gmane.os.openbsd.smp archive

207 archived articles, newest first (page 2 of 3). Latest articles →

Re: Use SMP on i386
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:45:42 -0500
"Timothy Donahue" <[email protected]> • #115
Use SMP on i386
Tue, 9 Dec 2003 22:16:22 +0100
rembrandt <[email protected]> • #114
Re: Status of OpenBSD/SMP
Sun, 2 Nov 2003 18:23:40 -0500
"NMilford" <[email protected]> • #113
Status of OpenBSD/SMP
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:51:22 +1100
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> • #112
Re: activity?
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 14:47:16 -0500
"Benjamin A. Collins" <[email protected]> • #109
Re: activity?
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:11:36 +0200
Henning Brauer <[email protected]> • #108
Re: activity?
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:02:19 +0100
Robert Davies <[email protected]> • #107
activity?
Sat, 12 Jul 2003 14:23:31 -0500
"Benjamin A. Collins" <[email protected]> • #106
Re: off topic IS THE LIST ALIVE???
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 14:11:07 -0400 (EDT)
"Joshua Steele" <[email protected]> • #101
Re: off topic IS THE LIST ALIVE???
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:24:32 -0700
Michael Waldstein <[email protected]> • #100
Re: off topic IS THE LIST ALIVE???
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:19:14 -0300
Fábio Olivé Leite <[email protected]> • #99
Re: off topic IS THE LIST ALIVE???
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:58:38 -0400
"Nate Kidwell" <[email protected]> • #98
off topic IS THE LIST ALIVE???
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:10:07 -0500
Manish Sharma <[email protected]> • #97
Re: spinlocks
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:00:20 -0800
Chad Loder <[email protected]> • #95
Re: spinlocks
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:43:37 -0700
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #94
Re: spinlocks
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:39:44 -0700
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #93
Re: spinlocks
26 Mar 2003 15:43:36 -0700
Chris Cameron <[email protected]> • #92
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:09:54 +0100
Marco Feenstra <[email protected]> • #91
Re: spinlocks
26 Mar 2003 11:15:14 -0700
Chris Cameron <[email protected]> • #90
Re: spinlocks
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:52:52 -0500
"Frank J. Mattia" <[email protected]> • #89
Re: spinlocks
26 Mar 2003 09:14:23 -0700
Chris Cameron <[email protected]> • #88
Re: spinlocks
Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:26:45 -0500
"Lipscomb, Al" <[email protected]> • #87
Re: spinlocks
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:18:11 -0800
"Rick Spiff" <[email protected]> • #86
Re: Status
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:04:01 +0100
Niklas Hallqvist <[email protected]> • #85
Re: Supporting 2nd Processors in Open BSD
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:05:33 +0000
Robert Davies <[email protected]> • #84
Status
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 14:37:24 +0100
Niklas Hallqvist <[email protected]> • #83
Re: just a thought
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:24:26 +0100
Paweł Napiórkowski <[email protected]> • #82
Re: just a thought
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:00:19 -0700
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #81
Re: just a thought
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:56:55 +0100
Paweł Napiórkowski <[email protected]> • #80
Re: just a thought
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 03:42:19 -0700
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #79
Re: just a thought
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:30:36 +0100
Paweł Napiórkowski <[email protected]> • #78
Re: just a thought
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 03:23:31 -0700
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #77
just a thought
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 11:18:34 +0100
Paweł Napiórkowski <[email protected]> • #76
Re: spinlocks
21 Mar 2003 11:06:19 +0100
Marc Balmer <[email protected]> • #75
Re: Supporting 2nd Processors in Open BSD
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 03:03:30 -0700
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #74
Re: spinlocks
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:57:15 -0000
Dan Argent <[email protected]> • #73
Re: spinlocks
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 10:32:13 +0100
Martin Reindl <[email protected]> • #72
Supporting 2nd Processors in Open BSD
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:42:46 +0000
Robert Davies <[email protected]> • #71
Back to work
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:44:59 +0100
Marc Balmer <[email protected]> • #70
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 21:56:14 -0500 (EST)
francisco <[email protected]> • #69
Re: spinlocks
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:34:19 +0100
"Michal Koc" <[email protected]> • #68
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:28:48 +0000
Miod Vallat <[email protected]> • #67
Re: spinlocks
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:23:30 +0100
chefren <[email protected]> • #66
Re: spinlocks
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:15:10 +0100
"Michal Koc" <[email protected]> • #65
Re: spinlocks
Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:13:30 +0100
"Michal Koc" <[email protected]> • #64
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 15:03:46 -0800
Leonard Clark <[email protected]> • #63
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:53:07 +0100
Martin Reindl <[email protected]> • #62
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:33:33 -0600
"RainBrain" <[email protected]> • #61
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:50:27 +0000
Miod Vallat <[email protected]> • #60
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:42:10 +0100
"Michal Koc" <[email protected]> • #59
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:30:26 +0000
Miod Vallat <[email protected]> • #58
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 23:22:26 +0100
"Michal Koc" <[email protected]> • #57
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 17:12:27 -0500
Joshua Steele <[email protected]> • #56
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 14:01:06 -0500
Dave Steinberg <[email protected]> • #55
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 13:38:54 -0500
bill traynor <[email protected]> • #54
Re: spinlocks (general status request)
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:30:31 +0100
Martin Reindl <[email protected]> • #53
Re: spinlocks (general status request)
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:20:04 +0100
"Max Laier" <[email protected]> • #52
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:40:38 -0600
"RainBrain" <[email protected]> • #51
Re: spinlocks
Thu, 20 Mar 2003 16:53:53 +0100
"Michal Koc" <[email protected]> • #50
Re: spinlocks
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:04:12 +0100
Martin Reindl <[email protected]> • #49
Fwd: info/help
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:54:59 -0500
alex avriette <[email protected]> • #48
Re: Activity...
