gmane.network.djbdns archive

1349 archived articles, newest first (page 4 of 14). Latest articles →

Re: While we're at it
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:16:18 -0700
Colm MacCárthaigh <[email protected]> • #14686
Re: While we're at it
Fri, 2 Apr 2010 07:47:46 -0500
Simon Casady <[email protected]> • #14685
Re: While we're at it
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:41:30 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14684
Re: alloc.c
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:21:25 +0200
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14683
Re: While we're at it
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:52:20 -0700
Colm MacCárthaigh <[email protected]> • #14682
Re: ANY queries to tinydns
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:10:18 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14681
Re: alloc.c
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 12:10:27 +0100
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14680
Re: alloc.c
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:17:09 -0600
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14679
Re: alloc.c
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:19:40 -0600
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14678
Re: While we're at it
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:04:00 -0700
Colm MacCárthaigh <[email protected]> • #14677
Re: While we're at it
Thu, 1 Apr 2010 00:35:53 +0200
Alejandro Mery <[email protected]> • #14676
Re: While we're at it
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:41:49 -0500
Paul Procacci <[email protected]> • #14675
Re: While we're at it
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:41:13 -0700
Colm MacCárthaigh <[email protected]> • #14674
Re: While we're at it
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:40:44 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14673
While we're at it
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:27:19 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14672
Re: ANY queries to tinydns
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14671
Re: ANY queries to tinydns
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:26:44 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14670
Re: ANY queries to tinydns
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:46:57 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14669
Re: alloc.c
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:39:06 +0100
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14668
Re: alloc.c
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:35:47 +0100
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14667
Re: alloc.c
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:03:56 -0400
Brian <[email protected]> • #14666
Re: alloc.c
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:45:06 +0100
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14665
Re: ANY queries to tinydns
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:54:42 -0400
Brian <[email protected]> • #14664
Re: ANY queries to tinydns
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 09:54:00 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14663
ANY queries to tinydns
Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:32:46 -0400
David Hubbard <[email protected]> • #14662
alloc.c
Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:17:53 -0600
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14661
Re: okay already
Sat, 27 Mar 2010 14:52:58 +0800
Christopher Chan <[email protected]> • #14660
Re: okay already
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:12:44 +0100
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14659
Re: okay already
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:32:48 +0800
Christopher Chan <[email protected]> • #14658
Re: okay already
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 07:32:14 +0100
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14657
Re: okay already
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:16:43 +0800
Christopher Chan <[email protected]> • #14656
Re: okay already
Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:58:44 +1300
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #14655
Re: okay already
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:49:02 -0400
Vincent Labrecque <[email protected]> • #14654
Re: okay already
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:13:17 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14653
Re: okay already
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:27:22 +0100
Sebastian Andersson <[email protected]> • #14652
Re: okay already
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:59:38 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14651
Re: okay already
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:37:11 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14650
Re: okay already
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:04:42 -0600
Michael Loftis <[email protected]> • #14649
Re: okay already
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:30 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14648
Re: okay already
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:24:09 -0600
Michael Loftis <[email protected]> • #14647
Re: okay already
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:10:07 +0000
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14646
Re: okay already
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:48:57 +0000
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14645
Re: okay already
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:19:35 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14644
Re: okay already
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:07:09 +0800
Christopher Chan <[email protected]> • #14643
Re: okay already
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:13:48 -0600
Michael Loftis <[email protected]> • #14642
Re: okay already
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:44:57 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14641
Re: okay already
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14640
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:30:11 +0100
Jurjen Oskam <[email protected]> • #14639
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:05:49 +1030
Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14638
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:50:15 +0100
Jurjen Oskam <[email protected]> • #14637
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:53:30 +0100
Jurjen Oskam <[email protected]> • #14636
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:22:09 +1030
Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14635
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:38:59 -0600
Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14634
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:13:10 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14633
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:00:52 -0600
Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14632
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:55:40 -0600
Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14631
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:39:22 -0600
Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #14630
Re: Facebook
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:41:14 -0400
Joe Baptista <[email protected]> • #14629
Re: Facebook
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:37:24 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14628
Re: Facebook
Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:20:22 +0000
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14627
Re: Facebook
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:03:23 -0300
Dan Peterson <[email protected]> • #14626
Re: okay already
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:02:16 +0800
Christopher Chan <[email protected]> • #14625
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:13:59 -0400
Bri <[email protected]> • #14624
Re: okay already
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:44:31 +1300
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #14623
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:59:05 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14622
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:23:15 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14621
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:19:35 +0100
Erwin Hoffmann <[email protected]> • #14620
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:22:12 +0000
Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> • #14619
Re: okay already
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:18:14 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14618
Re: okay already
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:09:10 -0400
Joe Baptista <[email protected]> • #14617
okay already
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:01:33 -0700
Paul Theodoropoulos <[email protected]> • #14616
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:45:42 -0500
Paul Procacci <[email protected]> • #14615
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:28:11 +0200
Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> • #14614
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:21:09 +0100
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14613
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:05:37 +0100
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14612
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:51:51 +0100
Erwin Hoffmann <[email protected]> • #14611
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:02:13 +0000
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14610
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:22:47 +0000
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14609
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:19:46 +0000
Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]> • #14608
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:49:50 +1300
Jason Haar <[email protected]> • #14607
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:34:32 +0100
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]> • #14606
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:56:16 -0500
Mark Johnson <[email protected]> • #14605
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:40:30 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14604
Re: posible bug in daemontools
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:21:45 +0000
Chris Pugh <[email protected]> • #14603
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:47:50 -0700
Maciej Żenczykowski <[email protected]> • #14602
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:13:12 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14601
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:34:06 -0700
Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> • #14600
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14599
"cache-smashing attack" may be another suitable place for the goop nozzle
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:14:52 -0500
David Nicol <[email protected]> • #14598
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:15:50 +1030
Daryl Tester <[email protected]> • #14597
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:28:44 +0000
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14596
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:00:15 -0000
"George Barwood" <[email protected]> • #14595
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:16:55 -0700
Maciej Żenczykowski <[email protected]> • #14594
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:31:26 +0000
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14593
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:20:16 -0700
Maciej Żenczykowski <[email protected]> • #14592
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:14:17 +0000
Hugo Monteiro <[email protected]> • #14591
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:18:24 -0700
Maciej Żenczykowski <[email protected]> • #14590
Re: Dishonest Forks? | Was - Re: [Namedroppers-honest] Brian Smith asks: ?Who is Dean Anderson?
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:03:19 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14589
Re: squirting spray foam into the crack at the bottom of the BAW
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:40:04 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14588
Re: Quick Poll: Would you trust system software from an anonymous source?
Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
Dean Anderson <[email protected]> • #14587
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.