gmane.comp.xfree86.forum archive

2860 archived articles, newest first (page 23 of 29). Latest articles →

Re: How about running X on top of something else?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:37:55 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #660
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:35:41 -0800
Allen Akin <[email protected]> • #659
RE: Community government, new developers, release cycle
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:33:02 -0600
"Rich Murphey" <[email protected]> • #658
Re: individually funded development
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:29:59 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #657
GGI might be the way...
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:13:06 +0100
Christoph Egger <[email protected]> • #656
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:03:10 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #655
How about running X on top of something else?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 23:31:27 +0100
Christoph Egger <[email protected]> • #654
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:34:06 -0700 (MST)
Marc Aurele La France <[email protected]> • #653
Re: Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:15:03 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #652
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:58:27 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #651
Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:29:02 +0000
Jim Howard <[email protected]> • #650
Re: Driver development vs X development
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:31:35 -0800
"Kendall Bennett" <[email protected]> • #649
RE: Community government, new developers, release cycle
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:31:35 -0800
"Kendall Bennett" <[email protected]> • #648
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:27:45 -0800
Allen Akin <[email protected]> • #647
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:25:45 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #646
Re: direct rendering and compatability
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:34:55 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #645
Re: communication
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #644
Re: Driver status information needs clarification
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:01:05 +0100
Matthieu Herrb <[email protected]> • #643
DGA replacements (was Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO)
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:59:01 -0600
Billy Biggs <[email protected]> • #642
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:38:29 -0800 (PST)
<[email protected]> • #641
Re: individually funded development
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:39:24 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #640
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:24:21 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #639
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:29:28 -0300
Solerman Kaplon <[email protected]> • #638
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
25 Mar 2003 20:10:49 +0100
Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> • #637
Re: direct rendering and compatability
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:07:24 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #636
Re: RE: communication
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:50:56 +0300
Vadim Plessky <[email protected]> • #635
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:12:52 -0800
"Bev Corwin" <[email protected]> • #634
Re: communication
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:48:59 +0300
Vadim Plessky <[email protected]> • #633
individually funded development
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:41:14 -0500
"COFFMAN Steven" <[email protected]> • #632
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:44:07 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #631
direct rendering and compatability
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 04:09:29 +0100
Gregor Burger <[email protected]> • #630
Re: XFree86 5.0 TODO
25 Mar 2003 19:34:33 +0100
Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> • #629
Re: About our effort at NoMachine
25 Mar 2003 19:38:07 +0100
Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> • #628
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:48:24 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #627
Driver status information needs clarification
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:41:13 +0300
Samium Gromoff <[email protected]> • #626
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:27:18 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #625
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:58:13 -0800
Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]> • #624
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:11:05 -0800
"Bev Corwin" <[email protected]> • #623
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:52:58 +0100
[email protected] (Lukas Molzberger) • #622
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:11:48 -0800
"Bev Corwin" <[email protected]> • #621
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:06:52 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #620
Re: Incorporation for what reason?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:05:40 +0100
Egbert Eich <[email protected]> • #619
Server side text layout (was Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...)
25 Mar 2003 10:28:55 -0500
Owen Taylor <[email protected]> • #618
Re: Suggestion for XFree86
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:26:11 +0100
Paul de Vrieze <[email protected]> • #617
Re: Re: FW: XFree86 future
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 14:25:27 +0100
[email protected] (Lukas Molzberger) • #616
Re: GGI might be the way...
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:28:22 +0100
James Arthur <[email protected]> • #615
Re: Suggestion for XFree86
25 Mar 2003 13:37:20 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #614
Re: Re: FW: XFree86 future
25 Mar 2003 12:36:10 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #613
lack of XFree information as a LOTD stopper
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:30:08 +0000
Gustavo Homem <[email protected]> • #612
Re: FW: XFree86 future
25 Mar 2003 13:29:43 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #611
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
25 Mar 2003 12:24:56 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #610
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:17:33 +0100 (CET)
Peter Karlsson <[email protected]> • #609
Re: GGI might be the way...
