gmane.ietf.impp archive

388 archived articles, newest first (page 3 of 4). Latest articles →

draft-ietf-impp-pres-01 (was: WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12))
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 16:55:24 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #639
draft-ietf-impp-im-01 (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12))
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:29:13 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #638
Re: draft-ietf-impp-srv-01.txt (was: Re: WG Last Call on multipl e documents (deadline Jan 12))
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:20:55 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #637
RE: draft-ietf-impp-srv-01.txt (was: Re: WG Last Call on multipl e documents (deadline Jan 12))
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:52:40 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #636
draft-ietf-impp-srv-01.txt (was: Re: WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12))
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 22:05:36 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #635
FW: WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12)
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:19:00 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #634
WG Last Call on multiple documents (deadline Jan 12)
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:15:34 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #633
RE: Attempt to summarize various threads
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 19:27:30 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #632
Re: Attempt to summarize various threads
Tue, 24 Dec 2002 00:36:16 +0900
"Hiroyasu Sugano" <[email protected]> • #631
Modelling IMPP : Please help
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:29:13 +0300
"sohel" <[email protected]> • #630
Re: Attempt to summarize various threads
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 09:32:55 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #629
Re: Attempt to summarize various threads
Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:54:11 +0900
"Hiroyasu Sugano" <[email protected]> • #628
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-im-01.txt
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 08:01:46 -0500
[email protected] • #627
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-pres-01.txt
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 08:01:51 -0500
[email protected] • #626
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-impp-srv-01.txt
Mon, 09 Dec 2002 08:01:40 -0500
[email protected] • #625
RE: Attempt to summarize various threads
Wed, 4 Dec 2002 07:09:04 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #624
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Tue, 03 Dec 2002 22:33:40 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #623
Re: Attempt to summarize various threads
Tue, 03 Dec 2002 16:19:48 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #622
Attempt to summarize various threads
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:35:40 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #621
Re: number of tuples
Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:28:52 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #620
Re: number of tuples
Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:09:05 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #619
Re: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
02 Dec 2002 10:47:03 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #618
RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:57:56 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #617
RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:50:02 +0200
<[email protected]> • #616
RE: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:45:25 +0200
<[email protected]> • #615
RE: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:41:58 +0200
<[email protected]> • #614
RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 09:39:46 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #613
RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:26:17 +0200
<[email protected]> • #612
RE: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 07:17:08 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #611
RE: Improving PIDF
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:06:25 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #610
RE: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 06:20:03 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #609
RE: number of tuples
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:24:15 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #608
RE: number of tuples
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 06:07:45 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #607
RE: number of tuples
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 06:08:05 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #606
RE: Improving PIDF
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 05:44:32 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #605
Re: number of tuples
Sun, 1 Dec 2002 13:12:18 +0200
"Avshalom Houri" <[email protected]> • #604
Re: number of tuples
Sun, 01 Dec 2002 00:11:36 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #603
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:46:23 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #602
Re: Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
Sat, 30 Nov 2002 23:21:18 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #601
RE: NAPTR and CPIM
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:32:44 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #600
RE: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:20:51 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #599
RE: number of tuples
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:00:34 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #598
Loops (was RE: Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55)
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:01:13 -0000
"Adrian Bateman" <[email protected]> • #597
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 10:49:12 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #596
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:22:45 +0000
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> • #595
RE: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:55:31 +0200
<[email protected]> • #594
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 23:39:07 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #593
Fw: I-D ACTION:draft-riikonen-presence-attrs-01.txt
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 17:06:12 +0200
"Avshalom Houri" <[email protected]> • #592
RE: number of tuples
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:35:45 +0200
<[email protected]> • #591
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 01:38:40 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #590
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:06:03 -0500
Tony Hansen <[email protected]> • #589
Tuple Priority
Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:15:37 +0800
Deepankar Biswas <[email protected]> • #588
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:49:54 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #587
Re: Improving PIDF
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:34:52 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #586
Re: number of tuples
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:41:28 +0200
"Avshalom Houri" <[email protected]> • #585
Re: Improving PIDF
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:05:25 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #584
Re: number of tuples
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:12:24 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #583
RE: number of tuples
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 03:59:45 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #582
Re: Improving PIDF
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:20:52 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #581
RE: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:13:33 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #580
RE: Improving PIDF
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:16:25 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #579
Improving PIDF
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:08:12 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #578
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:58:01 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #577
Virus detected and cleaned; was: UnloadWin()
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:16:53 -0500 (EST)
suga <[email protected]> • #576
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:27:48 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #575
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:24:03 -0700
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #574
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:34:52 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #573
number of tuples
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:51:19 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #572
Preliminary minutes, IMPP at IETF55
Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:27:15 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #571
Re: Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:41:39 -0500
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #570
Is cpim-srv document necessary at all? (Re: NAPTR and CPIM)
19 Nov 2002 08:09:55 +0200
Pekka Pessi <[email protected]> • #569
Re: NAPTR and CPIM
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:53:41 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #568
More editorial fixes for draft-ietf-impp-pres-00.txt
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:30:17 -0500
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #567
RE: NAPTR and CPIM
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:19:13 +0200
<[email protected]> • #566
Editorial fix for cpim-pidf-06
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 12:54:53 -0500
"Thanos Diacakis" <[email protected]> • #565
Small editorial fixes for draft-ietf-impp-pres-00.txt
18 Nov 2002 11:37:19 -0500
"Derek Atkins" <[email protected]> • #564
RE: Small editorial fix for draft-ietf-impp-im-00.txt
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:58:31 -0500
"Peterson, Jon" <[email protected]> • #563
Small editorial fix for draft-ietf-impp-im-00.txt
18 Nov 2002 09:52:15 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #562
Chairs say rough consensus: MSGFMT and Gatewaying
Sun, 17 Nov 2002 12:45:53 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #561
Chairs say rough consensus: MSGFMT and Gatewaying
Mon, 18 Nov 2002 01:08:08 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #560
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 13:20:00 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #559
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
16 Nov 2002 15:35:58 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #558
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 12:04:36 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #557
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
16 Nov 2002 15:00:39 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #556
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 07:39:43 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #555
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
16 Nov 2002 08:56:00 -0500
Derek Atkins <[email protected]> • #554
Re: NAPTR and CPIM
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:58:24 -0500
Jonathan Rosenberg <[email protected]> • #553
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:02:37 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #552
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:48:53 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #551
RE: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:31:18 -0600
Adam Roach <[email protected]> • #550
RE: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:03:32 -0600
Adam Roach <[email protected]> • #549
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:11:54 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #548
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt syntax
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:14:23 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #547
RE: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:28:07 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #546
RE: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:35:54 -0500
"Mark Day" <[email protected]> • #545
RE: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:28:58 -0600
Adam Roach <[email protected]> • #544
RE: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt syntax
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:49:03 -0600
Adam Roach <[email protected]> • #543
RE: NAPTR and CPIM
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:54:53 +0200
<[email protected]> • #542
Re: Loops (RE: CPIM changes)
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 19:00:53 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #541
Re: draft-ietf-impp-cpim-msgfmt syntax
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 18:59:10 -0800
Dave Crocker <[email protected]> • #540
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.