gmane.comp.lib.libtai archive

356 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:18:10 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #272
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:02:28 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #271
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:46:32 -0400
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #270
crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:30:46 -0400 (EDT)
"Lloyd Zusman" <[email protected]> • #269
Re: crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:43:42 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #268
crond, hwclock, and clockspeed
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #267
Updated leapsecs.dat
Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:47:49 -0400
Alex Pennace <[email protected]> • #266
clockspeed success story
Fri, 6 May 2005 15:52:13 +0200
Luca Morettoni <[email protected]> • #265
Re: Selecting logs based on time range in TAI
Mon, 02 May 2005 10:47:57 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #264
Selecting logs based on time range in TAI
Mon, 2 May 2005 05:04:22 +0000
Casey Allen Shobe - SeattleServer Mailing Lists <[email protected]> • #263
Re: ntpdate and sntpclock/clockview disagree
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:48:12 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #262
ntpdate and sntpclock/clockview disagree
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:21:02 -0600 (CST)
brian <[email protected]> • #261
Re: clockspeed and system time
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:06:24 +0100
Luca Morettoni <[email protected]> • #260
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:10:45 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #259
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:56:20 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #258
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:17:12 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #257
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:04:15 +0100
Malte Tancred <[email protected]> • #256
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:09:41 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #255
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 10:42:56 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #254
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:47:51 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #253
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:37:45 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #252
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 12:15:31 +0100
Malte Tancred <[email protected]> • #251
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:51:30 +0100
Malte Tancred <[email protected]> • #250
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 02:47:08 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #249
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 01:37:51 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #248
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:01:19 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #247
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 23:16:04 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #246
Re: Is 'right' wrong?
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:36:06 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #245
Re: Is 'right' wrong? (was: clockspeed and system time)
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 11:30:38 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #244
Re: clockspeed and system time
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:23:51 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #243
Is 'right' wrong? (was: clockspeed and system time)
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:56:01 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #242
Re: clockspeed and system time
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:38:43 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #241
Re: clockspeed and system time
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 05:32:17 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #240
Re: clockspeed and system time
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:38:19 +0100
[email protected] • #239
Re: clockspeed and system time
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:26:18 +0100
Luca Morettoni <[email protected]> • #238
Re: clockspeed and system time
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:26:24 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #237
Re: clockspeed and system time
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:17:54 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #236
Re: clockspeed and system time
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:45:15 +0000 (UTC)
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> • #235
clockspeed and system time
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:30:34 +0100
Luca Morettoni <[email protected]> • #234
Re: What is a normal value of ~/etc/atto
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:15:23 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #233
What is a normal value of ~/etc/atto
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:37:22 -0800
derik DeVecchio <[email protected]> • #232
Re: sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:11:54 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #231
Re: sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out
Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:47:48 -0600
"Andrew A. Raines" <[email protected]> • #230
sntpclock: warning: unable to read clock: timed out
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 18:09:05 -0800
derik DeVecchio <[email protected]> • #229
Re: Servers that deliver TAI?
Mon, 01 Nov 2004 05:02:13 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #228
Re: Servers that deliver TAI?
Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:09:52 -0500
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #227
Servers that deliver TAI?
Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:34:30 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #226
Re: OpenBSD 3.5 and clockspeed
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:09:22 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #225
OpenBSD 3.5 and clockspeed
Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:47:30 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)
Ed Vazquez <[email protected]> • #224
Brute force clockspeed patch
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:36:31 +0000
Uwe Ohse <[email protected]> • #223
Re: clockspeed issues on NetBSD/sparc64
Thu, 27 May 2004 10:20:17 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #222
clockspeed issues on NetBSD/sparc64
Thu, 27 May 2004 09:36:55 -0400
Sean Davis <[email protected]> • #221
RE: clockspeed on amd64 problems
Tue, 11 May 2004 15:48:51 -0700
Ethan Erchinger <[email protected]> • #220
clockspeed on amd64 problems
Tue, 11 May 2004 16:17:37 -0600
Vincent Danen <[email protected]> • #219
taiclockd address bind patch?