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:23:14 -0500
Dave Steinberg <[email protected]> • #47
Activity...
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 12:16:37 +0100
Marc Balmer <[email protected]> • #46
Re: spinlocks
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:16:25 +0100 (CET)
Dries Schellekens <[email protected]> • #45
spinlocks
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:56:47 -0500
"Will Ellis-Adams" <[email protected]> • #44
Re: NetBSD SMP
09 Jan 2003 19:38:05 -0700
[email protected] (Jason R. Mastaler) • #43
NetBSD SMP
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 08:34:11 -0500
"Will Ellis-Adams" <[email protected]> • #42
For those who pester this list with "how's the progress" questions...
Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:34:05 -0500
"Christian Gruber" <[email protected]> • #41
Re: spinlocks
10 Dec 2002 21:39:09 -0500
Will Ellis-Adams <[email protected]> • #40
Re: spinlocks
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:11:57 -0500 (EST)
Richy Kim <[email protected]> • #39
spinlocks
Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:30:23 -0500
"Will Ellis-Adams" <[email protected]> • #38
Re: info/help
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:39:38 -0000
"Nick Nellis" <[email protected]> • #37
Re: info/help
27 Nov 2002 10:06:25 -0500
Nate Kidwell <[email protected]> • #36
Re: info/help
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:46:45 +0100 (MET)
Janne Johansson <[email protected]> • #35
info/help
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 00:13:54 -0500
Will Ellis-Adams <[email protected]> • #34
Re: Intel P4 and HT
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:26:49 -0800 (PST)
Iain Kyte <[email protected]> • #33
Re: Intel P4 and HT
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:05:44 -0500
Generic Player <[email protected]> • #32
Intel P4 and HT
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:01:14 +1100
"Craig Hammond" <[email protected]> • #31
Re: i386 smp cvs compile error
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:34:34 +0000
Teh Kok How <[email protected]> • #30
i386 smp cvs compile error
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:41:32 +0000
Teh Kok How <[email protected]> • #29
Re: smp dev
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:56:54 -0500
"Karle, Chris" <[email protected]> • #28
Re: smp dev
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 21:06:34 +0200
Michał Koc <[email protected]> • #27
Re: smp dev
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 20:53:21 +0200
Michał Koc <[email protected]> • #26
Re: smp dev
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:59:54 -0400
"Steve Shockley" <[email protected]> • #25
Re: smp dev
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:46:17 -0600
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #24
Re: smp dev
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:03:36 +0000
Grumpy <[email protected]> • #23
Re: smp dev
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 08:58:35 -0400 (EDT)
Richy Kim <[email protected]> • #22
Re: smp dev
Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:57:21 +0800
"SW" <[email protected]> • #21
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:27:24 -0700 (MST)
Nicholas Janzen <[email protected]> • #19
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:40:22 -0400
alex avriette <[email protected]> • #18
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:39:08 -0400
alex avriette <[email protected]> • #17
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:26:10 -0600
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #16
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
tedu <[email protected]> • #15
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:33:47 -0400
alex avriette <[email protected]> • #14
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:13:16 -0600
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #13
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 23:03:35 +0200
Michał Koc <[email protected]> • #12
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:54:58 -0400
"Frank Clements" <[email protected]> • #11
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
R Hill <[email protected]> • #10
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:47:35 -0600
Tobias Weingartner <[email protected]> • #9
Re: smp dev
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 22:24:38 +0200
Michał Koc <[email protected]> • #8
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.