gmane.ietf.provreg archive
1661 archived articles, newest first (page 12 of 17). Latest articles →
Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 12:20:03 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Mon, 4 Jul 2011 12:07:24 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Sun, 03 Jul 2011 08:25:44 -0400Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:51:19 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:52:25 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:44:26 +0200Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP
Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:05:00 -0400Re: Proposal: A method in EPP for registry policy discovery
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 18:01:35 +0200Re: Another look at the data model for launch phase registrations
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:43:17 +0200Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:32:50 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:36:59 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:32:09 +0100Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:22:21 +0100Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:08:59 +0800Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:03:34 +0100Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:44:40 +0800Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:40:02 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:27:33 +0100Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 18:09:10 +1000Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:11:53 +0200Re: Proposal: A method in EPP for registry policy discovery
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:11:30 +0200Re: Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:50:22 +0200Re: Proposal: A method in EPP for registry policy discovery
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:33:45 +0100Proposal: A method in EPP for registry policy discovery
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:55:39 +0100Proposal: A standard EPP OT&E test suite for each object type and extension type
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:25:41 +0100Re: Another look at the data model for launch phase registrations
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:41:56 +0100Re: Another look at the data model for launch phase registrations
Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:45:58 +1000Another look at the data model for launch phase registrations
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:33:02 +0100An alternative to bulk access EPP extensions or IRIS
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:31:01 -0400Re: Where are the Registrars? (was Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP)
Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:59:32 +0200Re: Where are the Registrars?
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:31:24 +0000Re: Where are the Registrars? (was Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP)
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:07:59 -0400Where are the Registrars? (was Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP)
Fri, 10 Jun 2011 10:39:53 +0200 (CEST)Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 23:45:13 +0200Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:08:51 -0400Re: Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:31:51 -0700Why must there be one solution? was Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 15:53:29 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:28:41 +0000Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:23:53 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 08:31:44 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:33:12 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 19:53:31 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:42:46 -0700Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:03:49 +0000Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:42:20 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 09 Jun 2011 12:40:03 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 23:51:26 -0700Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:50:52 +0200 (CEST)Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 08:42:43 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 23:14:42 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Thu, 9 Jun 2011 06:43:47 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:42:24 -0700Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 17:40:03 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 20:14:30 +0200Re: Too much 'E'? was Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:29:22 +0000Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:17:50 +0000Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:02:09 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:49:09 -0700Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:20:58 +0200Re: Too much 'E'? was Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:32:05 +0200Too much 'E'? was Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:47:43 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:32:22 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:31:34 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 14:29:26 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:55:43 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:51:09 -0400Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 13:32:43 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:13:35 +0100Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:00:25 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:19:31 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:16:30 +0200 (CEST)Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:12:10 +0200Re: Lists and EPP
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 10:05:20 +0100Lists and EPP
Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:50:49 +0200Re: Perhaps out of scope, but valuable: IDN Codepoint
Tue, 31 May 2011 20:08:12 +0200Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 12:45:02 -0400Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 09:44:03 -0700Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 18:28:33 +0200Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 18:06:12 +0200Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 08:59:21 -0700Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 08:55:06 -0700Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 17:48:46 +0200Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 11:39:17 -0400Re: Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 11:30:20 -0400Ways of querying for linked objects...
Tue, 31 May 2011 08:20:36 -0700Re: Perhaps out of scope, but valuable: IDN Codepoint
Tue, 31 May 2011 07:23:01 -0700Re: Perhaps out of scope, but valuable: IDN Codepoint
Tue, 31 May 2011 11:53:36 +0100Perhaps out of scope, but valuable: IDN Codepoint
Fri, 27 May 2011 10:56:30 -0700Re: EPP LaunchPhase Extension: draft requirements and scope
Sun, 22 May 2011 17:16:42 -0700Re: EPP LaunchPhase Extension: draft requirements and scope
Sun, 22 May 2011 19:39:24 +0100Re: EPP LaunchPhase Extension: draft requirements and scope
Sun, 22 May 2011 18:13:53 +0100Re: EPP LaunchPhase Extension: draft requirements and scope
Sat, 21 May 2011 21:12:32 +1000Re: EPP LaunchPhase Extension: draft requirements and scope
Wed, 18 May 2011 00:09:49 +0200Re: Splitting the launch phase block in 2 parts
Wed, 11 May 2011 13:07:23 -0700Re: Splitting the launch phase block in 2 parts
Sun, 1 May 2011 03:45:10 +1000Splitting the launch phase block in 2 parts
Mon, 18 Apr 2011 21:17:21 +0200 (CEST)Re: LP naming convention
Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:46:14 +0200Re: LP naming convention
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:26:43 +1000Re: LP naming convention
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:01:46 -0400LP naming convention
Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:11:47 +1000
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.