gmane.comp.java.picocontainer.devel archive
1267 archived articles, newest first (page 5 of 13). Latest articles →
Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:18:43 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] Updated CSS for Pico Distribution
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:38:12 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] Updated CSS for Pico Distribution
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:14:49 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Updated CSS for Pico Distribution
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:02:21 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] New logos ?
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:54:04 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] New Picocontainer-web ... defeating IoC made easier now :-(
Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:53:24 +0100[picocontainer-dev] New logos ?
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:51:26 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] New Picocontainer-web ... defeating IoC made easier now :-(
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:03:02 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] New Picocontainer-web ... defeating IoC made easier now :-(
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:31:17 -0700[picocontainer-dev] New Picocontainer-web ... defeating IoC made easier now :-(
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:25:52 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Updated CSS for Pico Distribution
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:06:22 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] Three tiers or four for webapps
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:34:08 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:49:35 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 06:47:16 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:28:12 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:08:31 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 03:07:27 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:56:43 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:01:15 -0700[picocontainer-dev] is current build working?
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:45:56 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] Three tiers or four for webapps
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:38:45 -0700 (PDT)[picocontainer-dev] I moved the loadClass(componentName) bits of the former NanoContainer to picocontainer itself
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:30:28 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Can we delete ContainerRecorder and associated classes ....
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:54:55 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] Can we delete ContainerRecorder and associated classes ....
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:45:46 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Three tiers or four for webapps
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:26:39 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Can we delete ContainerRecorder and associated classes ....
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:23:25 -0700[picocontainer-dev] A preview of the picocontainer-web site
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:49:57 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Drop persistence-core?
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:31:32 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Drop persistence-core?
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:44:05 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] Drop persistence-core?
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:48:01 +0200[picocontainer-dev] Drop persistence-core?
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:50:54 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] Re: [picocontainer-scm] [4586] java/2.x/trunk/persistence/persistence-core: Made it possible so that persistence-core can automatically compile on either JDK 1.5/JDK1.6/JDK!.7 platforms without patches.
Sat, 7 Jun 2008 19:04:56 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] Re: [picocontainer-scm] [4586] java/2.x/trunk/persistence/persistence-core: Made it possible so that persistence-core can automatically compile on either JDK 1.5/JDK1.6/JDK!.7 platforms without patches.
Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:16:28 +0200[picocontainer-dev] Re: [picocontainer-scm] [4586] java/2.x/trunk/persistence/persistence-core: Made it possible so that persistence-core can automatically compile on either JDK 1.5/JDK1.6/JDK!.7 platforms without patches.
Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:06:52 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] SVN Cert Update?
Fri, 6 Jun 2008 08:39:37 +0200[picocontainer-dev] SVN Cert Update?
Thu, 5 Jun 2008 15:29:43 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Move nanoweb and aop to sandbox?
Fri, 30 May 2008 16:59:04 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] Site generation
Fri, 30 May 2008 06:54:12 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Site generation
Fri, 30 May 2008 14:11:02 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] RE: [picocontainer-scm] [4525] java/2.x/trunk/pico/container/src/test/org/picocontainer/defaults: constructor injection speedup : remembers (optionally) the constructor to use
Thu, 29 May 2008 20:54:43 -0700[picocontainer-dev] RE: [picocontainer-scm] [4525] java/2.x/trunk/pico/container/src/test/org/picocontainer/defaults: constructor injection speedup : remembers (optionally) the constructor to use
Thu, 29 May 2008 20:29:31 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Thu, 29 May 2008 22:12:04 +0200Re: [picocontainer-dev] ScriptedWebappComposer
Thu, 29 May 2008 13:02:32 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] ScriptedWebappComposer
Thu, 29 May 2008 19:45:09 +0000 (UTC)Re: [picocontainer-dev] ScriptedWebappComposer
Thu, 29 May 2008 04:29:16 -0700 (PDT)[picocontainer-dev] ScriptedWebappComposer
Thu, 29 May 2008 11:48:22 +0100[picocontainer-dev] Progress on picocontainer-script and -web
Wed, 28 May 2008 19:11:20 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] Struts2 help please!