25 Mar 2003 13:18:11 +0100
Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> • #608
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:11:55 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #607
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:24:53 -0500
Randy Kramer <[email protected]> • #606
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:02:10 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #605
Re: XFree new feature : "remote" input
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:15:13 +0000
Jeremy Wilkins <[email protected]> • #604
Re: FW: XFree86 future
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:46:39 +0100
Paul de Vrieze <[email protected]> • #603
Re: Driver development vs X development
25 Mar 2003 10:43:30 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #602
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:18:58 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #601
Re: Re: XFree new feature : "remote" input
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:19:14 +0100
Andreas Ehliar <[email protected]> • #600
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
25 Mar 2003 09:57:06 +0000
Torgeir Veimo <[email protected]> • #599
Re: some XFree86 5.0 questions...
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:37:49 -0800
Alexander Gelfenbain <[email protected]> • #598
Re: Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 09:07:53 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #597
Re: cooperation with ISO
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:48:58 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #596
Re: cooperation with ISO
25 Mar 2003 08:21:59 +0100
rudy BERRY <[email protected]> • #595
Re: cooperation with ISO
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:20:14 +0100
Martin Konold <[email protected]> • #594
RE: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Craig Groeschel <[email protected]> • #593
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:42:29 -0800
Keith Packard <[email protected]> • #592
Re: Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 05:24:19 +0100
Gian Filippo Pinzari <[email protected]> • #591
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:29:18 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #590
Re: Some perspective from the cheap seats...
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:59:55 -0800
Allen Akin <[email protected]> • #589
Re: XFree new feature : "remote" input
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:31:19 -0800
James <[email protected]> • #588
Incorporation for what reason?
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 02:21:23 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #587
Re: cooperation with ISO
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:14:44 -0500 (EST)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #586
Re: cooperation with ISO
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:11:31 -0500 (EST)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #585
RE: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:49:49 -0500
"David Wexelblat" <[email protected]> • #584
Re: "Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:26:02 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #583
RE: communication
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:10:37 -0500
"David Wexelblat" <[email protected]> • #582
Re: About our effort at NoMachine
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 01:13:30 +0100
"Kurt Pfeifle" <[email protected]> • #581
Re: communication
25 Mar 2003 01:00:27 +0100
rudy BERRY <[email protected]> • #580
Re: communication
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:48:38 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #579
Re: protocol enhancements
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:43:27 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #578
Re: protocol enhancements
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:34:26 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #577
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:29:53 -0500 (EST)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #576
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:23:29 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #575
Re: cooperation with ISO
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:18:29 -0500 (EST)
Alan Cox <[email protected]> • #574
"Drivers? We don't need no stinking..."
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:53:10 +0000
Jim Howard <[email protected]> • #573
cooperation with ISO
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:59:47 +0100
Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> • #572
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:59:28 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #571
Re: Driver development vs X development
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 14:44:10 -0800
"Kendall Bennett" <[email protected]> • #570
Re: Invitation
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:26:49 -0500
Nicholas Wourms <[email protected]> • #569
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:21:56 -0500 (EST)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #568
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:17:17 -0500 (EST)
Mark Vojkovich <[email protected]> • #567
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:14:48 +0100
Toplica Tanaskovic <[email protected]> • #566
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:10:12 +0100
Daniel Smolik <[email protected]> • #565
XFree new feature : "remote" input
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:02:04 +0000
nicO <[email protected]> • #564
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:00:07 -0500 (EST)
Leon Shiman <[email protected]> • #563
Re: Move X definition to IETF?
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:52:33 -0500
Havoc Pennington <[email protected]> • #562
Re: A Call For Open Governance Of X Development
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:01:45 -0500
Randy Kramer <[email protected]> • #561
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.