gmane.comp.programming.language-of-the-year archive

364 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 10:53:23 +0200
Michael Schuerig <[email protected]> • #8810
Model driven, anyone?
Mon, 30 May 2011 09:50:08 +0200
Kjell Rilbe <[email protected]> • #8809
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 03:33:33 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8808
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 09:17:31 +0200
Remco Gerlich <[email protected]> • #8807
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Mon, 30 May 2011 06:37:31 +0200
Kjell Rilbe <[email protected]> • #8806
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Sun, 29 May 2011 20:31:09 -0500
Mando Escamilla <[email protected]> • #8805
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Sun, 29 May 2011 21:25:42 -0400
Avdi Grimm <[email protected]> • #8804
RE: What's up with C++ (books)?
Sat, 28 May 2011 13:53:51 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8803
Re: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Fri, 27 May 2011 18:35:48 -0500
Brandon Carlson <[email protected]> • #8802
Re[2]: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Fri, 27 May 2011 17:08:48 -0600
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8801
Re: Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Fri, 27 May 2011 18:25:28 -0400
Chris Patti <[email protected]> • #8800
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Fri, 27 May 2011 15:46:22 -0300
Diego Sueiro <[email protected]> • #8799
Books and a balance (was: What's up with C++ (books)?)
Fri, 27 May 2011 12:32:51 -0600
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8798
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Fri, 27 May 2011 20:02:41 +0200
Michael Schuerig <[email protected]> • #8797
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Fri, 27 May 2011 19:53:17 +0200
Michael Schuerig <[email protected]> • #8796
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Fri, 27 May 2011 12:49:54 -0300
Diego Sueiro <[email protected]> • #8795
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Fri, 27 May 2011 08:26:45 -0400
Jared Richardson <[email protected]> • #8794
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Fri, 27 May 2011 12:05:53 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #8793
Re: What's up with C++ (books)? [1 Attachment]
Fri, 27 May 2011 17:13:17 +1200
Gordon Milne <[email protected]> • #8792
RE: What's up with C++ (books)?
Fri, 27 May 2011 06:02:00 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8791
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Thu, 26 May 2011 23:50:41 -0400
Chris Patti <[email protected]> • #8790
Re: What's up with C++ (books)?
Thu, 26 May 2011 20:57:00 -0500
Dave Thomas <dave-kbbdpT5sCmpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #8789
RE: What's up with C++ (books)?
Thu, 26 May 2011 16:46:56 -0600
"Craig Berntson" <[email protected]> • #8788
What's up with C++ (books)?
Thu, 26 May 2011 21:06:02 +0200
Michael Schuerig <[email protected]> • #8787
Re: (unknown)
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:06:41 -0800
Dave Thomas <dave-kbbdpT5sCmpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #8786
(unknown)
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:02:13 -0800 (PST)
sarahtuvia-/[email protected] • #8785
(unknown)
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 08:10:29 -0800 (PST)
sarahtuvia-/[email protected] • #8784
Re: The Browser Is Dead
Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:54:49 -0000
"jtigg3r" <[email protected]> • #8783
Re: The Browser Is Dead
Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:51:01 -0000
"jtigg3r" <[email protected]> • #8782
Re: The Browser Is Dead
Wed, 2 Feb 2011 08:57:03 -0200
Luiz Esmiralha <[email protected]> • #8781
Re: The Browser Is Dead
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:00:20 -0500
Andrew Semprebon <[email protected]> • #8780
Re: The Browser Is Dead
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:09:23 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8779
Re: The Browser Is Dead
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:46:41 -0600
Glenn Vanderburg <[email protected]> • #8778
The Browser Is Dead
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:13:12 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8777
Re: Re[4]: Programming is not a craft
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:53:58 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8776
Re: Re[4]: Programming is not a craft
Sun, 16 Jan 2011 00:53:37 +0100
Michele Costabile <[email protected]> • #8775
Re: Re[4]: Programming is not a craft
Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:02:33 -0600
Dave Stagner <[email protected]> • #8774
Re[4]: Programming is not a craft
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:37:14 -0700
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8773
Re: Re[2]: Programming is not a craft
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:35:59 +0100
Michele Costabile <[email protected]> • #8772
Re: Re[2]: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:50:43 +0000
Enrique Comba Riepenhausen <[email protected]> • #8771
Re[2]: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:49:10 -0700
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8770
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:28:35 -0800
Graham Hughes <[email protected]> • #8769
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Al Chou <hotfusionman-/[email protected]> • #8768
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:14:40 -0200
Luiz Esmiralha <[email protected]> • #8767
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:31:51 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8766
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:31:51 -0600
Robert Williams <[email protected]> • #8765
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:11:10 -0500
Jared Richardson <[email protected]> • #8764
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:01:06 -0600
Dave Thomas <dave-kbbdpT5sCmpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #8763
Re: Programming is not a craft
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:47:10 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8762
Re: Programming is not a craft
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:02:45 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8761
Re: Re: Programming is not a craft
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:52:43 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8760
Re: Programming is not a craft
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:16:33 -0600
James Ashley <[email protected]> • #8759
Re: Re: Programming is not a craft
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 23:14:48 -0500
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8758
Re: Re: Programming is not a craft
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:36:57 -0600
Dave Thomas <dave-kbbdpT5sCmpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> • #8757
Re: Programming is not a craft
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 21:26:06 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8756
Programming is not a craft
Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:43:49 -0600
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8755
Are you smarter than Paul the octopus?
