gmane.network.gnutella.devel archive

381 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 4). Latest articles →

How to do a network-friendly search as leaf
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:22:21 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13158
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:26:49 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13157
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Pringlemeir <[email protected]> • #13156
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:22:13 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13155
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:03:16 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13154
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:27:53 +0100
Michael Rogers <[email protected]> • #13153
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:59:55 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13152
libsynk
Wed, 7 Apr 2010 08:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
Negin Mosavi <[email protected]> • #13151
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:11:51 +0100
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13150
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:17:28 -0300
Francisco <[email protected]> • #13149
Gnutella Questions (Was: Vendor packet #23)
Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:26:46 +0100
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13148
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella
Tue, 6 Apr 2010 12:07:04 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13147
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Negin Mosavi <[email protected]> • #13146
Re: Re: Vendor packet #23
Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Negin Mosavi <[email protected]> • #13145
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:42:03 -0300
"Francisco" <[email protected]> • #13144
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Pringlemeir <[email protected]> • #13143
gnutella dataset
Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:55:33 -0800 (PST)
Negin Mosavi <[email protected]> • #13142
Re: Re: Vendor packet #23
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:55:23 +0000
Michael Rogers <[email protected]> • #13141
Re: Vendor packet #23
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:54:13 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13140
Re: Re: Vendor packet #23
Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:48:52 +0300
"Nikolay Raspopov" <[email protected]> • #13139
Re: Gnutella 3
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:21:23 +0000
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13138
Re: Gnutella 3
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:56:01 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13137
Re: Gnutella 3
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:53:24 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13136
Re: Gnutella 3
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:24:10 +0000
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13135
Re: Gnutella 3
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:19:20 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13134
Re: Gnutella 3
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:07:43 +0000
Michael Rogers <[email protected]> • #13133
strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella; was: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:14:18 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13132
Re: Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella; was: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:00:50 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13131
Re: Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:03:53 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13130
Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13129
Re: Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:30:55 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13128
Re: strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella; was: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13127
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:23:52 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13126
Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:13:12 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13125
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:10:55 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13124
strengths and weaknesses of Gnutella; was: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:12:12 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13123
Re: Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:05:17 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13122
Re: Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:28:17 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13121
Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:29:58 -0500
Zlatin Balevsky <[email protected]> • #13120
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:48:24 +0100 (CET)
verdy_p <[email protected]> • #13119
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:07:46 +0100 (CET)
verdy_p <[email protected]> • #13118
Re: Gnutella 3
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:20:09 +0000
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13117
Re: Gnutella 3
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:51:02 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13116
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:34:59 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13115
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:42:17 -0300
"Francisco" <[email protected]> • #13114
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:19:19 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13113
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:52:32 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13112
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:59:40 +0100 (CET)
verdy_p <[email protected]> • #13111
Re: Gnutella 3
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:19:58 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13110
Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:45:27 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:45:28 +0100
[email protected] • #13109
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:25:56 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13108
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:23:16 +0100 (CET)
verdy_p <[email protected]> • #13107
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:37:13 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13106
Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:44:13 +0100
[email protected] • #13105
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:33:54 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13104
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:32:29 -0300
"Francisco" <[email protected]> • #13103
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:29:09 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13102
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:48:20 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13101
re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:13:16 +0100 (CET)
verdy_p <[email protected]> • #13100
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:56:22 +0000
Michael Rogers <[email protected]> • #13099
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:49:06 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13098
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:28:17 +0000
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13097
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:19:56 +0100
Max <[email protected]> • #13096
Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:55:16 +0100
[email protected] • #13095
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:55:34 +0000
Michael Rogers <[email protected]> • #13094
Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP
Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13093
Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:01:35 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13092
Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:08:17 +0100
[email protected] • #13091
Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?
Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:02 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13090
Hello,
Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:20:07 -0000
"Mr A.Boukhatemi" <[email protected]> • #13089
Some graphs produced from data from Mojito
Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:40:15 -0000
"garethdanielsmith" <[email protected]> • #13088
Tutorial
Sun, 29 Nov 2009 23:13:02 -0000
"jecdiniz" <[email protected]> • #13087
Re: Request RFC of Gnutella2
Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:41:36 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13086
Re: Request RFC of Gnutella2
Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:22:33 +0000
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13085
Request RFC of Gnutella2
Fri, 6 Nov 2009 23:35:34 -0800 (PST)
ali ashrafi <[email protected]> • #13084
Re: Re: HTTP Link header?
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:24:51 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13083
Re: HTTP Link header?
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:19:49 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13082
Re: Re: HTTP Link header?
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 12:13:29 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13081
Re: Re: HTTP Link header?
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:06:54 +0000
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13080
Re: HTTP Link header?
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:26:45 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13079
Re: Re: HTTP Link header?
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:31:43 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13078
Re: HTTP Link header?
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13077
A simple Gnutella tracker + fileserver
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:52:22 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13076
HTTP Link header?
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:19:50 +0100
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13075
Re: Frostwire protocol,,,
Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:33:35 -0400
Sam Berlin <[email protected]> • #13074
Frostwire protocol,,,
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:38:10 -0000
"wolli_68" <[email protected]> • #13073
About Peer to Peer & Manet file sharing protocol interfacing in NS2.
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:31:47 -0000
"bhosalemahesh87" <[email protected]> • #13072
About getting ORION protocol for NS2 simulations
Sat, 8 Aug 2009 02:38:50 -0700 (PDT)
Mahesh Bhosale <[email protected]> • #13071
Re: Re: Packets to big error
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:23:24 -0300
Daniel Cunha <[email protected]> • #13070
Re: Packets to big error
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:11:17 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13069
Packets to big error
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:14:12 -0300
Daniel Cunha <[email protected]> • #13068
Re: please remove kirk.homeip.net from the list of preferred gwebcache servers
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:47:45 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13067
Re: please remove kirk.homeip.net from the list of preferred gwebcache servers
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:08:40 -0400
Michael Rogers <[email protected]> • #13066
please remove kirk.homeip.net from the list of preferred gwebcache servers
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:57:01 -0000
"kirkawolff" <[email protected]> • #13065
Re: Cached Results to Reduce Server Load--Is it Acceptable?
Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:18:04 +0000 (UTC)
[email protected] • #13064
Cached Results to Reduce Server Load--Is it Acceptable?
Sun, 27 Sep 2009 03:50:57 -0000
"majortommib" <[email protected]> • #13063
Re: I'm sorry that spam got through; was: Dear Friend
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 22:25:01 +0100
Michael Green <[email protected]> • #13062
I'm sorry that spam got through; was: Dear Friend
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:01:12 +0200
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> • #13061
Dear Friend
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
PERERA GRACIELA <[email protected]> • #13060
re: Re: File downloading
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 15:19:10 +0200 (CEST)
verdy_p <[email protected]> • #13059
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.