gmane.ietf.impp archive

387 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 12:53:56 -0700
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #739
RE: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 16:50:29 +0100
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #738
Re: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 09:46:10 -0600
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #737
Re: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 09:44:17 -0600
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #736
RE: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 10:35:13 +0100
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #735
RE: "De facto charter" proposed text
Fri, 23 May 2003 11:06:05 +0530
"sivaram" <[email protected]> • #734
"De facto charter" proposed text
Thu, 22 May 2003 18:54:32 -0400
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #733
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-srv-03.txt
Wed, 21 May 2003 08:10:19 -0400
[email protected] • #732
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-pres-03.txt
Wed, 21 May 2003 08:10:31 -0400
[email protected] • #731
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-im-03.txt
Wed, 21 May 2003 08:10:24 -0400
[email protected] • #730
Re: Few questions on IMPP
Thu, 15 May 2003 09:29:45 -0500
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> • #729
Few questions on IMPP
Thu, 15 May 2003 17:11:28 +0530
"sivaram" <[email protected]> • #728
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-08.txt
Mon, 12 May 2003 10:47:32 -0400
[email protected] • #727
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-08.txt
Mon, 12 May 2003 07:23:17 -0400
[email protected] • #726
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-03.txt (faster crypto)
Wed, 11 Apr 2003 11:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Brian Korver <[email protected]> • #725
Re: other candidates for IMPP ?
Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:49:20 -0600
Ben Schumacher <[email protected]> • #724
Re: other candidates for IMPP ?
28 Mar 2003 18:40:33 -0500
[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell) • #723
[Fwd: [Simple] Call for availability: Interim meeting]
27 Mar 2003 09:20:11 -0600
Robert Sparks <[email protected]> • #722
RE: other candidates for IMPP ?
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 16:39:55 +1100
"Stephen Gryphon" <[email protected]> • #721
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-im-02.txt
Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:33:43 -0500
[email protected] • #720
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-pres-02.txt
Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:33:51 -0500
[email protected] • #719
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-srv-02.txt
Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:33:36 -0500
[email protected] • #718
Re: other candidates for IMPP ?
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:02:36 +0100
"Nicolas Deves" <[email protected]> • #717
RE: other candidates for IMPP ?
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:01:28 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #716
other candidates for IMPP ?
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:33:01 +0100
"Nicolas Deves" <[email protected]> • #715
RE: Items for agenda?
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 03:48:05 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #714
RE: Items for agenda?
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:36:02 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #713
Re: Items for agenda?
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:35:38 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #712
Items for agenda?
Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:22:20 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #711
RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:05:42 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #710
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 13:54:38 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #709
RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:42:46 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #708
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:09:36 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #707
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:14:48 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #706
RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 14:00:57 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #705
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 28 Jan 2003 11:22:52 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #704
RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12))
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:59:29 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #703
RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Sat, 25 Jan 2003 17:53:33 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #702
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Sat, 25 Jan 2003 00:28:49 -0600
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #701
RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multip le documents (deadline Jan 12))
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:24:22 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #700
draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-06.txt (was: WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12))
Fri, 24 Jan 2003 09:12:45 -0600
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #699
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
23 Jan 2003 01:02:25 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #698
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:23:03 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #697
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
22 Jan 2003 11:00:51 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #696
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
22 Jan 2003 10:55:55 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #695
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 07:21:26 -0600
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #694
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 02:23:43 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #693
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
21 Jan 2003 23:05:38 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #692
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:37:55 -0600
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #691
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
21 Jan 2003 15:38:52 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #690
RE: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:50:56 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #689
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt-08.txt
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 07:52:55 -0500
[email protected] • #688
Updated draft: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt-08.txt
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:12:47 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #687
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Sat, 18 Jan 2003 02:37:15 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #686
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
17 Jan 2003 10:48:40 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #685
Re: Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:32:48 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #684
Definition of the pres: URI in impp-pres-01
16 Jan 2003 11:50:49 -0600
Robert Sparks <[email protected]> • #683
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
16 Jan 2003 11:34:06 -0600
Robert Sparks <[email protected]> • #682
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:09:49 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #681
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:34:06 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #680
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
15 Jan 2003 14:12:18 -0600
Robert Sparks <[email protected]> • #679
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:43:49 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #678
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:40:33 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #677
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
15 Jan 2003 13:18:54 -0600
Robert Sparks <[email protected]> • #676
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:33:56 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #675
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:41:14 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #674
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:20:49 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #673
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:31:13 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #672
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:56:33 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #671
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:28:14 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #670
FW: WG last call on PIDF (deadline Jan 17)
Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:13:26 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #669
RE: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:15:33 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #668
RE: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 19:15:31 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #667
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:41:23 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #666
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:42:10 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #665
RE: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:03:12 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #664
Re: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:31:52 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #663
Re: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:41:10 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #662
RE: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Thu, 9 Jan 2003 09:48:55 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #661
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 08:57:47 -0500
Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]> • #660
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
09 Jan 2003 07:28:43 -0500
[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell) • #659
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
09 Jan 2003 06:29:48 -0500
[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell) • #658
Re: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Thu, 09 Jan 2003 10:38:30 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #657
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:08:01 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #656
Re: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:16:10 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #655
RE: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:44:35 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #654
Re: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01
08 Jan 2003 11:46:06 -0500
[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell) • #653
RE: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:48:01 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #652
Re: draft-ietf-impp-im-01
08 Jan 2003 10:22:33 -0500
[email protected] (John D. Ramsdell) • #651
FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-07.txt
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:16:31 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #650
CORRECTED WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12)
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:19:45 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #649
WG last call on PIDF (deadline Jan 17)
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:22:53 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #648
Some Querries
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:17:51 +0300
"sohel" <[email protected]> • #647
Re: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 08:01:50 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #646
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-cpim-pidf-07.txt
Tue, 07 Jan 2003 08:29:19 -0500
[email protected] • #645
RE: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 04:50:48 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #644
RE: draft-ietf-impp-srv-01.txt (was: Re: WG Last Call on multipl e documents (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 04:12:31 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #643
RE: draft-ietf-impp-pres-01 (was: WG Last Call on multiple docume nts (deadline Jan 12))
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 03:39:04 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #642
Re: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 23:09:36 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #641
RE: draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple docu ments (deadline Jan 12))
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:24:22 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #640
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.