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:42:34 -0800 (PST)
Kathleen Smyth <kathy.smyth99-/[email protected]> • #8754
Hey! Found reliable Canadian pharmacy
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 07:42:42 +0100
Trond Arve Wasskog <[email protected]> • #8753
Re: Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Garry Freemyer <garryfre-yBeKhBN/[email protected]> • #8752
Re: Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:12:35 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8751
Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Fri, 29 Oct 2010 18:03:30 +1300
John Carter <[email protected]> • #8750
Re: Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 14:47:15 -0500
James Ashley <[email protected]> • #8749
Re: Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:25:25 +0100
Johnathan Meehan <johnathan.meehan-Teh1U3IPPOKF51e+ZNOf3QC/[email protected]> • #8748
Re: Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:02:28 -0500
Paul Comeau <[email protected]> • #8747
Re: Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:08:41 -0400
Ron Jeffries <[email protected]> • #8746
Opinions please : You can't (shouldn't) fix Stupid, remove the Stupid first and then see if you still have a problem.
Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:42:18 +1300
John Carter <[email protected]> • #8745
Re: Good RESTful resources? Any PragProg books?
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:51:00 -0700
Ken Kolchier <[email protected]> • #8744
Good RESTful resources? Any PragProg books?
Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:31:04 -0500
Chris Morris <[email protected]> • #8743
Re: Agile Project Management Tools
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:24:05 +0200
Ilja Preuß <[email protected]> • #8742
Re: Agile Project Management Tools
Sun, 12 Sep 2010 10:22:21 +0200
Michele Costabile <[email protected]> • #8741
Re: Agile Project Management Tools
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:03:38 -0400
Austin Ziegler <[email protected]> • #8740
Re: Agile Project Management Tools
Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:21:40 +0200
Michele Costabile <[email protected]> • #8739
Re: Agile Project Management Tools
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:56:32 -0400
Wesley Reisz <[email protected]> • #8738
Re: Agile Project Management Tools
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:19:17 -0500
James Ashley <[email protected]> • #8737
Agile Project Management Tools
Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:33:22 -0400
Wesley Reisz <[email protected]> • #8736
Re: Software book recommendations...
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:15:46 -0400
Chris Patti <[email protected]> • #8735
Re: Software book recommendations...
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:06:27 +0100
Andy Leighton <[email protected]> • #8734
Re: PragProg Release Branch with TFS
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:46:20 -0400
Chris Patti <[email protected]> • #8733
Re: Software book recommendations...
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:39:27 -0400
Chris Patti <[email protected]> • #8732
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:00:20 +0200
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8731
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:55:23 +1300
John Carter <[email protected]> • #8730
Re: Information gathering exercise
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:52:12 +1300
Gordon Milne <[email protected]> • #8729
Re: The bigger the project the worse they are
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:28:03 -0700
Garold L Johnson <dynalt-/[email protected]> • #8728
Re: The bigger the project the worse they are
Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:50:09 +1300 (NZDT)
John Carter <[email protected]> • #8727
The bigger the project the worse they are
Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:25:51 -0000
"garystruthers" <[email protected]> • #8726
Re: The bigger the project the worse they are
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 13:38:26 -0700
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8725
Re: The bigger the project the worse they are
Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:06:26 -0000
"eravich" <eravich-/[email protected]> • #8724
Re: The bigger the project the worse they are
Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:35:45 +0100
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8723
Re[2]: Gruple contract gig
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:13:18 -0700
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8722
Re: Gruple contract gig
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:49:31 +1300
Gordon J Milne <[email protected]> • #8721
Gruple contract gig
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 01:05:43 -0700
Gregg Irwin <[email protected]> • #8720
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:38:44 +1300
Gordon Milne <[email protected]> • #8719
Check out my photos on Facebook
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:33:36 -0800
Rakesh Malik <[email protected]> • #8718
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:33:53 -0800
Rakesh Malik <[email protected]> • #8717
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:05:21 -0600
James Ashley <[email protected]> • #8716
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:02:23 +0100
"Jeroen Wenting" <[email protected]> • #8715
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:14:53 -0600
Dave Stagner <[email protected]> • #8714
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:16:41 -0500
Austin Ziegler <[email protected]> • #8713
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:40:42 +1300
Gordon Milne <[email protected]> • #8712
Re: Re: Information gathering exercise
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:15:26 -0600
James Ashley <[email protected]> • #8711
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.