E. Walker" <[email protected]> • #263
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
29 Jul 2003 15:39:55 +0200
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]> • #262
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Tue, 29 Jul 2003 03:13:55 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #261
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 17:48:34 +0200
"Uffe Jakobsen" <[email protected]> • #260
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:28:30 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #259
Re: execline-1.05 non-root installation problem
Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:55:34 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #258
Re: registration request
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:06:53 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #257
Re: registration request
24 Jul 2003 08:13:31 +0200
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]> • #256
Re: registration request
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:56:45 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #255
Re: registration request
23 Jul 2003 17:52:06 +0200
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]> • #254
Re: registration request
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:30:13 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #253
Re: registration request
22 Jul 2003 20:27:46 +0200
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]> • #252
registration request
Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:22:26 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #251
Re: Registration of misc/mosquitotools
Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:47:23 +0000
Uwe Ohse <[email protected]> • #250
Re: Registration of misc/mosquitotools
17 Jul 2003 14:27:22 +0200
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]> • #249
Re: Registration of misc/mosquitotools
Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:14:09 +0000
Uwe Ohse <[email protected]> • #248
more used commands
Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:21:06 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #247
Re: /shared questions
28 Jun 2003 22:24:34 -0000
"D. J. Bernstein" <[email protected]> • #246
Re: djblinux/djbos/"D. J. Bix"
Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:24:10 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #245
Re: djblinux?
Sat, 28 Jun 2003 15:05:33 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #244
/shared questions
Sat, 28 Jun 2003 12:49:31 -0400
"Nicholas E. Walker" <[email protected]> • #243
Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:59:58 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #242
Re: djblinux/djbos/"D. J. Bix"
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:56:59 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #241
Re: atomic renames on freebsd w/ softupdates, was Re: djblinux?
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:46:18 -0700
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #240
Re: atomic renames on freebsd w/ softupdates, was Re: djblinux?
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:45:23 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #239
Re: atomic renames on freebsd w/ softupdates, was Re: djblinux?
Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:28:12 -0700
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #238
Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 16:25:16 -0500
[email protected] • #237
Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:44:58 -0500
[email protected] • #236
Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:31:50 -0500
[email protected] • #235
Re: atomic renames on freebsd w/ softupdates, was Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 12:23:34 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #234
atomic renames on freebsd w/ softupdates, was Re: djblinux?
26 Jun 2003 10:55:48 +0200
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]> • #233
Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:22:53 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #232
Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:01:02 +0200
Felix von Leitner <[email protected]> • #231
Re: djblinux/djbos/"D. J. Bix"
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 01:18:06 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #230
Re: djblinux?
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:37:52 -0700
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #229
Re: djblinux?
Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:38:22 +0200
Felix von Leitner <[email protected]> • #228
Re: djblinux?
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:05:15 -0700
Dan Kegel <[email protected]> • #227
Re: djblinux/djbos/"D. J. Bix"
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:57:43 -0500
[email protected] • #226
Re: djblinux?
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 18:00:42 -0400
marrandy <[email protected]> • #225
Re: djblinux?
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:46:03 -0500
[email protected] • #224
Re: djblinux?
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 13:24:13 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #223
Re: djblinux?
Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:09:33 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #222
Re: djblinux/djbos/"D. J. Bix"
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:07:19 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #221
Re: djblinux/djbos/"D. J. Bix"
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:12:11 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #220
OT: emacs site-lisp subdirs
25 Jun 2003 12:45:24 +0200
"clemens fischer" <[email protected]> • #219
Re: djblinux?
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 15:45:08 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #218
Re: djblinux?
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:25:31 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #217
Re: [OT] Scripts, packages, etc.
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 00:29:32 +0200
Stefan Karrmann <[email protected]> • #216
Re: djblinux?
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:49:59 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #215
djbos.
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 22:01:15 +1000
Russell Davies <[email protected]> • #214
Re: djblinux?
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:11:32 +0200
Felix von Leitner <[email protected]> • #213
Re: djblinux?
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:42:13 -0400
marrandy <[email protected]> • #212
Re: please don't add incompatibilities
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 19:10:45 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #211
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.