gmane.mail.spam.srs.general archive

368 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 03 Apr 2006 12:58:21 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #781
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:43:05 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #780
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 3 Apr 2006 04:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
"william(at)elan.net" <[email protected]> • #779
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:12:00 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #778
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #777
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Sun, 2 Apr 2006 20:27:21 +0200
Stephan Menzel <[email protected]> • #776
Re: Downloading a thread
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:12:20 -0800 (PST)
Doug Jolley <[email protected]> • #775
Re: Downloading a thread
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:57:10 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #774
Downloading a thread
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Doug Jolley <[email protected]> • #773
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:04:20 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #772
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:42:30 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #771
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:25:14 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #770
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:12:11 -0500
"Dick St.Peters" <[email protected]> • #769
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:11:15 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #768
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:05:47 -0500
"Dick St.Peters" <[email protected]> • #767
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:43:07 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #766
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:36:38 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #765
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:45:50 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #764
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:40:07 -0500
"Dick St.Peters" <[email protected]> • #763
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:41:24 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #762
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:32:43 -0600
"David Nicol" <[email protected]> • #761
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:23:51 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #760
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:01:51 -0600
"David Nicol" <[email protected]> • #759
Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:46:09 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #758
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 19:04:34 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #757
Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:55:25 -0500
Mark Jeftovic <[email protected]> • #756
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 13:50:55 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #755
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:48:01 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #754
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:26:27 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #753
Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:31:47 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #752
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:11:53 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #751
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:59:47 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #750
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:44:15 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #749
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:17:55 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #748
Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:55:23 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #747
Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:39:44 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #746
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:33:32 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #745
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:52:36 -0500
"John A. Martin" <[email protected]> • #744
Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:33:32 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #743
Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 04:16:54 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #742
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:31:50 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #741
Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:24:36 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #740
Re: Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:52:27 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #739
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:49:15 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #738
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:46:34 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #737
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:48:18 -0600
"David Nicol" <[email protected]> • #736
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:33:20 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #735
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:41:01 -0600
"David Nicol" <[email protected]> • #734
Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:20:49 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #733
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:19:38 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #732
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:04:47 -0500
"John A. Martin" <[email protected]> • #731
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:48:01 +0200
Stephan Menzel <[email protected]> • #730
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:13:10 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #729
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:02:19 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #728
One of those well known providers
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:57:06 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #727
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:54:28 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #726
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:38:46 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #725
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:24:46 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #724
Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:10:13 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #723
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:06:16 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #722
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #721
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:51:46 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #720
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:46:28 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #719
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:42:33 +0200
Stephan Menzel <[email protected]> • #718
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:31:33 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #717
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #716
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:00:51 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #715
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:50:21 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #714
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:17:01 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #713
SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 11:18:45 -0500
Mark Jeftovic <[email protected]> • #712
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:09:12 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #711
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:32:42 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #710
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:42:30 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #709
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:20:13 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #708
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:43:19 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #707
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:28:50 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #706
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:03:56 -0800 (PST)
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #705
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 19:03:06 -0800
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> • #704
Re: Why SRS really sucks
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:27:03 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #703
Why SRS really sucks
Mon, 27 Mar 2006 02:10:28 +0000 (UTC)
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> • #702
Re: Re: spfd vs postfix
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:02:04 -0500
"Eddy Beliveau" <[email protected]> • #700
Re: spfd vs postfix
Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:11:39 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #699
spfd vs postfix
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:25:15 -0500
"Eddy Beliveau" <[email protected]> • #698
RE: Weird problem with srs-socketmapd.0.32rc3.pl
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:48:07 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #697
RE: Weird problem with srs-socketmapd.0.32rc3.pl
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:31:46 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #696
RE: Weird problem with srs-socketmapd.0.32rc3.pl
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:55:23 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #695
Weird problem with srs-socketmapd.0.32rc3.pl
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:29:18 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #694
RE: Errors with socketmapd.0.31.pl
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:17:25 -0500
"Dick St.Peters" <[email protected]> • #693
RE: Errors with socketmapd.0.31.pl
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:54:47 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #692
RE: Errors with socketmapd.0.31.pl
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:42:17 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #691
Re: Errors with socketmapd.0.31.pl
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:28:45 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #690
Re: Errors with socketmapd.0.31.pl
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:24:16 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #689
Errors with socketmapd.0.31.pl
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:05:43 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #688
Re: Debian exim4 SRS forward only how-to
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:36:11 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #687
Re: Debian exim4 SRS forward only how-to
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:05:37 +0000
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #686
Debian exim4 SRS forward only how-to
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:55:00 +0100 (CET)
[email protected] • #685
RE: socketmapd.0.31.pl file system location
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:31:41 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #684
RE: socketmapd.0.31.pl file system location
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:44:05 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #683
socketmapd.0.31.pl file system location
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:59:51 -0700 (MST)
Robert Muchnick <[email protected]> • #682
Re: SRS whitelist
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:20:00 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #681
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.