Sat, 8 May 2004 11:35:14 -0700
Adam Morley <[email protected]> • #218
Re: Clockspeed failing
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:53:06 +0000
rich <[email protected]> • #217
Re: Clockspeed failing
Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:48:55 -0400
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #216
Clockspeed failing
Sat, 17 Apr 2004 15:11:54 +0100
rich <[email protected]> • #215
Re: clockspeed and laptop/powersave cpu's
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:06:22 -0500
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #214
Re: clockspeed and laptop/powersave cpu's
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:38:38 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #213
clockspeed and laptop/powersave cpu's
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:23:50 +0000 (UTC)
Sven <[email protected]> • #212
Re: Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:14:33 -0600
"Andrew A. Raines" <[email protected]> • #211
Re: Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:08:31 -0500
Lang Martin <[email protected]> • #210
Re: Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:12:10 -0600
"Andrew A. Raines" <[email protected]> • #209
Re: Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:56:31 -0500
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #208
Re: Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:52:27 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #207
Re: Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:46:30 -0600
"Andrew A. Raines" <[email protected]> • #206
Re: Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 11:06:12 -0500
[email protected] (Paul Jarc) • #205
Is the Optiplex hwclock junk?
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 09:27:14 -0600
"Andrew A. Raines" <[email protected]> • #204
Re: clockspeed problem under FreeBSD 4.0
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:16:45 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #203
clockspeed problem under FreeBSD 4.0
Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:54:31 -0500
Lloyd Zusman <[email protected]> • #202
Re: Strange clock reset on boot
24 Nov 2003 13:28:42 -0500
"Toby Betts" <[email protected]> • #201
RE: Strange clock reset on boot
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:16:30 -0700
Ed Vazquez <[email protected]> • #200
RE: Strange clock reset on boot
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:31:08 -0800
Ethan Erchinger <[email protected]> • #199
Strange clock reset on boot
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:58:28 -0700
Ed Vazquez <[email protected]> • #198
Re: keeping the clock syncronised for clients
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:04:49 -0400
Toby Betts <[email protected]> • #196
keeping the clock syncronised for clients
Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:11:13 +0530
Payal Rathod <[email protected]> • #195
re: pytai announcement
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:08:06 -0400
"Michael T. Babcock" <[email protected]> • #194
Re: Question about caldate_mjd()
16 Sep 2003 09:46:02 -0000
Tim Goodwin <[email protected]> • #193
Re: Question about caldate_mjd()
Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:41:53 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #192
Re: Question about caldate_mjd()
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:40:02 -0400
Bart Grantham <[email protected]> • #191
Question about caldate_mjd()
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:25:45 -0400
Bart Grantham <[email protected]> • #190
Re: NTP and TAIClock??
Tue, 01 Jul 2003 22:48:39 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #189
Re: NTP and TAIClock??
Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:36:18 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)
Ed Vazquez <[email protected]> • #188
Re: NTP and TAIClock??
Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:42:47 -0400
Bennett Todd <[email protected]> • #187
Re: NTP and TAIClock??
Tue, 01 Jul 2003 18:35:15 -0400
John Peacock <[email protected]> • #186
NTP and TAIClock??
Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:55:20 -0600 (Mountain Daylight Time)
Ed Vazquez <[email protected]> • #185
Re: clockspeed adjustments
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:57:50 -0400
Bennett Todd <[email protected]> • #184
Re: clockspeed adjustments
Mon, 2 Jun 2003 09:33:20 -0400
Bennett Todd <[email protected]> • #183
Re: clockspeed adjustments
Sat, 31 May 2003 18:34:57 +1000
Greg Black <[email protected]> • #182
clockspeed adjustments
Sat, 31 May 2003 05:32:41 +0000
Payal Rathod <[email protected]> • #181
Accept Credit Cards Payment NOW!!!!
Sun, 4 May 2003 18:41:15 -0700
[email protected] • #180
The Future of Leapseconds
Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:28:59 +0200
Malte Tancred <[email protected]> • #178
Re: Suggested clockspeed/taiclockd invocation at boot
Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:42:06 +0200
Patrick Atamaniuk <[email protected]> • #177
Re: Problem: clockspeed on 2Ghz Athlon
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 16:07:03 -0500 (EST)
[email protected] • #176
Re: sntpclock: fatal: time uncertainty too large
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Shantanu <[email protected]> • #175
Re: NTP and clockspeed together.
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:44:26 -0700
Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #174
Re: NTP and clockspeed together.
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:37:52 +1000
Greg Black <[email protected]> • #173
NTP and clockspeed together.
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:23:47 -0700
Andy Bradford <[email protected]> • #172
Re: sntpclock: fatal: time uncertainty too large
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 23:13:57 -0600 (CST)
"Martin A. Brown" <[email protected]> • #171
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.