gmane.mail.imap.general archive
380 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →
Re: [Imap-protocol] An announcement
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:22:42 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:30:23 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:39:00 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:24:45 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:27:02 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:00:06 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:36:41 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] An announcement
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:18:07 +0000Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:34:32 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 01:39:32 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:41:17 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:23:48 -0700[Imap-protocol] An announcement
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:33:42 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:22:40 +1300Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:53:45 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:17:24 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:29:19 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 08:05:52 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:37:38 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:54:39 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP toda y how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:40:28 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:40:33 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:29:50 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:14:27 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP toda y how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:40:23 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:06:19 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:55:30 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 21:35:53 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 05:25:12 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:55:45 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 02:24:36 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 18:19:50 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:15:49 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:22:25 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:25:42 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:15:12 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:01:16 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:54:38 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:44:00 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 15:59:19 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 21:24:34 +0000Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 22:19:35 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 14:17:43 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:05:30 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 08:35:29 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:27:41 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 09:13:04 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sun, 8 Mar 2015 11:34:58 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 22:56:09 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 21:50:32 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 15:12:58 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:37:18 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 20:30:52 +0000Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 13:25:45 -0600Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:06:23 -0600Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:36:36 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 7 Mar 2015 18:34:39 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 09:13:58 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 7 Mar 2015 17:40:26 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:10:19 -0600Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:26:48 +0200Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 7 Mar 2015 15:23:26 +0200Re: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 7 Mar 2015 14:18:24 +0100[Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would it be different?
Sat, 07 Mar 2015 06:14:12 -0600[Imap-protocol] XOAUTH for Gmail IMAP and SMTP to stop working soon
Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:07:59 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] Use of namespace in LIST command
Fri, 06 Feb 2015 15:43:24 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] Use of namespace in LIST command
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:19:16 -0800 (PST)Re: [Imap-protocol] Use of namespace in LIST command
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:56:17 -0800 (PST)Re: [Imap-protocol] Use of namespace in LIST command
Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:27:22 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] Use of namespace in LIST command
Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:21:48 +0000[Imap-protocol] Use of namespace in LIST command
Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:21:07 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] Zimbra and FETCH response
Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:19:17 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] Zimbra and FETCH response
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:48:00 -0600Re: [Imap-protocol] Zimbra and FETCH response
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:29:04 -0600Re: [Imap-protocol] Zimbra and FETCH response
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:25:54 -0600Re: [Imap-protocol] Zimbra and FETCH response
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:23:17 -0800[Imap-protocol] Zimbra and FETCH response
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:52:10 -0600Re: [Imap-protocol] Condstore, Gmail and mod_seq
Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:56:59 -0800Re: [Imap-protocol] Condstore, Gmail and mod_seq
Mon, 05 Jan 2015 19:37:52 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] Condstore, Gmail and mod_seq
Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:48:28 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] Condstore, Gmail and mod_seq
Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:17:53 +0100[Imap-protocol] Condstore, Gmail and mod_seq
Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:47:47 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] GMail and Content-Type: text/x-patch, Content-Disposition: inline; filename=blah.patch
Wed, 3 Dec 2014 14:10:35 -0800[Imap-protocol] GMail and Content-Type: text/x-p atch, Content-Disposition: inline; filename =blah.patch
Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:31:29 +0100Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Fri, 17 Oct 2014 07:27:31 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Fri, 17 Oct 2014 14:50:15 +0200Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Thu, 9 Oct 2014 08:01:14 +0200Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 09:16:08 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:07:18 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Thu, 09 Oct 2014 07:57:25 +1100Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:37:30 -0700[Imap-protocol] Gmail IMAP responses are sporadically missing fields
Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:07:17 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] Gmail and IDLE flags changes
Tue, 7 Oct 2014 13:28:31 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:18:00 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 09:09:58 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
Fri, 26 Sep 2014 07:38:49 -0500Re: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:47:12 +0200Re: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:57:36 -0700Re: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
Wed, 17 Sep 2014 12:23:56 +0200Re: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
Fri, 12 Sep 2014 01:02:35 +0200
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.