Wed, 28 May 2008 12:08:00 +0000 (UTC)[picocontainer-dev] Struts2 help please!
Tue, 27 May 2008 22:41:59 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] new nanowar - checked into sandbox
Tue, 27 May 2008 06:50:17 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] new nanowar - checked into sandbox
Tue, 27 May 2008 12:11:48 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] new nanowar - checked into sandbox
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:50:27 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] new nanowar - checked into sandbox
Tue, 27 May 2008 10:47:27 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] new nanowar - checked into sandbox
Tue, 27 May 2008 02:12:09 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] new nanowar - checked into sandbox
Mon, 26 May 2008 19:14:49 -0700[picocontainer-dev] new nanowar - checked into sandbox
Mon, 26 May 2008 19:10:48 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 18:47:20 +0100Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 18:06:56 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 07:42:33 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 07:05:24 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 01:33:38 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 01:22:46 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 01:20:55 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 01:13:16 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Sun, 25 May 2008 23:46:03 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Mon, 26 May 2008 08:34:00 +0200Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Sun, 25 May 2008 19:51:59 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Sun, 25 May 2008 19:01:37 -0700[picocontainer-dev] While looking at the streamlining of NanoWar ...
Sun, 25 May 2008 18:46:16 -0700[picocontainer-dev] named containers (for debugging only)
Sun, 25 May 2008 12:59:41 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Fri, 23 May 2008 05:43:15 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Thu, 22 May 2008 23:50:46 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Current state of the NanoWeb examples..
Thu, 22 May 2008 20:46:01 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Thu, 22 May 2008 09:08:09 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Thu, 22 May 2008 07:22:15 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Thu, 22 May 2008 01:02:31 -0700[picocontainer-dev] (Re)Leaning what the old NanoWar did ..
Wed, 21 May 2008 19:48:06 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Current state of the NanoWeb examples..
Wed, 21 May 2008 16:15:07 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Wed, 21 May 2008 12:59:01 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Wed, 21 May 2008 09:03:12 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Wed, 21 May 2008 07:41:34 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Wed, 21 May 2008 06:50:14 -0700 (PDT)Re: [picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Wed, 21 May 2008 06:21:21 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] nanosar's pom.xml file is corrupt ?
Wed, 21 May 2008 14:56:21 +0200[picocontainer-dev] nanosar's pom.xml file is corrupt ?
Wed, 21 May 2008 05:36:20 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] CSS Gurus out there?
Wed, 21 May 2008 04:59:36 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] CSS Gurus out there?
Wed, 21 May 2008 12:44:13 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] CSS Gurus out there?
Wed, 21 May 2008 00:08:09 -0700RE: [picocontainer-dev] CSS Gurus out there?
Wed, 21 May 2008 08:56:57 +0200[picocontainer-dev] CSS Gurus out there?
Tue, 20 May 2008 23:53:27 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Trying an experiment to kill off ContainerRecorder (Nano)
Tue, 20 May 2008 21:45:47 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Moving towards a Nano 2.x release
Tue, 20 May 2008 07:34:25 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Moving towards a Nano 2.x release
Tue, 20 May 2008 15:27:20 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] Moving towards a Nano 2.x release
Tue, 20 May 2008 07:47:38 +0200RE: [picocontainer-dev] Pico 2.3 unreleased ...
Mon, 19 May 2008 10:51:00 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Pico 2.3 unreleased ...
Mon, 19 May 2008 07:28:47 -0700Re: [picocontainer-dev] Nanocontainer 2.0: anything I can do to help?
Mon, 19 May 2008 07:01:18 -0700[picocontainer-dev] Nanocontainer 2.0: anything I can do to help?
Mon, 19 May 2008 14:27:23 +0100[picocontainer-dev] PicoContainer Logging
Sun, 18 May 2008 15:28:18 +0100RE: [picocontainer-dev] Any objections to me pushing out a release of Pico over the weekend ?
Sat, 17 May 2008 19:50:22 -0700
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.